Research in context
Evidence before this study
We searched PubMed for studies
Exposure to foreign red-blood-cell antigens can induce alloimmunisation. Notwithstanding current ABO/RhD-matching and stringent antibody screening policies, life-threatening haemolytic reactions resulting from boosting of previously induced alloantibodies still complicate red-blood-cell transfusions.1, 2 Moreover, previous alloimmunisations demand extensive laboratory efforts and can result in delays in finding compatible donor blood.
A complete antigenic phenotype match between donor and recipient would theoretically eliminate all transfusion-induced alloimmunisations, but achieving this entails countless logistical and financial challenges. The next best alternative is to select donor units matched at least on the most immunogenic antigens for patients at high risk. In line with this principle, patients with myelodysplastic syndrome, and autoimmunised or alloimmunised patients in the Netherlands are advised to receive blood matched on the CcEe and K antigens, whereas patients with haemoglobinopathy additionally receive blood matched on Fya and preferentially Jkb and Ss antigens as well.3 Since alloimmunisation can severely complicate subsequent pregnancies, women under 45 years of age receive blood matched on c, E, and K antigens.3 These matching strategies are based on broad expert consensus on the antigens' immunogenicity—ie, their intrinsic potency to stimulate humoral immune responses. RhD is without doubt the most immunogenic antigen and is followed by K.1 However, data for the relative immunogenicity of several other antigens are conflicting,4, 5, 6, 7 requiring additional observational evidence.
We set out to quantify antigen-specific alloimmunisation incidences in relation to the cumulative number of mismatched transfusions per patient as a measure of the intrinsic immunogenicity of red-cell antigens. This knowledge will enable an evidence-based optimisation of matching strategies, balancing benefits against costs and logistic aspects.
We performed an incident new-user cohort study in patients consecutively transfused in three university hospitals and three non-university hospitals in the Netherlands. We included all previously non-transfused and non-alloimmunised patients who received at least one red-blood-cell transfusion during the study period, provided the availability of at least one pre-transfusion and post-transfusion antibody screen.
Research in context Evidence before this study We searched PubMed for studies
The study period varied per hospital according to the electronic availability of necessary data: from Jan 1, 2005, to Dec 31, 2010, at Leiden University Medical Center (Leiden); from Sept 6, 2006, to Dec 31, 2013, at University Medical Center Utrecht (Utrecht); from Nov 19, 2011, to Dec 31, 2013, at VU University Medical Center (Amsterdam); from May 1, 2007, to April 30, 2013, at Catharina Hospital (Eindhoven); from July 1, 2005, to Dec 31, 2013, at Jeroen Bosch Hospital (‘s-Hertogenbosch); and
In this study involving 21 512 newly transfused patients, we established estimates of dose-specific red-cell alloimmunisation risks. In agreement with previous reports, K is most potent in stimulating humoral alloimmune responses. E demonstrates the second highest immunogenicity, followed by Cw, e, Jka, and c.
The alloimmunisation rate we observed here of 0·9% after one K-positive unit is five times lower than historically assumed.4 Moreover, since previous studies did not take into account the
These authors contributed equally to this work