Current Biology
Volume 4, Issue 12, December 1994, Pages 1069-1076
Journal home page for Current Biology

Research Paper
Reconstitution of the DNA base excision—repair pathway

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00245-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Background: The base excision–repair pathway is the major cellular defence mechanism against spontaneous DNA damage. The enzymes involved have been highly conserved during evolution. Base excision–repair has been reproduced previously with crude cell-free extracts of bacterial or human origin. To further our understanding of base excision–repair, we have attempted to reconstitute the pathway in vitro using purified enzymes.

Results We report here the successful reconstitution of the base excision–repair pathway with five purified enzymes from Escherichia coli: uracil-DNA glycosylase, a representative of the DNA glycosylases that remove various lesions from DNA; the AP endonuclease IV that specifically cleaves at abasic sites; RecJ protein which excises a 5′ terminal deoxyribose-phosphate residue; DNA polymerase I; and DNA ligase. The reaction proceeds with high efficiency in the absence of additional factors in the reconstituted system. Four of the enzymes are absolutely required for completion of the repair reaction. An unusual feature we have discovered is that the pathway branches after enzymatic incision at an abasic DNA site. RecJ protein is required for the major reaction, which involves replacement of only a single nucleotide at the damaged site; in its absence, an alternative pathway is observed, with generation of longer repair patches by the 5′ nuclease function of DNA polymerase I.

Conclusion Repair of uracil in DNA is achieved by a very short-patch excision–repair process involving five different enzymes. No additional protein factors seem to be required. There is a minor, back-up pathway that uses replication factors to generate longer repair patches.

Section snippets

Background:

Three different excision–repair pathways are universally present in living organisms, and constitute the main cellular strategies for removing lesions and pre-mutagenic errors from DNA. Strand-specific mismatch repair provides protection against occasional rare errors that occur during DNA replication and have escaped proof-reading mechanisms. Nucleotide excision–repair (NER) is responsible for correction of damage that causes major helix distortion, in particular the dipyrimidine adducts

Requirement for a DNA glycosylase in the in vitro reaction

Uracil residues in DNA can be generated by cytosine deamination and are repaired efficiently in vivo by a BER process initiated by uracil-DNA glycosylase [10]. Double-stranded oligonucleotides containing a centrally placed G.U base pair, surrounded by appropriate restriction enzyme sites, have been employed as substrates for in vitro reactions [4]. In previous work with E. coli extracts, the dUMP residue was replaced efficiently by a dCMP residue. No incorporation of newly synthesized material

Discussion

A general model for the BER process (Figure 6) may be proposed on the basis of the results described above and recent results obtained with cell extracts and partially purified components [4], [8]. This model is similar to previous schemes [18], [19], but the existence of a branched pathway and the events associated with removal of the deoxyribose-phosphate residue at an incised abasic site are new features. The main route, which has been reproduced with purified enzymes in the present study,

Reagent enzymes

The following E. coli enzymes were purified from enzyme-overproducing strains as described: uracil-DNA glycosylase [33], endonuclease IV [34], RecJ protein [13], [14] and Fpg protein [15]. E. coli DNA polymerase I, DNA ligase, exonuclease III and T4 polynucleotide kinase were obtained from Boehringer-Mannheim. Restriction endonuclease HpaII was purchased from New England Biolabs, Inc.

Cell extracts and oligonucleotide substrates

E. coli NH5033 (recB, sbcB, endA) was obtained from S.C. West, and E. coli BD10 (ung, thyA, deoC) and its ung+

Grigory Dianov and Tomas Lindahl (corresponding author), Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Clare Hall Laboratories, South Mimms, Hertfordshire, EN6 3LD, UK.

Present address for Grigory Dianov: Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235,USA.

References (36)

  • RP Cunningham et al.

    Endonuclease IV (nfo) mutant of Escherichia coli.

    J Bacteriol

    (1986)
  • G Dianov et al.

    Generation of single-nucleotide repair patches following excision of uracil residues from DNA

    Mol Cell Biol

    (1992)
  • Z Wang et al.

    DNA repair synthesis during base excision repair in vitro is catalyzed by DNA polymerase ϵ and is influenced by DNA polymerases α and δ in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    Mol Cell Biol

    (1993)
  • Y Matsumoto et al.

    Repair of a synthetic abasic site in DNA in a Xenopus laevis oocyte extract

    Mol Cell Biol

    (1989)
  • Y Matsumoto et al.

    Repair of a synthetic abasic site involves concerted reactions of DNA synthesis followed by excision and ligation

    Mol Cell Biol

    (1991)
  • Y Matsumoto et al.

    Proliferating cell nuclear antigen-dependent abasic site repair in Xenopus laevis oocytes: an alternative pathway of base excision DNA repair

    Mol Cell Biol

    (1994)
  • A Price et al.

    Enzymatic release of 5′-terminal deoxyribose phosphate residues from damaged DNA in human cells

    Biochemistry

    (1991)
  • Cited by (222)

    • In vitro eradication of abasic site-mediated DNA–peptide/protein cross-links by Escherichia coli long-patch base excision repair

      2022, Journal of Biological Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      This is possibly due to the steric hindrance of the cross-linked 10-mer peptide. The 5′-dRP has also been reported to be excised by E. coli RecJ, a 5′ to 3′ exonuclease (10). However, such activity is controversial as it was not observed by Lloyd et al. (41).

    • The multifaceted roles of DNA repair and replication proteins in aging and obesity

      2021, DNA Repair
      Citation Excerpt :

      Briefly, a lesion-specific glycosylase recognizes and removes the damaged base by cleaving the glycosidic bond between the damaged base and phosphate backbone, leaving an apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site. AP Endonuclease 1 (APE1) then makes an incision in the backbone generating 3’hydroxyl (3’OH) and 5’deoxyribosephosphate (5’dRP) ends [13]. In most cases, the 5’dRP moiety can be removed by polymerase β (pol β), which then uses the opposite DNA strand as a template to fill in the nucleotide gap.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Grigory Dianov and Tomas Lindahl (corresponding author), Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Clare Hall Laboratories, South Mimms, Hertfordshire, EN6 3LD, UK.

    Present address for Grigory Dianov: Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235,USA.

    View full text