Reproducibility of gait analysis variables: One-step versus three-step method of data acquisition

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1067-2516(02)80016-3Get rights and content

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the preciseness and repeatability of EMED-SF platform data collection using two different protocols. Gait variables of five healthy women and five men, with an average age of 27.3 ± 3.2 years, weighing 67.5 ± 13.3 kg, were evaluated. With a one-step and a three-step approach of data collection, peak pressure, pressure-time integral, and contact time were measured. Peak pressures were not significantly different between both methods. Significant differences were found between both methods in total contact time and pressure-time integral. Both methods were comparable in peak pressures (error between methods = 7.0), while the one-step protocol was more repeatable (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.59) than the three-step protocol (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.36). The error between methods for total contact time and pressure-time integral were 143.3 and 50.1, respectively, suggesting that the two protocols lead to different results. The one-step protocol (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.40) had a higher repeatability than the three-step protocol (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.31). The one-step protocol has some advantages over the three-step protocol as far as repeatability, simplicity, convenience, and time conservation are concerned. For measuring total contact time and pressure-time integrals, both methods have comparable repeatability, although the protocols lead to different outcomes.

References (29)

  • K. Mueller et al.

    Effect of a tone-inhibiting dynamic ankle-foot orthosis on the foot-loading pattern of a hemiplegie adult: a preliminary study

    J. Prosthet. Orthot.

    (1992)
  • D.J. Morton

    Structural factors in static disorders of the foot

    Am. J. Surg.

    (1930)
  • R.L. Harris et al.

    Army foot survey — an investigation of foot ailments in Canadian Soldiers

  • R.P. Betts et al.

    Analysis of pressures and loads under the foot. Part 1: Quantitation of the static distribution using the PET computer

    J. Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas.

    (1980)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Department of Orthopaedics, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX.

    2

    Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    3

    Austin Diagnostic Clinic, Austin, TX.

    4

    Foot & Ankle Associates, Jacksonville, IL.

    5

    Diabetex Foot Care Center, San Antonio, TX.

    View full text