Articles
Safety of multicomponent meningococcal group B vaccine (4CMenB) in routine infant immunisation in the UK: a prospective surveillance study

https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30103-2Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Safety data for the multicomponent meningococcal group B vaccine (4CMenB) has so far been limited to experience from clinical trials and isolated local outbreaks. Since the UK is the first country to implement a nationwide routine immunisation programme with 4CMenB (at age 8 weeks, 16 weeks, and then 1 year), we aimed to assess the safety of 4CMenB in this setting.

Methods

In this prospective surveillance study, we assessed suspected adverse reactions of 4CMenB in children up to age 18 months reported in the UK Yellow Card Scheme and primary care records extracted from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). We proactively assessed reports of fever, local reactions, Kawasaki disease, seizures, and sudden death, and compared the number of spontaneous reports with the expected number of events based on background incidence and the number of children vaccinated. We also identified any unexpected adverse reactions and estimated compliance with subsequent doses of routine vaccinations.

Findings

From Sept 1, 2015, to May 31, 2017, approximately 1·29 million children aged 2–18 months received about a combined 3 million doses of 4CMenB. 902 reports of suspected adverse reactions were received through the UK Yellow Card Scheme, of which 366 (41%) were related to local reactions and 364 (40%) related to fever. The only unexpected finding was that 160 reports of local reactions described a persistent nodule at the site of injection, usually without other local symptoms. There were 55 (6%) reports of seizures, with an age-adjusted observed-to-expected ratio of 0·13 (95% CI 0·10–0·17). Ecological analyses found similar rates of seizures within 7 days of routine immunisation in the periods before and after 4CMenB introduction, with incidence rate ratios of 1·30 (95% CI 0·56–3·00) at age 2 months, 1·53 (0·49–4·74) at age 4 months, and 1·26 (0·69–2·32) at age 12 months. Of the 902 reports, three (<1%) were of Kawasaki disease (observed-to-expected ratio 1·40, 95% CI 0·29–4·08) and three (<1%) of sudden infant death syndrome within 3 days of vaccination in children aged 2–4 months (0·44, 0·12–1·14). Analysis of routine immunisations recorded in CPRD found that 11 602 (95·1%) of 12 199 children had received the second dose of 4CMenB by 26 weeks of age, 1793 (84·7%) of 2117 had received the third dose by 62 weeks of age, and 4CMenB introduction had not reduced compliance with doses of other routine vaccinations.

Interpretation

We found no significant safety concerns after widespread use of 4CMenB in UK infants, and the vaccine appears to have been well accepted by parents. However, it is important to continue monitoring the safety and long-term effect of the immunisation programme in the UK to further characterise the reported suspected adverse reactions.

Funding

None.

Introduction

In September, 2015, the UK became the first country to implement a nationwide routine infant immunisation programme with a multi-component, broad-spectrum meningococcal group B vaccine (4CMenB; Bexsero, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Belgium).1 Before this programme, the use of 4CMenB was limited mainly to clinical trials and in localised disease outbreaks. As advised by the UK Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation,2 the vaccine is recommended for all infants alongside their routine immunisations at age 8 weeks (diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis, inactivated polio, and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine [DTaP/IPV/Hib]; 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine [PCV13]; and the oral rotavirus vaccine) and age 16 weeks (DTaP/IPV/Hib and PCV13), followed by a booster on their first birthday, given concomitantly with an H influenzae type b and meningococcal C combination vaccine; the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine; and PCV13. Children attending for their routine vaccinations at 12 weeks of age were also eligible for 4CMenB vaccination as a limited catch-up at the beginning of the immunisation programme. There was no catch-up campaign for older cohorts. Because of high reported numbers of fever and other vaccine-associated reactions when 4CMenB is coadministered with the other routine immunisations in those aged 1 year,3, 4 three doses of prophylactic paracetamol are recommended to be given with the 8-week and 16-week immunisations; the first dose of paracetamol should be administered around the time of vaccination with two additional doses at 4–6 h intervals.5, 6

Research in context

Evidence before this study

We considered published reports of pre-licensure pivotal clinical trials and post-licensure use in Canada of the multicomponent meningococcal group B vaccine (4CMenB). In these reports, 4CMenB was associated with high rates of local reactions and fever when given at the same time as other routine infant vaccines. However, very rare adverse reactions and the potential effect of the increased reactogenicity can only be identified and characterised during use in large population cohorts.

