Elsevier

The Lancet Oncology

Volume 11, Issue 1, January 2010, Pages 92-102
The Lancet Oncology

Review
Use of new imaging techniques to predict tumour response to therapy

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70190-1Get rights and content

Summary

Imaging of tumour response to therapy has steadily evolved over the past few years as a result of advances in existing imaging modalities and the introduction of new functional techniques. The use of imaging as an early surrogate biomarker of response is appealing, because it might allow for a window of opportunity during which treatment regimens can be tailored accordingly, depending on the expected response. The clinical effect of this would ultimately result in a reduction in morbidity and undue costs. The aim of this review is to describe the potential of various new imaging techniques as biomarkers of early tumour response. We have reviewed the literature and identified studies that have assessed these techniques, such as diffusion-weighted MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and 18-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET as early response indicators, and highlight the current clinical awareness of their use.

Introduction

The ability to rapidly and accurately predict the response of a tumour to therapy would have immense value in clinical practice. Persisting with ineffective treatment is associated with increased toxic effects and morbidity, accelerated tumour growth, a delay in commencing alternative, potentially effective treatment, and unnecessary expense. Additionally, because of tumour heterogeneity, all cancers of a particular type rarely respond to the recommended therapy,1 emphasising the urgent need for a reliable, accurate, and early predictor of tumour response, which would enable the development of individualised regimens.

Imaging has a fundamental role in oncology, especially in the assessment of tumour response to therapy. By using tumour shrinkage as a standard endpoint of response, current conventional imaging follow-up is based on morphological criteria, with changes in tumour dimension determining response or progression. Unfortunately, this traditional method of quantifying tumour response is hampered by various limitations of using size change as a response variable. For example, observer variation can lead to inaccuracy, and infiltrative, irregular lesions can be difficult or almost impossible to measure. Crucially, changes in gross tumour size are notably delayed and substantially lag behind the biological and molecular changes that are known to occur early in responders.2, 3

New functional and metabolic imaging techniques that have the ability to integrate pathological, physiological, and morphological changes, offer substantial potential as early predictors of therapy response (figure 1). These include diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI), which assesses water motion and tumour cellularity, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), which assesses the biodistribution of contrast within tumours, magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), which analyses the relative amount of chemical components within biological tissues, and 18-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET ([18F]FDG-PET), which provides an indication of the metabolic and proliferative activity within tumours. Recent advances in the development of these functional techniques have provided an ability to detect microscopic changes in tumour microenvironment and tissue cytoarchitecture, allowing earlier assessment of therapy response by observing alterations in perfusion, oxygenation, and metabolism.

The concept of an imaging biomarker is especially attractive, because it can allow for customised treatment regimens according to the predicted response, and aid the development of improved clinical trials of new therapeutic agents by providing an accurate response indicator. Another appealing factor is the ability of several of these imaging modalities to capture and quantify regional tumour heterogeneity and the changes that occur after treatment. This review aims to highlight the use of these emerging techniques in oncology, with emphasis on the current understanding of their clinical usefulness as predictors or early biomarkers of response.

Section snippets

Diffusion-weighted MRI

DW-MRI is sensitive to the microscopic motion of water molecules, and allows for non-invasive characterisation of biological tissues on the basis of their water-diffusion properties.4, 5 By exploiting information about tissue cellularity and the integrity of cellular membranes, DW-MRI can be used to characterise highly cellular and acellular regions of tumours, distinguish cystic from solid regions, and monitor change in cellularity within the tumour over time, which is reflective of response

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI

DCE-MRI has the ability to non-invasively characterise tissue vasculature, including the antiangiogenic response of tumour tissue during therapeutic intervention. By providing additional insight into tumour perfusion and capillary permeability, this technique allows assessment of treatment response more readily than indirect and delayed assessments of tumour size.

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy

MRS is an application of MRI that is able to provide chemical information about tissue metabolites. Whereas conventional MRI offers an illustration of gross anatomy, by detecting the nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of water in tissues, MRS alternatively detects the resonance spectra of chemical compounds except water, allowing for a true representation of the chemical and molecular composition of tissues. Although initially developed for neurological applications, the scope of MRS has been

FDG-PET

PET has the ability to assess tissue metabolism by using radiolabelled molecules to image biological processes in vivo, with most PET imaging studies using [18F]FDG, a glucose analogue. [18F]FDG-PET has been shown to be of value in the differentiation of benign and malignant tissue, preoperative staging, detecting recurrent disease, and, more recently, in the identification of early tumour response to therapy.

Conclusion

Current conventional structural imaging, done at a single timepoint, does not adequately provide information on the likelihood of tumour response to therapeutic intervention, because details on the molecular, physiological, and biological characteristics are not available. This is exemplified by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) criteria for assessing tumour response, which is based only on unidimensional size measurement of a lesion and does not take into account

Search strategy and selection criteria

References for this review were identified by searches of PubMed using the radiological search terms “MRI”, “magnetic resonance”, “diffusion-weighted MRI”, “DWI”, “dynamic”, “contrast-enhanced”, “DCE-MRI”, “spectroscopy”, “MRS”, “positron emission tomography”, “PET”, and “FDG-PET”, and the oncological search terms “cancer”, “response”, “predict”, and “biomarker”. Only papers published between January, 1987, and August, 2009, were included. Additional articles were identified from the

References (88)

  • PA Hein et al.

    Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for monitoring diffusion changes in rectal carcinoma during combined, preoperative chemoradiation: preliminary results of a prospective study

    Eur J Radiol

    (2003)
  • VN Harry et al.

    Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the early detection of response to chemoradiation in cervical cancer

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2008)
  • T Nagashima et al.

    Dynamic enhanced MRI predicts chemosensitivity in breast cancer patients

    Eur J Radiol

    (2006)
  • N Tomura et al.

    Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapeutic efficacy in the head and neck tumors

    Am J Otolaryngol

    (2005)
  • NA Mayr et al.

    Tumor perfusion studies using fast magnetic resonance imaging technique in advanced cervical cancer: a new noninvasive predictive assay

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (1996)
  • JA Loncaster et al.

    Prediction of radiotherapy outcome using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of carcinoma of the cervix

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2002)
  • A Shukla-Dave et al.

    Prediction of treatment response of head and neck cancers with P-31 MR spectroscopy from pretreatment relative phosphomonoester levels

    Acad Radiol

    (2002)
  • F Arias-Mendoza et al.

    Predicting treatment response in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma from the pretreatment tumor content of phosphoethanolamine plus phosphocholine

    Acad Radiol

    (2004)
  • H Young et al.

    Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group

    Eur J Cancer

    (1999)
  • ZJ Zhang et al.

    18F-FDG uptake as a biologic factor predicting outcome in patients with resected non-small-cell lung cancer

    Chin Med J (Engl)

    (2007)
  • N Rizk et al.

    Preoperative 18[F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography standardized uptake values predict survival after oesophageal adenocarcinoma resection

    Ann Thorac Surg

    (2006)
  • MK Kim et al.

    Value of complete metabolic response by (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in oesophageal cancer for prediction of pathologic response and survival after preoperative chemoradiotherapy

    Eur J Cancer

    (2007)
  • F Xue et al.

    F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in primary cervical cancer as an indicator of prognosis after radiation therapy

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2006)
  • SI Semple et al.

    Baseline MRI delivery characteristics predict change in invasive ductal breast carcinoma PET metabolism as a result of primary chemotherapy administration

    Ann Oncol

    (2006)
  • GH Heppner et al.

    The cellular basis of tumor progression

    Int Rev Cytol

    (1998)
  • TL Chenevert et al.

    Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: an early surrogate marker of therapeutic efficacy in brain tumors

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (2000)
  • DA Hamstra et al.

    Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: a biomarker for treatment response in oncology

    J Clin Oncol

    (2007)
  • TL Chenevert et al.

    Monitoring early response of experimental brain tumors to therapy using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging

    Clin Cancer Res

    (1997)
  • Y Mardor et al.

    Early detection of response to radiation therapy in patients with brain malignancies using conventional and high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging

    J Clin Oncol

    (2003)
  • BA Moffat et al.

    Functional diffusion map: a noninvasive MRI biomarker for early stratification of clinical brain tumor response

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2005)
  • DA Hamstra et al.

    Evaluation of the functional diffusion map as an early biomarker of time-to-progression and overall survival in high-grade glioma

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2005)
  • N Tomura et al.

    Diffusion changes in a tumor and peritumoral tissue after stereotactic irradiation for brain tumors: possible prediction of treatment response

    J Comput Assist Tomogr

    (2006)
  • PA Hein et al.

    [Diffusion-weighted MRI—a new parameter for advanced rectal carcinoma?]

    Rofo

    (2003)
  • C Kremser et al.

    Preliminary results on the influence of chemoradiation on apparent diffusion coefficients of primary rectal carcinoma measured by magnetic resonance imaging

    Strahlenther Onkol

    (2003)
  • M Uhl et al.

    Evaluation of tumour necrosis during chemotherapy with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: preliminary results in osteosarcomas

    Pediatr Radiol

    (2006)
  • T Sugahara et al.

    Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas

    J Magn Reson Imaging

    (1999)
  • Y Hayashida et al.

    Monitoring therapeutic responses of primary bone tumors by diffusion-weighted image: initial results

    Eur Radiol

    (2006)
  • BD Ross et al.

    Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy: application to experimental neuro-oncology

    Q Magn Reson Biol Med

    (1994)
  • AM Chinnaiyan et al.

    Combined effect of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand and ionizing radiation in breast cancer therapy

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2000)
  • M Uhl et al.

    MRI-diffusion imaging of neuroblastomas: first results and correlation to histology

    Eur Radiol

    (2002)
  • G Manenti et al.

    In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant prostatic tissue using thin-slice echo-planar imaging

    Radiol Med (Torino)

    (2006)
  • PS Tofts et al.

    Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts

    Magn Reson Med

    (1991)
  • MD Pickles et al.

    Role of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in monitoring early response of locally advanced breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

    Breast Cancer Res Treat

    (2005)
  • ML George et al.

    Non-invasive methods of assessing angiogenesis and their value in predicting response to treatment in colorectal cancer

    Br J Surg

    (2001)
  • Cited by (149)

    • Prognostic and therapeutic evaluation of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE), diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)

      2021, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
      Citation Excerpt :

      The recent breakthrough in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) assessment facilitates close monitoring of tumour physiological changes [6,7]. In addition to acquiring morphological changes, functional MRI monitors therapeutic response and detects persistent tumour by measuring physiological changes in tumour microenvironment [6,8]. Among different functional MRI assessments, dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) are most often described.

    • Menstruation: science and society

      2020, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
    • Functional nanostructures for drug resistance breast cancer theranostics

      2020, Nanomedicines for Breast Cancer Theranostics
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text