Articles
Nab-paclitaxel plus either gemcitabine or simplified leucovorin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (AFUGEM GERCOR): a non-comparative, multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2 trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30046-8Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine has become a standard treatment regimen in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma; however, retrospective data suggest that gemcitabine might be inefficient in 50–60% of patients and thus not an optimum regimen in combination with nab-paclitaxel. We did a phase 2 trial to assess the activity and safety of a new regimen of nab-paclitaxel plus simplified leucovorin and fluorouracil.

Methods

We did a non-comparative, multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2 trial in 15 hospitals and institutions in France. Eligible participants were previously untreated patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (previous adjuvant chemotherapy after curative intent resection was allowed if the interval between the end of chemotherapy and relapse was more than 12 months). Patients had to have at least one measurable lesion assessed by CT scan or MRI and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or less. We randomly assigned participants (1:2) centrally to 28-day cycles of either gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel or simplified leucovorin and fluorouracil plus nab-paclitaxel. The randomisation was by minimisation, stratified by centre and ECOG performance status. Drugs were administered in each cycle as follows: nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) as 30-min intravenous infusions on days 1, 8, and 15; leucovorin (400 mg/m2) as a 120-min intravenous infusion on days 1 and 15; and fluorouracil (400 mg/m2) as a 5-min bolus intravenous infusion followed by a 46-h continuous intravenous infusion of 2400 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15. Patients continued treatment until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or patient withdrawal. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 4 months in the first 72 assessable patients in the leucovorin and fluorouracil group, with a target of 50% for the regimen to be deemed sufficiently active to warrant further study. We did the primary analysis on the modified intention-to-treat (ITT) population, defined as all randomly assigned and assessable patients regardless of their eligibility and received treatments. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01964534. The trial has ended and we report the final analysis here.

Findings

Between Dec 12, 2013, and Oct 31, 2014, we randomly assigned 114 patients to treatment: 75 patients to the leucovorin and fluorouracil group and 39 to the gemcitabine group. One patient in the leucovorin and fluorouracil group did not have a 4-month assessment, and was thus excluded from the modified ITT analysis. Median follow-up was 13·1 months (95% CI 12·5–14·1). At 4 months, 40 (56%, 90% CI 45–66) of 72 patients in the leucovorin and fluorouracil group were alive and free from disease progression (21 [54%, 40–68] of 39 patients in the gemcitabine group were also alive and progression-free at 4 months). Grade 3–4 adverse events occurred in 33 (87%) of 38 patients in the gemcitabine group and in 56 (77%) of 73 patients in the leucovorin and fluorouracil group, with different toxicity profiles. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events in the leucovorin and fluorouracil group were neutropenia without fever (17 [23%]), fatigue (16 [22%]), paraesthesia (14 [19%]), diarrhoea (nine [12%]), and mucositis (seven [10%]); in the gemcitabine group they were neutropenia without fever (12 [32%]), thrombocytopenia (seven [18%]), fatigue (eight [21%]), anaemia (five [13%]), increased alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase concentrations (five [13%] for both), and paraesthesia (four [11%]). Two participants died; one in the leucovorin and fluorouracil group from septic shock, and one in the gemcitabine group from diabetes compensation with acidosis; these deaths were deemed to be not related to treatment. Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 28 (38%) of 73 patients in the leucovorin and fluorouracil group and in 14 (37%) of 38 in the gemcitabine group.

Interpretation

Nab-paclitaxel plus simplified leucovorin and fluorouracil fulfilled the primary endpoint in that more than the required 50% of our study population were progression-free at 4 months, with a tolerable toxicity profile. This regimen thus deserves further assessment in a phase 3 trial.

Funding

GERCOR (Groupe Coopérateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie) and Celgene through grants to GERCOR.

Introduction

The incidence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is increasing in high-income countries and it is expected to become the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in 2020.1, 2 The prognosis of this disease remains very poor with prevalence and incidence roughly equivalent; 5-year overall survival for patients diagnosed with the disease is less than 5%.3

Gemcitabine monotherapy was the standard treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma for many years.4 Over the past decade, the results of several randomised phase 3 studies assessing combinations of cytotoxic agents or cytotoxic agents with targeted chemotherapy did not suggest these were superior compared with gemcitabine alone. The results from one phase 3 trial showed that gemcitabine plus erlotinib was associated with a significant but not clinically relevant benefit in overall survival.5 In 2011, the FOLFIRINOX regimen (fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin), and more recently the combination of nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine, have been shown to be more effective than gemcitabine monotherapy in terms of the proportion of patients with an objective response, progression-free survival, and overall survival.6, 7 These regimens are now accepted as the standard first-line treatment options for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, but no published randomised trials have directly compared them. Moreover, a head-to-head comparison of trials assessing these two regimens is difficult, given differences in patient profiles and rates of second-line chemotherapy across participating countries.6, 7

