Original articleEffect of superior and superolateral relocations of the hip center on hip joint forces: An experimental and analytical analysis
References (29)
- et al.
Total hip reconstruction using femoral head allografts in patients with acetabular bone loss
Orthop Clin North Am
(1987) - et al.
The Harris-Galante Porous Acetabular Component press-fit without screw fixation: 5 year radiographic analysis of primary cases
J Arthroplasty
(1994) - et al.
Revision total hip arthroplasty: the use of solid allograft
J Arthroplasty
(1993) - et al.
Joint forces in the human pelvis-leg skeleton during walking
J Biomech Eng
(1984) - et al.
A biomechanical investigation of the human hip
J Biomech
(1978) - et al.
The prediction of muscular load sharing and joint forces in the lower extremities during walking
J Biomech
(1975) - et al.
The use of bone allografts in two-stage reconstruction after failure of hip replacements due to infection
J Bone Joint Surg
(1991) - et al.
Total hip arthroplasty in protrusio acetabuli of rheumatoid arthritis
J Bone Joint Surg
(1980) - et al.
Experience with the implantation of porous coated hip endoprostheses and primary stability of implantation
Magy Traumatol Ortop Kezseb Plasztikai Seb
(1993) - et al.
Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982: a two to five-year follow-up
J Bone Joint Surg
(1985)
Total hip replacements in patients younger than thirty years old
J Bone Joint Surg
(1981)
Total hip arthroplasties in patients less than forty-five years old
J Bone Joint Surg
(1983)
Proximal placement of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty
J Bone Joint Surg
(1991)
Total hip acetabular component position affects component loosening rates
Clin Orthop
(1988)
Cited by (107)
Instability After Total Hip Arthroplasty and the Role of Advanced and Robotic Technology
2021, Orthopedic Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :Vertical placement of the cup has been proposed as a strategy to combat this challenge.70 Initial studies accepted a maximum vertically displaced center of rotation of 35 mm for optimizing bone coverage while preventing substantial loss of range of motion.71,72 In contrast, a more recent study reported that a vertically displaced center of rotation of greater than 23.9 mm resulted in a significantly increased risk of dislocation.73
Does restoration of hip center with subtrochanteric osteotomy provide preferable outcome for Crowe type III–IV irreducible development dysplasia of the hip??
2017, Journal of the Chinese Medical Association
Supported by a grant from University Orthopaedics.
Copyright © 1996 Published by Elsevier Inc.