Elsevier

European Journal of Cancer

Volume 37, Issue 18, December 2001, Pages 2365-2372
European Journal of Cancer

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast results of conservative and radical treatments in 716 patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00303-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Until now, less than 5% of the patients with breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) have been enrolled in clinical trials. Consequently, we have analysed the results of ‘current practice’ among 716 women treated in eight French Cancer Centres from 1985 to 1992: 441 cases (61.6%) corresponded to impalpable lesions, 92 had a clinical size of less than or equal to 2 cm and 70 from 2 to 5 cm; in 113 cases, the size was unspecified. Median age was 53.2 years (range: 21–87 years). 145 patients underwent mastectomy (RS) and 571 conservative surgery (CS) without (136) or with (435) radiotherapy (CS+RT). The mean histological tumour sizes in these three groups were 25.6, 8.2, 14.8 mm, respectively (P<0.0001). After a 91-month median follow-up, local recurrence (LR) rates were 2.1, 30.1 and 13.8% in the RS, CS and CS +RT groups, respectively (P=0.001); LR were invasive in 59 and 60% in the CS and CS+RT groups, respectively. In these groups, the 8-year LR rates were 31.3 and 13.9%, respectively (P=0.0001). Nodal recurrence occurred in 3.7 and 1.8% in the CS and CS+RT groups. Metastases rates were 1.4, 4.4 and 1.4% in the RS, CS and CS+RT groups. Among the 60 cases of invasive LR, in CS and CS+RT groups 19% developed metastases. After multivariate analysis, we did not identify any significant LR risk factor in the CS group, whereas young age (<40years) and incomplete excision were significant in the CS+RT group (P=0.012 and P=0.02, respectively).

Introduction

With the increasing use of mammography, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has become a more common diagnosis. Estimates for the next decade are that DCIS will form approximately 20% of all breast cancers 1, 2. For years, mastectomy was the standard treatment with an almost 100% cure rate.

Many centres now use breast conserving surgery, alone (CS) or with radiotherapy (CS+RT), for selected cases of DCIS 3, 4, 5 but results in term of local recurrence (LR) vary widely. This may be explained by heterogeneity in the inclusion criteria, therapeutic modalities, histological procedures, methods of detection and follow-up duration.

Until now, two randomised trials have confirmed that radiation therapy (RT) decreases the rates of LR of invasive and non-invasive disease in DCIS treated conservatively 6, 7, 8, 9. However, the patients included in these trials form less than 5% of all DCIS treated in the same period and it is still doubtful whether to use RT in all cases, such as those particularly outlined in the Van Nuys team's paper [10].

We describe herein a retrospective analysis of the treatments used and outcomes in DCIS in eight French Cancer Centres between January 1985 and December 1992.

Section snippets

Patients and methods

DCIS treated in eight cancer centres were listed by Enquête Permanente Cancer ((E.P.C.)=continuous cancer inquiry) and collected after confirmation of absence of microinvasion and axillary nodal involvement. For each case, a complete histological report was attached to the collecting form.

There was no age or size limitations. All patients underwent initial surgery by lumpectomy, quadrantectomy or mastectomy. Radical surgery (with or without reconstruction) was generally used for lesions larger

Results

Our results are based on ‘clinical practice’ in a large experience in specialised centres using regularly a multidisciplinary approach in breast diseases.

Discussion

Mastectomy remains the safest treatment for women with DCIS and our results confirm a 98% local control rate as reported by other series 1, 2.

Two large randomised trials showed that RT statistically increases local control following local excision of DCIS 6, 7, 8, 9 and the multivariate analysis in this study points to a similar finding.

Several papers have tried to identify the pathological features that are predictive for LR, but the majority have failed [1]. The analysis of the histological

References (34)

  • G.F. Schwartz et al.

    Consensus Conference on the treatment of in situ ductal carcinoma of the breast, April 22-25, 1999

    Cancer

    (2000)
  • E.S. Hwang et al.

    Management of ductal carcinoma in situ

    Surg. Clin. North Am.

    (1999)
  • M.D. Lagios

    Lagios experience

  • L.J. Solin et al.

    Ductal carcinoma in situ (intraductal carcinoma) of the breast treated with breast-conserving surgery and definitive irradiation. Correlation of pathologic parameters with outcome of treatment

    Cancer

    (1993)
  • M.J. Silverstein

    Van Nuys experience by treatment

  • B. Fisher et al.

    Lumpectomy and radiation therapy fot the treatment of intraductal breast cancerfindings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-17

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (1998)
  • E.R. Fisher et al.

    Pathologic findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP). Eight-year update of protocol B-17. Intraductal Carcinoma

    Cancer

    (1999)
  • J.P. Julien et al.

    Radiotherapy in breast-conservative treatment for ductal carcinoma in situfirst results of the EORTC randomized phase III trial 10853

    Lancet

    (2000)
  • N. Bijker et al.

    Risk factor for recurrence and metastasis after breast conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situanalysis of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial 10853

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2001)
  • M.J. Silverstein et al.

    The influence of margin width on local control of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (1999)
  • R. Holland et al.

    Ductal carcinoma in situa proposal for a new classification

    Sem. Diag. Pathol.

    (1994)
  • M.J. Silverstein et al.

    Prognostic classification of breast ductal carcinoma in situ

    Lancet

    (1995)
  • F. Warnberg et al.

    Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast from a population-defined cohortan evaluation of new histopathological classification systems

    Eur. J. Cancer

    (1999)
  • K. Zaugg et al.

    Is there a role for molecular prognostic factors in the clinical management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast?

    Radiother. Oncol.

    (2000)
  • A. Recht et al.

    The fourth EORTC DCIS Consensus Meeting (Château Marquette, Heemskerk, The Netherlands, 23–24 January 1998). Conference Report

    Eur. J. Cancer

    (1998)
  • J. Rosai

    Borderline epithelial lesions of the breast

    Am. J. Surg. Pathol.

    (1991)
  • van de Vijever MJ. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: histological classification and genetic alterations. In...
  • Cited by (0)

    Presented in part at the 2nd European Breast Cancer Conference (EBCC) in Brussels on 28 September 2000.

    View full text