Fast track — ArticlesSingle-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation for acute treatment of migraine with aura: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, sham-controlled trial
Introduction
Migraine is a primary headache disorder affecting about 18% of women and 6% of men in the USA and western Europe,1, 2 and it consists of two major forms—migraine without aura and migraine with aura.3 Migraine with aura is characterised by reversible focal neurological features that usually precede the onset of headache.3 Usually, symptoms of visual aura include spots of light, zigzag lines, or regions of visual loss (scotomas); non-visual symptoms include somatosensory features (tingling and numbness) and language or motor effects (weakness).4 Migraine with aura affects about 20–30% of patients.
The presumed substrate of migraine with aura is cortical spreading depression.5, 6 This effect consists of a wave of excitation followed by a wave of inhibition of both neurons and glia, which spreads across the cortical mantle. Work in animals suggests that cortical spreading depression depolarises meningeal nociceptors giving rise to migraine pain,7 and that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) disrupts this depression wave.8
TMS is a non-invasive technique that applies a brief magnetic pulse to the scalp and underlying cortex, changing the pattern of neuronal firing. Since its discovery in 1985, it has been used for anatomic brain mapping and for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.9 TMS was tested in individuals with migraine based on the hypothesis that a fluctuating magnetic field delivered by the device, when applied to the back of the head, would induce electrical current and disrupt cortical spreading depression. In view of its ability to disrupt the depression wave, TMS has promise as a non-invasive, non-pharmacological, and safe treatment for migraine.10 We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a novel, portable, single-pulse TMS (sTMS) device for acute treatment of migraine with aura.
Section snippets
Patients
We did a randomised, sham-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study in two phases at 18 centres in the USA. Patients were eligible for the study if they were aged 18–70 years and met International Classification of Headache Disorders (second edition) criteria for migraine with aura (classification code 1.2.1).3 They had to have between one and eight migraine episodes per month, with aura preceding migraine for at least 30% of episodes, followed by moderate or severe headache in 90% of
Results
Between August, 2006, and February, 2008, 276 patients from 16 centres in the USA (two centres did not enrol any patients) were screened for inclusion in phase one of the study. Figure 1 shows the movement of individuals through the study. 267 participants were enrolled, of whom 201 were randomly allocated into phase two (safety analysis set). Of this population, 164 (82 sTMS and 82 sham) treated at least one aura episode (modified intention-to-treat analysis set). Three patients in the sham
Discussion
Our findings show that sTMS was significantly more effective than sham stimulation for treatment of migraine with aura, as judged by the primary outcome—the proportion of patients who were pain free at 2 h post-treatment for the first treated attack. This pain-free period was sustained (24 h and 48 h after treatment) in more participants allocated sTMS versus sham stimulation. Compared with sham-treated participants, the pain-free response with sTMS was highest for the subgroup who used
References (22)
- et al.
The clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee
Clin Neurophysiol
(2008) - et al.
Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventative therapy
Neurology
(2007) - et al.
The global burden of headache: a documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide
Cephalalgia
(2007) The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition
Cephalalgia
(2004)Migraine with aura: new understanding from clinical epidemiologic studies
Curr Opin Neurol
(2006)Spreading depression of activity in cerebral cortex
J Neurophysiol
(1944)- et al.
Pathophysiology of aura
- et al.
Intrinsic brain activity triggers trigeminal meningeal afferents in a migraine model
Nat Med
(2002) - et al.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of migraine aura
Neurology
(2009) Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5–7, 1996
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol
(1998)