Hamstring tendon fixation using interference screws: a biomechanical study in calf tibial bone

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-8063(98)70117-3Get rights and content

Abstract

It has recently been shown that graft fixation close to the ACL insertion site is optimal in order to increase anterior knee stability. Hamstring tendon fixation using interference screws offers this possibility and a round threaded titanium interference screw has been previously developed. The use of a round threaded biodegradable interference screw may be equivalent. In addition, to increase initial fixation strength, graft harvest with a distally attached bone plug may be advantageous, but biomechanical data do not exist. This study compares the initial pullout force, stiffness of fixation, and failure modes of three strand semitendinosus grafts in 36 proximal calf tibiae using either biodegradable poly-(D,L-lactide) (Sysorb; Sulzer Orthopaedics Ltd, Munsingen, Switzerland) or round threaded titanium (RCI; Smith & Nephew DonJoy, Carlsbad, CA) interference screws, harvested either without (biodegradable: group I, titanium III) or with (biodegradable: group II, titanium: group IV) attached tibial bone plugs. Maximum pullout force in group I (507 ± 93 N) was significantly higher than in group III (419 ± 77 N). Pullout force of bone plug fixation was significantly higher than that of direct tendon fixation (717 ± 90 N in group II and 602 ± 117 N in group IV). Pullout force of biodegradable fixation was significantly higher in both settings. These results indicate that initial pullout force of hamstring-tendon graft interference screw fixation can be increased by using a biodegradable interference screw. In addition, initial pullout force of hamstring-tendon graft fixation with an interference screw can be greatly increased by harvesting the graft with its distally attached tibial bone plug.

Arthroscopy 1998 Jan-Feb;14(1):29-37

References (0)

Cited by (176)

  • Cortical Suspensory Button Versus Aperture Interference Screw Fixation for Knee Anterior Cruciate Ligament Soft-Tissue Allograft: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

    2015, Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    It may be clinically (but not statistically [P = .23]) significant that at final follow-up, 100% of knees showed normal IKDC knee examination ratings in the suspensory group versus 86% of knees in the aperture group. This finding seems important because the trend in all-inside ACL reconstruction is evolution from aperture18 to suspensory fixation,19-26 but the 2-year clinical outcome of all-inside ACL suspensory fixation has not been previously reported, so it is reassuring that the increasingly popular experimental technique (suspensory fixation) did not result in worse outcomes than the control technique (aperture fixation). This is not to imply that, at final follow-up, suspensory fixation scores were uniformly superior to aperture fixation scores; in fact, for some outcome measures (narcotic consumption, KSS pain score, IKDC subjective score, SF-12 physical and mental component scores, and 3 of 4 radiographic scores), aperture fixation showed superior scores, and critically, as noted earlier, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups for any of the outcomes measured.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text