Craniofacial structure and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome — a qualitative analysis and meta-analysis of the literature*

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70177-4Get rights and content

The etiologic relevance of craniofacial structure to obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is controversial yet the premise of a causal association serves to justify many treatments. A qualitative and quantitative analysis of the literature was performed to examine the foundation for any relationship between craniofacial structure and OSAS. A MEDLINE search and investigation of the published and unpublished literature on diagnostic imaging and OSAS was toxonomically arranged. Each sample study was evaluated by using the following criteria: (a) appropriate control group, (b) “blinding” of evaluators, (c) reliability measured, (d) random assignment of treatment, and (e) “success” was defined adequately in efficacy studies. Morphologic variables were combined among studies and compared with controls drawn from either the same patient pool as the OSAS group, or matched for gender, age, and body mass index. Analysis revealed 32 review articles, 16 case reports, and 95 sample studies. Only seven sample studies drew a control group from the same patient pool, whereas five used matched controls. Only one of these studies satisfied all the qualitative criteria. Of the treatment efficacy studies, 10 defined outcome adequately. However, none of these met all the qualitative criteria. The most consistent, strong effect sizes with the highest potential diagnostic accuracies were for mandibular plane to hyoid, mandibular plane angle, and mandibular body length. Only mandibular body length demonstrated a clinically significant association with and diagnostic accuracy for OSAS. However, since this variable's controls were selected from the literature, possible explanations for a positive association include methodologic differences between studies, varying magnification factors, and morphologic differences.

References (39)

  • GreenwaldA.G.

    Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis

    Psych Bull

    (1975)
  • RosenthalR.

    Combining results of independent studies

    Psych Bull

    (1978)
  • ChalmersT.C. et al.

    Minimizing the three stages of publication bias

    J Am Med Assoc

    (1990)
  • SacksH.S. et al.

    Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials

    New Eng J Med

    (1987)
  • GlassG.V.

    Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research

    Educ Res

    (1976)
  • FeinsteinA.R.

    Clinical biostatistics: XLIV. A survey of the research architecture used for publications in general medical journals

    Clin Pharmacol Therapeut

    (1978)
  • BehrentsR.G.

    An atlas of growth in the aging craniofacial skeleton

  • RioloM.L. et al.

    An atlas of craniofacial growth

  • LightR.J. et al.

    Summing up: the science of reviewing research

    (1984)
  • Cited by (187)

    • Sleepiness in children with severe malocclusion compared with in children with neutral occlusion

      2024, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
    • Imaging upper airway obstruction in obstructive sleep apnea

      2023, Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Children
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    Supported by NIH/NIDR grant no. DE 06881 and no. DE 09883.

    a

    Orthodontist, Gold Coast, Australia.

    1

    From the University of Pittsburgh.

    b

    Associate Dean for Research and Graduate Affairs.

    c

    Assistant Professor, Department of Public Health and Community Dentistry.

    d

    Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine.

    e

    Professor of Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health.

    View full text