Reproducibility of twitch and sniff transdiaphragmatic pressures

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1569-9048(02)00115-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure (Tw Pdi) measured with magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerve is used to follow up patients and to assess the effect of clinical treatments on diaphragm function. However the reproducibility of Tw Pdi on different occasions has been little studied. We investigated 32 normal subjects, measuring Tw Pdi elicited by bilateral magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerves on two to 14 occasions. Sniff transdiaphragmatic pressure (sniff Pdi) was also measured. The mean value of Tw Pdi and sniff Pdi were 28±5 and 134±24 cm H2O, respectively. The within subjects coefficient of variation was 11% for both Tw Pdi and sniff Pdi. We conclude that there is a variability of Tw Pdi and the variability of Tw Pdi is the same as that of sniff Pdi.

Introduction

Transdiaphragmatic pressure elicited by phrenic nerve stimulation (Tw Pdi) is a non-volitional test and is considered to be a sensitive and reliable technique for assessment of diaphragm function (NHLBI Workshop summary, 1990, Polkey et al., 1995). Tw Pdi has been frequently used to assess diaphragm strength (Aubier et al., 1985, Mier et al., 1989, Similowski et al., 1989) and detect diaphragm fatigue (Hamnegard et al., 1996, Mador et al., 1996, Luo et al., 2001). Recently, Tw Pdi has been used to evaluate the effect of clinical treatments and respiratory muscle training. For example, the effect of lung volume reduction surgery on diaphragm function has been assessed by measuring Tw Pdi before and 3 or 6 months after operation (Criner et al., 1998, Laghi et al., 1998). However, accurate assessment of diaphragm function requires good reproducibility of Tw Pdi not only within occasion but also between occasions. Many studies have shown that Tw Pdi elicited by magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerves has good reproducibility within occasion (Mador et al., 1996, Criner et al., 1999) but reproducibility between occasions has not been systematically investigated.

Sniff Pdi (Miller et al., 1985) is also often used to assess diaphragm function and to follow up patients. Although it is assumed that Tw Pdi, a non-volitional test, is likely to be more reproducible than Sniff Pdi (Polkey et al., 1995), no study has assessed this. In the present study we investigated repeatability of Tw Pdi and sniff Pdi to determine whether Tw Pdi was more reproducible than sniff Pdi.

Section snippets

Subjects

The results from 32 healthy volunteers studied in our laboratory constitute the data for this study. Most of the subjects were staff of the respiratory muscle laboratories at King's College Hospital or Brompton Hospital. No subject had neuromuscular or respiratory disease. The study was approved by the ethics committee of King's College Hospital and all subjects gave their informed consent.

Bilateral anterolateral magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerves (BAMPS)

BAMPS was performed using two 43 mm figures of eight coils powered by Magstim 200 stimulators (Magstim,

Result

Reproducibility of Tw Pdi is summarised in Table 1. The mean Tw Pdi for all subjects was 28±5 cm H2O with a range of 18–42 cm H2O for all individual occasions. The maximal change of Tw Pdi between occasions was up to 41%. The mean sniff Pdi was 134±24 cm H2O with a range of 86–195 cm H2O. The maximal change of sniff Pdi between occasions was up to 40%. The within subjects coefficient of variation was the same for both Tw Pdi and sniff Pdi and was 11%. The agreement in Tw Pdi and sniff Pdi

Discussion

In the present study we found that twitch Pdi and sniff Pdi have similar variability between occasions. Previous investigators have studied the reproducibility of Tw Pdi elicited by electrical stimulation (Aubier et al., 1985, Mier et al., 1989, Eastwood et al., 1995, Mills et al., 1995). It is difficult for electric stimulation to maximally activate the phrenic nerve (Bellemare and Bigland-Ritchie, 1987, Laghi et al., 1996). Furthermore, twitch potentiation can increase twitch Pdi (Wragg et

References (26)

  • G.J. Criner et al.

    Variability of electrophrenic diaphragm twitch stimulation over time in normal subjects

    Respir. Physiol.

    (1999)
  • A. Mier et al.

