Arthroscopic treatment of arthrofibrosis of the elbow joint

doi:10.1016/S0749-8063(98)70118-5

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery

Volume 14, Issue 1, January–February 1998, Pages 38-44

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-8063(98)70118-5 Get rights and content

Abstract

Twenty-five patients with arthrofibrosis of the elbow were treated with arthroscopic debridement; 15 had post-traumatic arthrofibrosis and 10 had contractures caused by degenerative arthritis. At an average follow-up of 18 months, all patients had increased motion and decreased pain. One patient required reoperation because of continued stiffness and pain; she had moderate pain before surgery, mild pain after initial debridement, and occasional mild pain after the second operation. Patients with post-traumatic arthritis had more severe flexion contractures preoperatively than did those with degenerative arthritis, but they also had more improvement postoperatively. There were no perioperative or postoperative complications. Arthroscopic release and debridement of arthrofibrotic elbow joints appear to obtain improvement equal to that obtained by open techniques, with less morbidity and earlier rehabilitation.

Arthroscopy 1998 Jan-Feb;14(1):38-44

References (0)

Cited by (98)

Wide Range in Complication Rates Following Elbow Arthroscopy in Adult and Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review
2023, Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
To perform a systematic review of complications associated with elbow arthroscopy in adults and children.
A literature search was performed in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Studies reporting complications or reoperations after elbow arthroscopy with at least 5 patients were included. Based on the Nelson classification, the severity of complications was categorized as minor or major. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized clinical trials, and nonrandomized trials were assessed using the Methodological Items for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) tool.
A total of 114 articles were included with 18,892 arthroscopies (16,815 patients). A low risk of bias was seen for the randomized studies and a fair quality for the nonrandomized studies. Complication rates ranged from 0% to 71% (median 3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8%-3.3%), and reoperation rates from 0% to 59% (median 2%; 95% CI, 1.8%-2.2%). A total of 906 complications were observed, with transient nerve palsies (31%) as the most frequent complication. According to Nelson classification, 735 (81%) complications were minor and 171 (19%) major. Forty-nine studies reported complications in adults and 10 studies in children, showing a complication rate ranging from 0% to 27% (median 0%; 95% CI, 0%-0.4%) and 0% to 57% (median 1%; 95% CI, 0.4%-3.5%), respectively. A total of 125 complications were observed in adults, with transient nerve palsies (23%) as the most frequent complication, and 33 in children, with loose bodies after surgery (45%) as the most frequent complication.
Predominantly low-level evidence studies demonstrate varying complication rates (median 3%, range 0%-71%) and reoperation rates (median 2%, range 0%-59%) after elbow arthroscopy. Higher complication rates are observed after more complex surgery. The incidence and type of complications can aid surgeons in patient counseling and refining surgical techniques to further reduce the complication rates.
Level IV; systematic review of Level I-IV studies.
Open elbow contracture release
2022, Surgical Techniques of the Shoulder, Elbow, and Knee in Sports Medicine, Third Edition
Elbow stiffness is common after injury. A stiff capsule can usually be stretched with confident exercises; patience is warranted because intentionally hurting one’s elbow after injury or surgery can be counterintuitive. Operative treatment is more appealing when heterotopic ossification, implants, malunion, nonunion, or articular damage hinders motion and when there is compression of the ulnar nerve. Knowledge of both the medial and the lateral approaches to elbow contracture release allows the surgeon to address all forms of posttraumatic elbow stiffness.
Routine diagnostic arthroscopy with elbow ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction does not reduce the need for future valgus extension overload–related surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
2022, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Valgus extension overload syndrome (VEOS) most commonly affects overhead athletes and consists of a constellation of conditions involving the medial, posterior, and lateral elbow, with the most widely discussed being ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries. Many athletes with UCL tears also have findings consistent with other VEOS conditions, though these are not consistently symptomatic. Given the high rate of concomitant pathology, many authors have recommended performing arthroscopy at the time of UCL reconstruction (UCLR) to diagnose and address concomitant VEOS pathology; however, it is not known if this practice actually leads to a reduction in subsequent surgeries for VEOS conditions following index UCLR. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine if performing routine diagnostic arthroscopy (RDA) in patients undergoing UCLR was associated with a lower incidence of future VEOS-related surgery.
This study was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, with the primary outcome of interest being the likelihood of needing future surgery to address VEOS conditions with or without RDA at the time of index UCLR. The proportion and incidence rate of subsequent VEOS-related surgeries following UCLR with and without RDA were compared in mixed effects models.
