Elsevier

The Knee

Volume 9, Issue 3, September 2002, Pages 197-200
The Knee

Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction: a 5–9 year follow-up

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0160(02)00019-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction has a satisfactory functional outcome of up to 90%, but there are few long-term prospective studies. This prospective study presents the outcomes of ACL reconstruction in terms of laxity, function and degenerative change, after a mean follow-up of 7 years. Function was assessed using the Lysholm and Tegner Activity Scores, laxity using the Stryker Knee Laxity Tester, employing maximum manual effort, and degenerative change was assessed as joint line narrowing on standardised radiographs. At latest follow-up, the mean Lysholm score improved from 70 to 87 and the Tegner from 4 to 7 (P<0.001). AP translation also improved (P<0.001). The incidence of early degenerative change was 50% and although this appeared to be associated with a previous meniscectomy, the correlation was not significant (P=0.06). In conclusion, the improved functional scores and laxity are sustained beyond 7 years but the 50% incidence of early degenerative change may be a cause for concern.

Introduction

Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) with autologous tendon grafts results in a satisfactory outcome in up to 90% of patients [1], [6], [11]. Most current data are retrospective, with few prospective studies. Only one study provides prospective data beyond 5 years [13].

We report on the outcomes in 30 patients, followed up prospectively after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction for a minimum of 5 years. The purpose of this study was to determine if the satisfactory results of ACL reconstruction are maintained beyond 5 years and to assess the incidence of degenerative change.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

This is a prospective cohort study, looking at 90 patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction, between 1991 and 1995 (minimum 5 years post surgery). An independent assessor evaluated each patient at the surgical pre-assessment clinic, 1 week prior to operation and at latest follow-up. All reconstructions were performed by one surgeon (RWN). Follow-up was by invitation to an outpatient clinic during a period of recall, from September 2000 to March 2001.

All patients were asked to report

Results

The details of the patients in the cohort are shown in Table 1. At 7 years, 12 patients had made a change in their first choice sport. In no case was this attributed to the knee pathology alone. Only one person changed their employment from manual to sedentary work due to their knee.

The findings on examination of the knee are summarised in Table 2. At follow-up only three patients gave a history of instability.

The functional assessments demonstrated an improvement at 7 years. Fig. 1, Fig. 2

Discussion

Restoration of the normal biomechanics of the knee with reconstruction of the deficient ACL is believed to improve the long-term function [6]. There are, however, few prospective studies. Up to 5 years, Deehan et al. [6] have reported 90% good or excellent function and Jomha et al/ [13] suggested that successful outcome is maintained at 7 years, with 81% satisfactory results. In this study, we prospectively recorded knee function and laxity at a mean follow-up of 7 years (minimum 5 years).

The

References (17)

  • D.S. Johnson et al.

    Outcome measurement in the ACL deficient knee—what's the score?

    Knee

    (2001)
  • P. Aglietti et al.

    Patellar tendon versus doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

    Am J Sport Med

    (1994)
  • B.R. Bach et al.

    Arthrometric evaluation of knees that have a torn anterior cruciate ligament

    J Bone Jt Surg

    (1990)
  • D.M. Daniel et al.

    Fate of the ACL-injured patient

    Am J Sport Med

    (1994)
  • D.M. Daniel et al.

    Instrumented measures of anterior knee laxity in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament disruption

    Am J Sports Med

    (1985)
  • D.M. Daniel et al.

    Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee

    J Bone Jt Surg, (A)

    (1995)
  • D.J. Deehan et al.

    Endoscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with an ipsilateral patellar tendon autograft

    J Bone Jt Surg

    (2000)
  • F.H. Fu et al.

    Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part I. Biology and biomechanics of reconstruction

    Am J Sport Med

    (1999)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (67)

  • Effect of anterior cruciate ligament rupture on secondary damage to menisci and articular cartilage

    2016, Knee
    Citation Excerpt :

    In addition, ACL deficiency causes instability in knee joint during activities, which may alter normal contact pressure and area in ACL-ruptured knees, induce damage to articular cartilage, and eventually lead to the development of osteoarthritis [9,20]. Although it is not clear whether all ACL-ruptured patients will develop joint diseases, some researchers have reported that the incidence of chondral damage is increased with prolonged TFI [21,22]. In this study, 20.5% of patients developed one or more cartilage damages, whose incidence was much higher in the group with a TFI of > 2 years (58.3%).

  • The effects of core muscle activation on dynamic trunk position and knee abduction moments: Implications for ACL injury

    2013, Journal of Biomechanics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a major injury for an athlete to sustain. Athletes often lose the remainder of their season, experience pain in the knee even after surgical repair and rehabilitation which can limit future involvement in sport, and have an increased risk of developing osteoarthritis later in life (Dunn and Spindler, 2010; Lohmander et al., 2004; Ruiz et al., 2002). In addition, decreased academic performance has been reported in high school and collegiate athletes after experiencing an ACL tear (Freedman et al., 1998; Trentacosta et al., 2009).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text