Subaxial (C3–C7) cervical spine injuries : Comparison of early and late surgical intervention

 

PDF Download Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine whether the timing of surgery affects neurological outcome in patients with subaxial cervical spine trauma. We studied 41 patients with a fracture and/or fracture-dislocation of C3 to C7 cervical vertebrae who were treated operatively during the period January 2004 to June 2009. Surgery was performed as soon as the patient's medical condition allowed, within 2 weeks of trauma in 20 patients and after 2 weeks of the injury in 21 patients. Outcome was assessed using Frankel grading. In both groups only those patients who had incomplete spinal cord injury showed neurological improvement after surgery. There was no statistically significant difference in final neurological outcomes in patients having early as opposed to delayed surgery. Similarly there was no statistically significant difference in two groups based on level of injury and associated cord injury. Surgical intervention for cervical injuries is safe, as no postoperative neurological deterioration was recorded. Timing of surgery does not affect neurological outcome.

• References

• 1 Korres DS. Injuries of the cervical spine. Litsas Medical Publications; Athens: 1993
  Google Scholar
• 2 Rizzolo SJ, Vaccaro AR, Cotler JM. Cervical spine trauma. Spine 1994; 19: 2288-2298
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Levi L, Wolf A, Rigamonti D, Ragheb J, Mirvis S, Robinson WL. Anterior decompression in cervical spine trauma: does the timing of surgery affect the outcome?. Neurosurgery 1991; 29: 216-222
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Mirza SK, Krengel 3rd WF, Chapman JR, Anderson PA, Bailey JC, Grady MS. et al Early versus delayed surgery for acute cervical spinal cord injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; 59 (03) 104-114
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Papadopoulos SM, Selden NR, Quint DJ, Patel N, Gillespie B, Grube S. Immediate spinal cord decompression for cervical spinal cord injury: feasibility and outcome. J Trauma 2002; 52: 323-332
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Rosenfeld JF, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ, Klein GR, Cotler JM. The benefits of early decompression in cervical spinal cord injury. Am J Orthop 1998; 27: 23-28
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Heiden JS, Weiss MH, Rosenberg AW, Apuzzo ML, Kurze T. Management of cervical spinal cord trauma in Southern California. J Neurosurg 1975; 43: 732-736
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Marshall LF, Knowlton S, Garfin SR, Klauber MR, Eisenberg HM, Kopaniky D. et al A multicenter study. J Neurosurg 1987; 66: 400-404
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Wilmot CB, Hall KM. Evaluation of the acute management of tetraplegia: conservative versus surgical treatment. Paraplegia 1986; 24: 148-153
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Wagner Jr FC, Chehrazi B. Early decompression and neurological outcome in acute cervical spinal cord injuries. J Neurosurg 1982; 56: 699-705
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Maynard FM, Reynolds GG, Fountain S, Wilmot C, Hamilton R. Neurological prognosis after traumatic quadriplegia. Three-year experience of California Regional Spinal Cord Injury Care System. J Neurosurg 1979; 50: 611-616
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Vaccaro AR, Daugherty RJ, Sheehan TP. et al Neurologic outcome of early versus late surgery for cervical spinal cord injury. Spine 1997; 22: 2609-2613
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Bohlman HH, Bahniuk E, Raskulinecz G, Field G. Mechanical factors affecting recovery from incomplete cervical spinal cord injury: a preliminary report. Johns Hopkins Med J 1979; 145: 115-125
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Delamarter RB, Sherman J, Carr JB. Recovery after immediate and delayed decompression. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77: 1042-1049
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Aebi M, Mohler J, Zach GA, Morscher E. Indication, surgical technique, and results of 100 surgically-treated fractures and fracture-dislocations of the cervical spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; 203: 244-257
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Anderson PA, Bohlman HH. Anterior decompression and arthrodesis of the cervical spine: long-term motor improvement. Part II. Improvement in complete traumatic quadriplegia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992; 74: 683-692
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Bohlman HH. Acute fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. An analysis of three hundred hospitalized patients and review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979; 61: 1119-1142
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Brodkey JS, Miller Jr CF, Harmody RM. The syndrome of acute central cervical spinal cord injury revisited. Surg Neurol 1980; 14: 251-257
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Farmer J, Vaccaro A, Albert TJ, Malone S, Balderston RA, Cotler JM. Neurologic deterioration after cervical spinal cord injury. J Spinal Disord 1998; 11: 192-196
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Beatson TR. Fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1963; 45: 21-35
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Beyer CA, Cabanela ME, Berquist TH. Unilateral facet dislocations and fracture-dislocations of the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73: 977-981
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Garvey TA, Eismont FJ, Roberti LJ. Anterior decompression, structural bone grafting, and Caspar plate stabilization for unstable cervical spine fractures and/or dislocations. Spine 1992; 17 (Suppl. 10) S431-S435
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Brunette DD, Rockswold GL. Neurologic recovery following rapid spinal realignment for complete cervical spinal cord injury. J Trauma 1987; 27: 445-447
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Cotler JM, Herbison GJ, Nasuti JF, Ditunno Jr JF, An H, Wolff BE. Closed reduction of traumatic cervical spine dislocation using traction weights up to 140 pounds. Spine 1993; 18: 386-390
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, Collins WF. et al Results of the Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 1405-1411
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar