Classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3579(05)80191-8Get rights and content

Summary

The development of classification schemes for RA in the last 40 years hasfollowed the increasingly precise understanding of the nature of the clinical disease and the recognition of the different requirements of classification methods in clinic and population settings.

In published studies of RA in clinic patients the most widely used criteriasets have been the 1958 ARA (ACR) criteria and its 1961 adaptation (the Rome (active) criteria). These sets classified disease as ‘classical’, ‘definite’, ‘probable’ and ‘possible’ RA based on criteria comprising clinical, serological, radiological and histological features (the latter were dropped from the Rome criteria set because of their impracticality). More recently, a new criteria set (the 1987 ARA criteria) has been developed using statistical techniques. This set was derived using RA cases and controls attending hospital clinics. It is based on the earlier criteria sets but accommodates the characteristic pattern of joint involvement in RA more precisely. The criteria recognize only the single disease category of ‘rheumatoid arthritis’. In validation studies, the 1987 criteria set has been found to have enhanced specificity over earlier schemes in clinic-based studies of RA. The sensitivity may, however, be reduced, in particular in studies of early disease.

The application of classification criteria for case recognition in the population and family studies of RA has proved more problematic. In these settings, there is the additional requirement to recognize individuals with remitted and inactive disease as RA cases. The 1966 New York criteria were developed for this specific purpose, however their format proved cumbersome and they have not been widely adopted. The 1987 criteria set is insufficiently sensitive to recognize inactive disease if the criteria are applied exactly as they have been defined. The sensitivity of the 1987 criteria set is, however, substantially enhanced if the criteria are adapted to incorporate features of past disease activity, for example by allowing deformity to substitute for swelling and by incorporating data on the past occurrence of rheumatoid factor and rheumatoid nodules.

Developments in the immunology and genetics of RA may in the futureprovide more accurate tools for classification and may lead to recognition of more precise disease subsets. At present, however, the 1987 ARA criteria provide the most appropriate basis for case recognition in both clinic and population-based studies.

References (63)

  • BallJ

    Sheep cell agglutination test for rheumatoid arthritis. A clinicopathological study

    Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

    (1952)
  • BeightonP et al.

    Rheumatoid arthritis in a rural South African Negro population

    Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

    (1975)
  • BennettPH et al.
  • de BlécourtJJ

    La lutte contre le rheumatisme aux pays bas

    Revue du Rhumatisme et des Maladies Ostéo-Articulaires

    (1953)
  • BreimanL et al.
  • CathcartES et al.

    Rheumatoid arthritis in a New England town

    New England Journal of Medicine

    (1970)
  • DugowsonCE et al.

    Evaluation of the 1987 revised criteria for rheumatoid arthritis in a cohort of newly diagnosed female patients

    Arthritis and Rheumatism

    (1990)
  • EdwardsJCW

    ARA criteria for rheumatoid arthritis

    British Journal of Rheumatology

    (1988)
  • EdwardsJCW et al.

    Different criteria for different purposes

    Journal of Rheumatology

    (1988)
  • de GraafF
  • GregersonPR et al.

    The shared epitope hypothesis. An approach to understanding the molecular genetics of susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis

    Arthritis and Rheumatism

    (1987)
  • HakalaM et al.

    The ARA 1987 revised criteria select patients with clinical rheumatoid arthritis from a population based cohort of subjects with chronic rheumatic disease registered for drug reimbursement

    Journal of Rheumatology

    (1993)
  • HazesJMW et al.

    A reevaluation of the symptom of morning stiffness

    Journal of Rheumatology

    (1993)
  • HazesJMW et al.

    Consistency of morning stiffness: an analysis of diary data

    British Journal of Rheumatology

    (1994)
  • HealeyLA et al.

    The relation of polymyalgia rheumatica to rheumatoid arthritis

    Journal of Rheumatology

    (1988)
  • HealeyLA

    Classification, clinical assessment, clinical features, and complications

    Current Opinion in Rheumatology

    (1990)
  • JacobsonLTH et al.

    A cross-sectional and longitudinal comparison of the Rome criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (equivalent to the American College of Rheumatology 1958 criteria) and the American College of Rheumatology 1987 criteria for rheumatoid arthritis

    Arthritis and Rheumatism

    (1994)
  • KellgrenJH et al.

    Rheumatic complaints in an urban population

    Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

    (1953)
  • KellgrenJH et al.

    Rheumatoid arthritis in a population sample

    Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

    (1956)
  • KellgrenJH

    Diagnostic criteria for population studies

    Bulletin on the Rheumatic Diseases

    (1962)
  • Cited by (32)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text