Fast track — ArticlesStandard graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis with or without anti-T-cell globulin in haematopoietic cell transplantation from matched unrelated donors: a randomised, open-label, multicentre phase 3 trial
Introduction
Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation. Haematopoietic cell transplantation from unrelated donors results in an increased risk of severe GVHD compared with matched sibling donor transplants using the same regimen for GVHD prophylaxis, which usually contains ciclosporin and short-course methotrexate.1, 2, 3 Strategies using intensified GVHD prophylaxis including T-cell depletion did not result in better outcome due to increased risks of infection and relapse.4, 5 Different types of anti-T-cell globulin (ATG) preparations have been tested as part of conditioning regimens to achieve in-vivo T-cell depletion to prevent GVHD. ATG preparations can differ substantially in potency and dose due to different production methods, namely the cells used for immunisation of the source animal. In a sequential randomised trial testing two doses of ATG (Thymoglobulin; Genzyme, Boston, MA, USA) in 109 patients, the lower dose of ATG did not lead to a difference in incidence and severity of acute GVHD compared with standard prophylaxis, whereas the higher dose reduced severe GVHD but was accompanied by a higher risk of lethal infections.6
The use of rabbit anti-Jurkat cell-line T-lymphoblasts, or ATG-Fresenius (ATG-F; Fresenius Biotech, Graefelfing, Germany) in addition to ciclosporin and methotrexate has shown promising results in several phase 2 trials for transplantation from matched or mismatched unrelated donors.7, 8 A dose of 60 mg/kg was found to be effective for reducing severe GVHD in a dose-escalation study in patients transplanted with marrow from unrelated donors.9
Here we report the results of, to our knowledge, the first large prospective, randomised, multi-centre, open-label, phase 3 trial comparing standard GVHD prophylaxis with ciclosporin and short-course methotrexate, with or without ATG-F at a cumulative dose of 60 mg/kg.
Section snippets
Patients
A randomised, multi-centre, open-label, phase 3 trial to compare standard GVHD prophylaxis plus pre-transplant ATG-F with standard GVHD prophylaxis alone (control) was set up in patients receiving myeloablative conditioning before haematopoietic cell transplantation from matched unrelated donors. All patients received ciclosporin starting one day before transplantation, with target trough concentrations 200 ng/mL or greater in combination with methotrexate 15 mg/m2 one day after transplantation
Results
202 patients were recruited from 31 centres. One centre recruited 30 patients, six centres recruited 11–20 patients, six centres recruited six to ten patients, and 18 centres recruited less than six patients. Figure 1 shows the trial profile. The full analysis set consists of 201 patients (ATG-F n=103, control n=98). Median follow-up for secondary endpoints was 2 years (range 0·42–4·53). Patient, disease, and transplant characteristics are summarised in table 1.
Engraftment with neutrophils at
Discussion
The primary composite efficacy endpoint severe aGVHD grade III–IV or death within 100 days after transplantation, was not significantly improved in the ATG-F group compared with the control group (OR 0·59, 95% CI 0·30–1·17; p=0·13). The primary aim of the study was to investigate whether adding ATG-F to standard GVHD prophylaxis resulted in a reduction of aGVHD. However, it also had to be ensured that ATG-F treatment did not decrease the risk of aGVHD by increasing the risk of the competing
References (30)
- et al.
Analysis of 462 transplantations from unrelated donors facilitated by the National Marrow Donor Program
N Engl J Med
(1993) - et al.
Allogeneic marrow stem-cell transplantation from human leukocyte antigen-identical siblings versus human leukocyte antigen-allelic-matched unrelated donors (10/10) in patients with standard-risk hematologic malignancy: a prospective study from the French Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cell Therapy
J Clin Oncol
(2006) - et al.
HLA-identical sibling compared with 8/8 matched and mismatched unrelated donor bone marrow transplant for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia
J Clin Oncol
(2009) - et al.
The history and future of T-cell depletion as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Blood
(2001) - et al.
Comparison of T-cell-depleted and non-T-cell-depleted unrelated donor transplantation for hematologic diseases: clinical outcomes, quality of life, and costs
Blood
(2002) - et al.
Antithymocyte globulin for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in transplants from unrelated donors: 2 randomized studies from Gruppo Italiano Trapianti Midollo Osseo (GITMO)
Blood
(2001) - et al.
Matched and mismatched allogeneic stem-cell transplantation from unrelated donors using combined graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis including rabbit anti-T lymphocyte globulin
J Clin Oncol
(2003) - et al.
ATG as part of the conditioning regimen reduces transplant-related mortality (TRM) and improves overall survival after unrelated stem cell transplantation in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML)
Bone Marrow Transplant
(2003) - et al.
Dose-dependent effects of in vivo antithymocyte globulin during conditioning for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from unrelated donors in patients with chronic phase CML
Bone Marrow Transplant
(2003) - et al.
Clinical manifestations of graft-versus-host disease in human recipients of marrow from HL-A-matched sibling donors
Transplantation
(1974)
National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. Diagnosis and staging working group report
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant
Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators
Stat Med
A proportional hazards model for subdistribution of competing risk
J Am Stat Assoc
Adjusted survival curve estimation using covariates
J Chronic Dis
SAS macros for estimation of the cumulative incidence functions based on a Cox regression model for competing risks survival data
Comput Methods Programs Biomed
Cited by (0)
- ‡
For full list of investigators see webappendix