Elsevier

European Journal of Cancer

Volume 33, Issue 9, August 1997, Pages 1453-1460
European Journal of Cancer

Original paper
Interval cancers and cancers in non-attenders in the östergötland mammographic screening programme. Duration between screening and diagnosis, S-phase fraction and distant recurrence

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(97)00185-8Get rights and content

Abstract

The study was based on a population mammographic screening programme for women aged 40–74 years. Metastatic potential was analysed in 843 invasive breast cancers with regard to mode of detection and a number of prognostic factors. There was a higher metastatic capacity in clinically detected cases, but multivariate analyses showed that neither the mode of detection (hazard rate ratio of distant recurrence RR = 1.39, 95% CI 0.78–2.46 interval cancers and RR = 1.6, 95% CI 0.76–3.36 non-attenders) nor the duration between screening and diagnosis for true interval cancers (RR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.16–1.35 in tumours detected later than one year after screening) were independent prognostic factors. A correlation was found between metastatic potential and the SPF (RR = 2.94, 95% CI 1.57–5.50 in tumours with a high SPF), the oestrogen receptor status and the tumour stage. In conclusion, interval cancers intrinsically are not different from other breast cancers with equivalent characteristics; the duration between screening and diagnosis in interval cancers was not clearly correlated to the prognosis, but the S-phase fraction was a powerful predictor of prognosis.

References (22)

  • L Tabar et al.

    Update the Swedish two-country program of mammographic screening for breast cancer

    Radiol Clin North Am

    (1992)
  • L Holmberg et al.

    Survival in breast cancer diagnosed between mammographic screening examinations

    Lancet

    (1986)
  • CT Brekelmans et al.

    Survival in interval breast cancer in the DOM screening programme

    Eur J Cancer

    (1995)
  • I Anderson et al.

    Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial

    BMJ

    (1988)
  • S Shapiro et al.

    Current results of the breast cancer screening randomized trial: the Health Insurance Plan (HIP) of Greater New York study

  • SM Moss et al.

    Survival of patients with breat cancer diagnosed in the United Kingdom trial of early detection of breast cancer

    J Med Screening

    (1994)
  • J Frisell et al.

    Randomized study of mammography screening-preliminary report on mortality in the Stockholm trial

    Breast Cancer Treat Res

    (1991)
  • M Hakama et al.

    Aggressiveness of screendetected breast cancers

    Lancet

    (1995)
  • OP Kallioniemi et al.

    DNA flow cytometric analysis indicates that many breast cancers detected in the first round of mammographic screening have a low malignant potential

    Int J Cancer

    (1988)
  • LS Heuser et al.

    The association of pathologic and mammographic characteristics of primary human breast cancers with ‘slow’ and ‘fast’ growth rates and with axillary lymph node metastases

    Cancer

    (1984)
  • R DeGroote et al.

    Interval breast cancer: a more aggressive subset of breast neoplasias

    Surgery

    (1983)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text