SOGC CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE
Active Management of the Third Stage of Labour: Prevention and Treatment of Postpartum Hemorrhage

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34329-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To review the clinical aspects of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) and provide guidelines to assist clinicians in the prevention and management of PPH. These guidelines are an update from the previous Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) clinical practice guideline on PPH, published in April 2000.

Evidence

Medline, PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ACP Journal Club, and BMJ Clinical Evidence were searched for relevant articles, with concentration on randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, and clinical practice guidelines published between 1995 and 2007. Each article was screened for relevance and the full text acquired if determined to be relevant. Each full-text article was critically appraised with use of the Jadad Scale and the levels of evidence definitions of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

Values

The quality of evidence was rated with use of the criteria described by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

Sponsor

The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.

Recommendations

Prevention of Postpartum Hemorrhage

  • 1.

    Active management of the third stage of labour (AMTSL) reduces the risk of PPH and should be offered and recommended to all women. (I-A)

  • 2.

    Oxytocin (10 IU), administered intramuscularly, is the preferred medication and route for the prevention of PPH in low-risk vaginal deliveries. Care providers should administer this medication after delivery of the anterior shoulder. (I-A)

  • 3.

    Intravenous infusion of oxytocin (20 to 40 IU in 1000 mL, 150 mL per hour) is an acceptable alternative for AMTSL. (I-B)

  • 4.

    An IV bolus of oxytocin, 5 to 10 IU (given over 1 to 2 minutes), can be used for PPH prevention after vaginal birth but is not recommended at this time with elective Caesarean section. (II-B)

  • 5.

    Ergonovine can be used for prevention of PPH but may be considered second choice to oxytocin owing to the greater risk of maternal adverse effects and of the need for manual removal of a retained placenta. Ergonovine is contraindicated in patients with hypertension. (I-A)

  • 6.

    Carbetocin, 100 μg given as an IV bolus over 1 minute, should be used instead of continuous oxytocin infusion in elective Caesarean section for the prevention of PPH and to decrease the need for therapeutic uterotonics. (I-B)

  • 7.

    For women delivering vaginally with 1 risk factor for PPH, carbetocin 100 μg IM decreases the need for uterine massage to prevent PPH when compared with continuous infusion of oxytocin. (I-B)

  • 8.

    Ergonovine, 0.2 mg IM, and misoprostol, 600 to 800 μg given by the oral, sublingual, or rectal route, may be offered as alternatives in vaginal deliveries when oxytocin is not available. (II-1B)

  • 9.

    Whenever possible, delaying cord clamping by at least 60 seconds is preferred to clamping earlier in premature newborns (< 37 weeks’ gestation) since there is less intraventricular hemorrhage and less need for transfusion in those with late clamping. (I-A)

  • 10.

    For term newborns, the possible increased risk of neonatal jaundice requiring phototherapy must be weighed against the physiological benefit of greater hemoglobin and iron levels up to 6 months of age conferred by delayed cord clamping. (I-C)

  • 11.

    There is no evidence that, in an uncomplicated delivery without bleeding, interventions to accelerate delivery of the placenta before the traditional 30 to 45 minutes will reduce the risk of PPH. (II-2C)

  • 12.

    Placental cord drainage cannot be recommended as a routine practice since the evidence for a reduction in the duration of the third stage of labour is limited to women who did not receive oxytocin as part of the management of the third stage. There is no evidence that this intervention prevents PPH. (II-1C)

  • 13.

    Intraumbilical cord injection of misoprostol (800 μg) or oxytocin (10 to 30 IU) can be considered as an alternative intervention before manual removal of the placenta. (II-2C)

Treatment of PPH

  • 14.

    For blood loss estimation, clinicians should use clinical markers (signs and symptoms) rather than a visual estimation. (III-B)

  • 15.

    Management of ongoing PPH requires a multidisciplinary approach that involves maintaining hemodynamic stability while simultaneously identifying and treating the cause of blood loss. (III-C)

  • 16.

    All obstetric units should have a regularly checked PPH emergency equipment tray containing appropriate equipment. (II-2B)

  • 17.

    Evidence for the benefit of recombinant activated factor VII has been gathered from very few cases of massive PPH. Therefore this agent cannot be recommended as part of routine practice. (II-3 L)

  • 18.

    Uterine tamponade can be an efficient and effective intervention to temporarily control active PPH due to uterine atony that has not responded to medical therapy. (III-L)

  • 19.

    Surgical techniques such as ligation of the internal iliac artery, compression sutures, and hysterectomy should be used for the management of intractable PPH unresponsive to medical therapy. (III-B)

Recommendations were quantified using the evaluation of evidence guidelines developed by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table 1).

REFERENCES (55)

  • S.D. Joy et al.

    Misoprostol use during the third stage of labor

    Int J Gynaecol Obstet

    (2003)
  • A.M. Gülmezoglu et al.

    WHO multicentre randomised trial of misoprostol in the management of the third stage of labour

    Lancet

    (2001)
  • S.M. Parsons et al.

    Rectal misoprostol versus oxytocin in the management of the third stage of labour

    J Obstet Gynaecol Can

    (2007)
  • A.C. Yao et al.

    Distribution of blood between infant and placenta after birth

    Lancet

    (1969)
  • M.P. Dombrowski et al.

    Third stage of labor: analysis of duration and clinical practice

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (1995)
  • T.F. Baskett

    Surgical management of severe obstetrical hemorrhage: experience with an obstetrical hemorrhage equipment tray

    J Obstet Gynaecol Can

    (2004)
  • S. Vedantham et al.

    Uterine artery embolization: an underused method of controlling pelvic hemorrhage

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (1997)
  • J.H. Cho et al.

    Hemostatic suturing technique for uterine bleeding during cesarean delivery

    Obstet Gynecol

    (2000)
  • C. AbouZahr

    Global burden of maternal death and disability

    Br Med Bull

    (2003)
  • F.C. Reynders et al.

    Postpartum hemorrhage: practical approach to a life-threatening complication

    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol

    (2006)
  • D. Subtil et al.

    Postpartum hemorrhage: frequency, consequences in terms of health status, and risk factors before delivery

    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)

    (2004)
  • T.T. Kane et al.

    Maternal mortality in Giza, Egypt: magnitude, causes, and prevention

    Stud Fam Plann

    (1992)
  • R.V. Maier

    Approach to the patient with shock

  • P. Bose et al.

    Improving the accuracy of estimated blood loss at obstetric haemorrhage using clinical reconstructions

    BJOG

    (2006)
  • W.J. Prendiville et al.

    Active versus expectant management in the third stage of labour

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2000)
  • International Confederation of Midwives et al.

    Joint statement: management of the third stage of labour to prevent post-partum haemorrhage

    J Midwifery Womens Health

    (2004)
  • World Health Organization

    Recommendations for the Prevention of Postpartum Haemorrhage

    (2007)
  • Cited by (221)

    • Dose-dependent increase in risk of bleeding and bleeding complications in relation to SSRI use at delivery

      2024, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This Clinical Practice Guideline has been prepared by the Clinical Practice Obstetrics Committee and approved by the Executive and Council of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.

    Disclosure statements have been received from all members of the committee.

    This document reflects emerging clinical and scientific advances on the date issued and is subject to change. The information should not be construed as dictating an exclusive course of treatment or procedure to be followed. Local institutions can dictate amendments to these opinions. They should be well documented if modified at the local level. None of these contents may be reproduced in any form without prior written permission of the SOGC.

    View full text