American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Volume 102, Issue 5, November 1992, Pages 393-409
Treatment of Class II high angle malocclusions with the Herbst appliance: A cephalometric investigation
References (28)
- et al.
Mandibular anchorage in Herbst treatment
Eur J Orthod
(1988) - et al.
Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation
Eur J Orthod
(1986) Updating the bonded Herbst appliance
J Clin Orthod
(1983)A method used to anchor the Herbst appliance
J Craniomandibular Pract
(1988)A growth-related concept for skeletal Class II treatment
Am J Orthod
(1978)- et al.
Maturation indicators and the pubertal growth spurt
Am J Orthod
(1982) Orthodontic-orthopedic treatment of craniomandibular pain dysfunction. Part I: diagnosis with transcranial radiographs
J Craniomandibular Pract
(1984)- et al.
Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years
Eur J Orthod
(1983) - et al.
The clinical significance of tracing error in cephalometry
Br J Orthod
(1974) - et al.
The skeletofacial growth pattern pre- and post-dentofacial orthopaedics. A long term study of Class II malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance
Eur J Orthod
(1990)
Dreissigjahrige Erfahrungen mit dem Retentions-Scharnier
Zahnartztl Rundschau
(1934)
Dreissigjahrige Erfahrungen mit dem Retentions-Scharnier
Zahnartztl Rundschau
(1934)
Dreissigjahrige Erfahrungen mit dem Retentions-Scharnier
Zahnartztl Rundschau
(1934)
Treatment of Class II malocelusions by bite jumping with the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric investigation
Am J Orthod
(1979)
The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment: a cephalometric investigation
Am J Orthod
(1982)
The Herbst appliance: its biologic effects and clinical use
Am J Orthod
(1985)
Cited by (0)
- a
Assistant Professor, University of Perugia, Italy.
Copyright © 1992 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.