    Influence of lung volume and rib cage configuration on transdiaphragmatic pressure during phrenic nerve stimulation in man

    Respir. Physiol.

    (1990)
  • M. Aubier et al.

    Bilateral phrenic stimulation: a simple technique to assess diaphragmatic fatigue in humans

    J. Appl. Physiol.

    (1985)
  • F. Bellemare et al.

    Central components of diaphragmatic fatigue assessed by phrenic nerve stimulation

    J. Appl. Physiol.

    (1987)
  • J.M. Bland et al.

    Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement

    Lancet

    (1986)
  • R. Chen et al.

    Twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure depends critically on thoracoabdominal configuration

    J. Appl. Physiol.

    (2000)
  • G. Criner et al.

    Effect of lung volume reduction surgery on diaphragm strength

    Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.

    (1998)
  • P.R. Eastwood et al.

    Application of a cervical stimulating apparatus for bilateral transcutaneous phrenic nerve stimulation

    J. Appl. Physiol.

    (1995)
  • C.H. Hamnegard et al.

    Diaphragm fatigue following maximal ventilation in man

    Eur. Respir. J.

    (1996)
  • R.D. Hubmary et al.

    Transdiaphragmatic twitch pressure: effect of lung volume and chest wall shape

    Am. Rev. Respir. Dis.

    (1989)
  • F. Laghi et al.

    Comparison of magnetic and electrical phrenic nerve stimulation in assessment of diaphragmatic contractility

    J. Appl. Physiol.

    (1996)
  • F. Laghi et al.

    Effect of lung volume reduction surgery on neuromechanical coupling of the diaphragm

    Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.

    (1998)
  • Y.M. Luo et al.

    Diaphragm electromyogram measured with unilateral magnetic stimulation

    Eur. Respir. J.

    (1999)
  • Cited by (31)

    • A Phase II randomized controlled trial for lung and diaphragm protective ventilation (Real-time Effort Driven VENTilator management)

      2020, Contemporary Clinical Trials
      Citation Excerpt :

      This provides a measure of diaphragm strength, although the stimulation is not sufficient for maximal activation and therefore is not directly measuring PiMax [23,29]. Although twitch stimulation has been applied in a limited capacity in young children, it has high variability and limited reproducibility [30–35]. The measurement of PiMax can provide insight into respiratory muscle function.

    • Transdiapragmatic pressure and contractile properties of the diaphragm following magnetic stimulation

      2019, Respiratory Physiology and Neurobiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Twitch Pdi following CEMS provides non-volitional measures of diaphragm strength and fatigue which can be monitored during patient follow-up (Gibson et al., 2002). Several studies applied twPdi recordings, mostly after CEMS of the phrenic nerves in small cohorts, (Similowski et al., 1989; Wragg et al., 1994a; Mier et al., 1989a; Luo et al., 2002) and transcranial, or cortical, MS (COMS) of the diaphragm has also been utilised. Resulting electrical muscle activity can be recorded bilaterally using surface electrodes placed at the lower costal margins, referred to as diaphragm motor evoked potentials following COMS, and diaphragm compound muscle action potentials following CEMS.

    • Maximal Inspiratory Pressure: Does the Choice of Reference Values Actually Matter?

      2017, Chest
      Citation Excerpt :

      As mentioned, results were interpreted while taking into consideration robust clinical and physiologic predictors of weakness.3,18,21,22 However, we acknowledge that the lack of criterion tests of nonvolitional strength30,32 precluded any inference regarding the diagnostic accuracy of individual reference values. It should also be recognized that MIP tends to overdiagnose weakness and combination of tests increase diagnostic precision.

    • Neural drive during continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and pressure relief CPAP

      2009, Sleep Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      The diaphragm EMG signals were amplified and band-pass filtered between 20 Hz and 1 kHz. Pes and Pga were recorded using balloon catheters which were positioned in the lower oesophagus and stomach [13,14] containing 0.8 ml and 2 ml of air, respectively, connected to differential pressure transducers. Mask pressure was measured from the port provided for the administration of supplemental oxygen in a similar fashion; these traces were not analysed by the investigators until the codes were broken by Respironics who had supplied the blinded machines (see below).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text