Added value of this study

Following widespread use of 4CMenB in UK infants, the safety profile appears consistent with that seen in clinical trials, with local reactions and fever being the most commonly reported adverse reactions. Additionally, our study showed no significant new safety concerns arising and high compliance with the second and third 4CMenB doses, and the addition of 4CMenB to the routine infant immunisation schedule did not seem to have had an adverse effect on compliance with other vaccinations.

Implications of all the available evidence

Alongside the emerging data for vaccine effectiveness, the experience so far from the UK routine immunisation programme shows that 4CMenB has a favourable benefit–risk profile. It is important that safety remains under continual review to further characterise the reported suspected adverse reactions.

Early data suggested that laboratory-confirmed cases of invasive meningococcal group B infection halved in vaccine-eligible infants during the first 10 months of the immunisation programme, with an estimated effectiveness of 94% against vaccine-preventable strains.7 The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has statutory responsibility for the safety of vaccines and medicines in the UK, and the UK National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) is a batch release authority for 4CMenB. In this study, we aimed to present the outcome of an MHRA and NIBSC proactive pharmacovigilance strategy for 4CMenB since its introduction in the UK's routine infant immunisation programme.

Section snippets

Data sources

We assessed suspected adverse reactions of 4CMenB using data from the UK Yellow Card Scheme. Introduced in 1964, the Yellow Card Scheme is a passive safety surveillance system through which health-care professionals and members of the public can report a spontaneous suspected adverse reaction to any vaccine or medicinal product directly to the MHRA. Yellow Cards can be submitted by post, online, or via a smartphone application. Pharmaceutical companies are also legally obliged to report serious

Results

From Sept 1, 2015, to May 31, 2017, an estimated 1·29 million first doses, 1·17 million second doses, and 585 000 third doses were administered to approximately 1·29 million infants in the UK as part of the national immunisation schedule. During this 20-month surveillance period, the MHRA received 902 Yellow Card reports, of which 467 (52%) were coded as serious, for 4CMenB in children younger than 18 months across the UK (including all reports with unspecified age), equivalent to a passive

Discussion

After more than 3 million doses given to about 1·29 million infants over 20 months across the UK, our analysis is the most comprehensive assessment of 4CMenB safety to date. The safety profile of 4CMenB has been broadly as expected, with no serious safety concerns identified so far, and the anticipated reactogenicity has not adversely affected compliance with subsequent vaccine doses. Alongside the data for vaccine effectiveness, the experience so far from the UK routine immunisation programme

References (34)

  • S Braccio et al.

    Question 1: does prophylactic paracetamol prevent fever after vaccination in infants?

    Arch Dis Child

    (2015)
  • R Prymula et al.

    A phase 2 randomized controlled trial of a multicomponent meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (I)

    Hum Vaccin Immunother

    (2014)
  • E Herrett et al.

    Data resource profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)

    Int J Epidemiol

    (2015)
  • K Donegan et al.

    Safety of pertussis vaccine in pregnant women in UK: observational study

    BMJ

    (2014)
  • Statistical bulletin: unexplained deaths in infancy, England and Wales

  • A Harnden et al.

    Rising incidence of Kawasaki disease in England: analysis of hospital admission data

    BMJ

    (2002)
  • Statistical bulletin: unexplained deaths in infancy, England and Wales

  • Cited by (55)

    • Recent advances in meningococcal B disease prevention: real-world evidence from 4CMenB vaccination

      2021, Journal of Infection
      Citation Excerpt :

      They include the administration of more than 3 million 4CMenB doses in infants in the UK;64,65 administration to approximately 30,500 adolescents in South Australia;66 passive surveillance in Australia after market introduction;67 surveillance during implementation in university outbreaks the US;68 and post-marketing surveillance in Italy60 and Germany.69 Post-marketing surveillance in the UK found no evidence of an increased risk of seizures, febrile seizures or Kawasaki disease after 4CMenB vaccination.64,65 No immune-mediated or neurological safety signals were identified in post-marketing surveillance in Germany.69

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text