There were 25 eligible studies from an initial 1335 systematically identified articles, with results for 2118 UCLR cases. Among these, there were a total of 94 reported VEOS-related surgeries. The proportion of subsequent VEOS-related surgeries was lower when UCLR was performed with RDA (0.40%, 95% CI 0.00%-3.51%) than without (1.16%, 95% CI 0.03%-3.25%), but the difference was not significant (P = .584). The incidence rate of VEOS-related surgeries was 0.16 (95% CI 0.00-0.95) per 100 person-years with RDA and 0.14 (95% CI 0.00-0.55) per 100 person-years without RDA (P = .942).
RDA preceding UCLR does not significantly reduce the proportion or rate of subsequent surgery for other VEOS conditions. There has been a decrease in RDA utilization with UCLR over time for athletes with torn/incompetent UCLs but otherwise no known symptomatic VEOS conditions, and this trend appears to be justified based on these findings.
Anterior elbow release for post-traumatic flexion contractures in patients 21 years or younger
2020, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
An elbow contracture in a young person can be a devastating problem. Significant contractures will lead to functional loss of the extremity. Appropriately performed contracture release can have profound implications on the overall well-being of the patient. The purpose of this study was to report improvements in sagittal-plane range of motion and the complication rate following an anterior elbow release for flexion contractures in patients 21 years or younger.
We performed a retrospective review of 27 patients with a median age of 16.8 years who were treated surgically for elbow flexion contracture with an anterior approach. Follow-up was possible in 18 of these patients at an average of 31 months. An anterior approach was performed in all 18 patients, with 4 patients undergoing an additional posterior incision to address posterior structures limiting extension.
Elbow extension improved by an average of 35°, from –54° to –19°. The mean total arc of elbow motion improved by 37°, from 65° to 102°. Two complications occurred: traction-related neurapraxia of the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve and transient neurapraxia of the posterior interosseous nerve.
Elbow contracture release through an anterior approach is an acceptable surgical option. Significant improvement is obtained with a low risk of complications.
The clinical impact of arthroscopic vs. open osteocapsular débridement for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow: a systematic review
2020, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Citation Excerpt :
Twenty-seven studies (811 elbows) reported ROM measurements.1,4,8,10,14,19,22,26,27,29-31,34,36,39-46,48,53,54,56,57 All 27 of the studies that reported on ROM (811 elbows) reported flexion measurements,1,4,8,10,14,19,22,26,27,29-31,34,36,39-46,48,53,54,56,57 although 1 study (21 elbows) grouped its results into flexion ranges, so these results were not included in weighted means.39 One study had an arthroscopic group and an open group, so it was included in each category.57
Primary elbow osteoarthritis (PEOA) is a debilitating disease that can be difficult to treat. Osteocapsular débridement (OD) has been described through various approaches, including arthroscopic and open approaches, with successful outcomes in treating PEOA. There is insufficient evidence in the literature to date to demonstrate the superiority of any approach. The purpose of this review was to compare the clinical results of arthroscopic vs. open OD for PEOA.
The online databases PubMed, Embase (Elsevier), and Scopus (Elsevier) were searched from inception through April 1, 2018, for clinical studies reporting on OD. Studies were stratified based on an arthroscopic vs. open approach. Weighted means were calculated for surgical and patient-reported outcomes.
We included 30 studies, reporting on 871 patients and 887 elbows, with a mean follow-up period of 44.3 ± 25.5 months. Of these studies, 15 (420 elbows) reported on open OD, 14 (456 elbows) reported arthroscopic OD, and 1 reported on a cohort of each approach (open in 5 elbows and arthroscopic in 6). The Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved by 28.6 ± 4.57 in the open group vs. 26.6 ± 7.24 in the arthroscopic group. Flexion improved by 19° ± 6° in the open group and 10° ± 6° in the arthroscopic group. Extension improved by 11° ± 5° in the open group and 11° ± 6° in the arthroscopic group.
Open OD and arthroscopic OD are effective surgical treatment options for patients with symptomatic PEOA, reliably improving flexion, extension, and functional outcome scores with low complication rates.
Arthroscopic visualization of the medial collateral ligament of the elbow
2019, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
This study aimed to determine the extent to which the medial collateral ligament (MCL) can be visualized during a standard posterior arthroscopic view of the elbow.
Eight fresh human cadaveric elbows were placed in a simulated lateral decubitus position. Standard elbow arthroscopy was performed on each specimen using a standard posterior portal for visualization with a 30° arthroscope. The most distal borders of the visible part of the MCL were marked using a spinal needle and tagged using nylon sutures. Subsequently, the elbow was dissected. The overall surface area of the entire MCL and that defined by the suture tags were calculated for each specimen.
The mean area of the visible part of the MCL represented 48% of the mean overall area. The arthroscopically tagged part of the posterior band of the MCL represented <50% of the entire MCL. Arthroscopic visualization was not available for most of the posterior bands of the MCL.
Less than half of the MCL is visible with a 30° arthroscope from standard posterior portal. Thus, sole reliance on arthroscopic visualization with this manner is not enough to release of the MCL. The variable effort is required to improve the limited visualization during the procedure. Moreover, the individual attention is essential to protect the ulnar nerve because the ulnar nerve is very close to the MCL especially to the anterior band.

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text