In Context

Traumatic brain injury: the signature of modern conflicts

Military neurosurgery has played a crucial role in the development of neurosurgery over time. Much of this progress is due to war-related experiences. Owing to the number and severity of war injuries and the limitations caused by war, surgeons have had to examine different methods and design special protocols for patient management. Given that in recent decades most wars have taken place in the Middle East, many lessons can be learned by reviewing the experiences of neurosurgeons in these wars. Wars in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Lebanon, and Yemen have been the largest and longest conflicts in the Middle East since the beginning of the 21st century, and a number of studies reported the experiences of surgeons in these wars. In this study, we reviewed the experience of military surgeons in managing war neurosurgical injuries in these areas within the last 2 decades.

Craniofacial trauma results in distracting injuries that are easy to see, and as oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMFS) we gravitate towards injuries that can be seen and are treatable surgically. However, we do tend not to involve ourselves (and may potentially overlook) injuries that are not obvious either visually or radiographically, and concussion is one such. We reviewed the records of 500 consecutive patients who presented with facial fractures at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, to identify whether patients had been screened for concussion, and how they had been managed. Of the 500 cases 186 (37%) had concussion, and 174 (35%) had a more severe traumatic brain injury. The maxillofacial team documented loss of consciousness in 314 (63%) and pupillary reactions in 215 (43%). Ninety-three (19%) were referred for a neurosurgical opinion, although most of these were patients who presented with a Glasgow coma scale (GCS) of ≤13. Only 37 patients (7%) were referred to the traumatic brain injury clinic. Recent reports have indicated that 15% of all patients diagnosed with concussion have symptoms that persist for longer than two weeks. These can have far-reaching effects on recovery, and have an appreciable effect on the psychosocial aspects of the patients’ lives. As we have found, over one third of patients with craniofacial trauma are concussed. We think, therefore, that all patients who have been referred to OMFS with craniofacial trauma should be screened for concussion on admission, and at the OMFS follow up clinic. In addition, there should be an agreement between consultants that such patients should be referred to the traumatic brain injury clinic for follow up.