Review Article
Advances in preoperative assessment of liver function

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1499-3872(14)60267-8Get rights and content

Background

Postoperative liver failure remains a life-threatening complication. Preoperative evaluation of liver function is essential in reducing the complications after hepatectomy. However, it is difficult to accurately evaluate liver function before surgery because of the limitations of the liver function tests available. Recent advances in liver function tests improved the ability to assess liver function. The present review was to analyze these methods and their advantages.

Data Sources

MEDLINE was searched using the terms of “liver function test”, “liver function evaluation” and “galactosyl serum albumin”. Relevant articles published in English and Chinese from 1961 to 2014 were reviewed.

Results

Although serological tests are used frequently in practice, they reflect the degree of total liver damage or function, not the remnant of liver function. Child-Pugh score and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score assess whole liver function, and are particularly useful in determining whether patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis are candidates for resection or transplantation, but cannot determine the safe extent or removal. The indocyanine green and other metabolic quantitative liver function tests can evaluate functional hepatocytes, making them more accurate in predicting liver function. Computed tomography (CT) volumetry can provide anatomic information on the remnant liver volume but not on functional volume. 99mTc-galactosyl serum albumin scintigraphy, combined with single photon emission computed tomography, CT and three-dimensional reconstruction, may be a better quantitative measure of liver function, especially of remnant liver function.

Conclusions

Tests used to evaluate liver functional reserve and to predict surgical risk have limitations. 99mTc-galactosyl serum albumin scintigraphy, which can more accurately evaluate the whole and regional liver function, may be promising in predicting resection margins and risks of liver failure.

References (69)

  • M Kudo et al.

    Synthesis and radiolabeling of galactosyl human serum albumin

    Methods Enzymol

    (1994)
  • AH Kwon et al.

    Use of technetium 99m diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid-galactosyl-human serum albumin liver scintigraphy in the evaluation of preoperative and postoperative hepatic functional reserve for hepatectomy

    Surgery

    (1995)
  • A Nanashima et al.

    Relationship between indocyanine green test and technetium-99m galactosyl serum albumin scintigraphy in patients scheduled for hepatectomy: Clinical evaluation and patient outcome

    Hepatol Res

    (2004)
  • AH Kwon et al.

    Preoperative regional maximal removal rate of technetium-99m-galactosyl human serum albumin (GSA-Rmax) is useful for judging the safety of hepatic resection

    Surgery

    (2006)
  • AH Kwon et al.

    Functional hepatic volume measured by technetium-99m-galactosyl-human serum albumin liver scintigraphy: comparison between hepatocyte volume and liver volume by computed tomography

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2001)
  • W de Graaf et al.

    Assessment of future remnant liver function using hepatobiliary scintigraphy in patients undergoing major liver resection

    J Gastrointest Surg

    (2010)
  • J Byam et al.

    Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

    Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr

    (2013)
  • Y Fujii et al.

    Risk factors of posthepatectomy liver failure after portal vein embolization

    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg

    (2003)
  • PA Clavien et al.

    Strategies for safer liver surgery and partial liver transplantation

    N Engl J Med

    (2007)
  • N Chand et al.

    Sepsis-induced cholestasis

    Hepatology

    (2007)
  • WY Lau

    Hepatocellular carcinoma

    (2008)
  • CG Child et al.

    Surgery and portal hypertension

    Major Probl Clin Surg

    (1964)
  • RN Pugh et al.

    Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices

    Br J Surg

    (1973)
  • M Malinchoc et al.

    A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts

    Hepatology

    (2000)
  • P Dutkowski et al.

    The model for end-stage liver disease allocation system for liver transplantation saves lives, but increases morbidity and cost: a prospective outcome analysis

    Liver Transpl

    (2011)
  • WR Kim et al.

    Hyponatremia and mortality among patients on the liver-transplant waiting list

    N Engl J Med

    (2008)
  • TI Huo et al.

    Comparison of four model for end-stage liver disease-based prognostic systems for cirrhosis

    Liver Transpl

    (2008)
  • T Mizuguchi et al.

    Preoperative liver function assessments to estimate the prognosis and safety of liver resections

    Surg Today

    (2014)
  • M Abradelo et al.

    Splitting liver grafts for two adults: suboptimal grafts or suboptimal matching?

    Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr

    (2013)
  • G Paumgartner

    The handling of indocyanine green by the liver

    Schweiz Med Wochenschr

    (1975)
  • H Akita et al.

    Real-time intraoperative assessment of residual liver functional reserve using pulse dye densitometry

    World J Surg

    (2008)
  • EH Wissler

    Identifying a long standing error in single-bolus determination of the hepatic extraction ratio for indocyanine green

    Eur J Appl Physiol

    (2011)
  • K Sathirakul et al.

    Kinetic analysis of hepatobiliary transport of organic anions in Eisai hyperbilirubinemic mutant rats

    J Pharmacol Exp Ther

    (1993)
  • H Kusuhara et al.

    Pharmacokinetic modeling of the hepatobiliary transport mediated by cooperation of uptake and efflux transporters

    Drug Metab Rev

    (2010)
  • Cited by (61)

    • Gadoxetic Acid Uptake Rate as a Measure of Global and Regional Liver Function as Compared With Indocyanine Green Retention, Albumin-Bilirubin Score, and Portal Venous Perfusion

      2022, Advances in Radiation Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Using this strategy, separate patients cannot be assumed to have the uniform liver function and radiation dose response. Furthermore, a patient cannot be assumed to have homogeneous hepatic function and dose-response throughout the liver.6-10 These approaches require measures of global and regional liver function as well as radiation dose response in individual patients while considering all these factors in treatment planning.

    • Value of Liver Function Tests in Cirrhosis

      2022, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology
    • Future liver remnant function as a predictor of postoperative morbidity following liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma – A risk factor analysis

      2020, Surgical Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Apart from volume/function analysis, preoperative laboratory parameters are routinely used to estimate liver function, but are more reflective of the degree of hepatic damage than of global liver function [36]. Scoring systems such as MELD score and CTP score has been tested in a variety of clinical settings ranging from survival to quality of life, but have failed to predict postoperative outcome [36,47,48]. In line with these findings, preoperative laboratory parameters and MELD score were not predictive of postoperative morbidity in this study (Tables 2–4).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Published online June 23, 2014.

    View full text