Factors involved in abdominal wall closure and subsequent incisional hernia
References (31)
- et al.
Choosing the best abdominal closure by meta-analysis
Am J Surg
(1998) - et al.
Influence of abdominal wound closure technique on complications after surgery: a randomised study
Lancet
(1999) - et al.
Polydioxanone or polypropylene for closure of midline abdominal incisions: a prospective comparative clinical trial
Br J Surg
(1987) - et al.
Fascia closure after midline laparotomy: results of a randomised trial
Br J Surg
(1987) - et al.
Closure of midline laparotomy incisions with polydioxanone and nylon: the importance of suture technique
Br J Surg
(1994) - et al.
Towards no incisional hernias: lateral paramedian versus midline incisions
JR Soc Med
(1986) - et al.
Suture length to wound length ratio and integrity of midline and lateral paramedian incisions
Br J Surg
(1991) - et al.
Lateral paramedian incision
Br J Surg
(1987) - et al.
Vertical abdominal incisions — a choice?
Br J Surg
(1980) - et al.
Incisional hernia: a 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudes
Br J Surg
(1985)
A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia
New Eng J Med
Midline or transverse laparotomy? A random controlled clinical trial. Part 1: influence on healing
Br J Surg
Abdominal incisions — vertical or transverse?
Postgrad Med J
The lateral paramedian incision — experience with 850 cases
Br J Surg
Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease
J Natl Cancer Inst
Cited by (87)
Appendicitis in an incisional hernia sac following renal transplantation: A case report and brief review of the literature
2021, Radiology Case ReportsCitation Excerpt :Midline incision is associated with higher rate of incisional hernia as compared to transverse, paramedian or oblique incision [10]. Conventionally, Pfannenstiel incision, used with gynecological procedures has the lowest incidence of incisional site hernia [10]. A systemic review in patients with renal transplant, revealed incisional hernia incidence of 1.1%-7% (mean 3.2%), significantly lower as compared to patients with midline laparotomy [11].
External Validation of the HERNIAscore: An Observational Study
2017, Journal of the American College of SurgeonsCitation Excerpt :Our HERNIAscore models remain important scoring systems because they are among the few, if not only, models to include only preoperative and easily predictable intraoperative factors. Other scoring systems evaluate additional preoperative factors (eg chemotherapy, age, sex, thickness of subcutaneous fat, malnutrition, tobacco use, liver disease, ostomy reversal, and acute gastrointestinal inflammatory process), operative factors (eg wound class, blood transfusion, suture type, and continuous vs interrupted suture), and postoperative factors (eg surgical site infection).1,2,4,6,7 These other scoring systems use either variables that are difficult to obtain or variables that cannot be easily determined before the operation.
Acquired abdominal wall hernia
2023, Small Animal Soft Tissue SurgeryINCARCERATED GRAVID UTERUS IN VENTRAL HERNIA
2023, Journal of Ayub Medical College