Gemcitabine is a hydrophilic prodrug that requires the presence of specialised integral membrane nucleoside transporter proteins to efficiently permeate into tumour cells.8 Among these, the major mediator of gemcitabine uptake into human cells is the hENT1 protein. Intracellular gemcitabine must then be phosphorylated to its active diphosphate and triphosphate metabolites by subsequent kinases.9, 10 The first phosphorylation is achieved by deoxycytidine kinase in a rate-limiting step of its cellular anabolism. Findings from many retrospective studies in the adjuvant setting have suggested that the level of expression of hENT1 protein and deoxycytidine kinase could be predictive of gemcitabine's efficacy.11, 12, 13, 14 Moreover, these retrospective data suggested that gemcitabine might be inefficient in 50–60% of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and thus not an optimum regimen for combination with nab-paclitaxel.11, 12, 13, 15

Fluorouracil as monotherapy or in combination with gemcitabine has shown some activity in the adjuvant setting of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and has become a key component of first-line and second-line regimens in metastatic disease.6, 16, 17, 18, 19 Nab-paclitaxel can be associated with a fluoropyrimidine with a tolerable toxicity profile.20, 21 The simplified leucovorin and fluorouracil regimen first developed by de Gramont and colleagues has shown a better toxicity profile than fluorouracil bolus.22 In comparison with capecitabine, the combination of leucovorin plus fluorouracil is associated with fewer occurrences of grade 3–4 diarrhoea and hand–foot syndrome, but more grade 3–4 neutropenia, which could however be controlled with the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) when necessary.23, 24

The aim of the AFUGEM GERCOR (Groupe Coopérateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie) randomised non-comparative phase 2 trial was to assess the tolerability and activity of a nab-paclitaxel plus simplified leucovorin and fluorouracil combination regimen in patients with untreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Section snippets

Study design and participants

We did a non-comparative, multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial in 15 institutions and hospitals in France (appendix). The study protocol was approved by the French ethics committee Ile de France VI. The detailed protocol is published.25

Eligible patients for this study were required to be aged 18 years or older with pathologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma previously untreated for metastases. We allowed previous adjuvant chemotherapy after curative intent resection if the

Results

Between Dec 12, 2013, and Oct 31, 2014, we randomly assigned 114 patients to treatment; 75 to the simplified leucovorin and fluorouracil group and 39 to the gemcitabine group (figure 1, table 1). Included in the modified ITT analysis were 74 of 75 participants in the leucovorin and fluorouracil group (one assigned patient in this group did not have an assessment at month 4) and all 39 in the gemcitabine group. Treatment groups were well balanced with regard to age, ECOG performance status,

Discussion

More than 50% of patients who received the regimen of nab-paclitaxel plus simplified leucovorin and fluorouracil were progression-free at 4 months. Other measures of activity in the leucovorin and fluorouracil group were similar to or seemingly better than those in the gemcitabine group, and the new regimen was tolerable to patients. This regimen thus deserves further assessment in a phase 3 trial and might serve as a potential backbone for new combinations.

The results with nab-paclitaxel plus

References (30)

  • MJ Moore et al.

    Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group

    J Clin Oncol

    (2007)
  • T Conroy et al.

    FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2011)
  • DD Von Hoff et al.

    Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine

    N Engl J Med

    (2013)
  • P Huang et al.

    Induction of apoptosis by gemcitabine

    Semin Oncol

    (1995)
  • R Marechal et al.

    Levels of gemcitabine transport and metabolism proteins predict survival times of patients treated with gemcitabine for pancreatic adenocarcinoma

    Gastroenterology

    (2012)
  • Cited by (28)

    • %TTD and %TUDD: New SAS macro programs to calculate the survival data of the time to deterioration for patient-reported outcomes data in oncology

      2022, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      In this section we illustrate an application of each macro to calculate the time to deterioration for PROs data from the randomized phase II AFUGEM GERCOR clinical trial [16]. The detail of the study design, the administration and the compliance of the QLQ-C30 have previously been reported [17,18]. Five targeted dimensions were a priori defined in the protocol, namely: physical functioning (PF), emotional functioning (EF), fatigue (FA), pain (PA), and appetite loss (AP).

    • IDO1/TDO dual inhibitor RY103 targets Kyn-AhR pathway and exhibits preclinical efficacy on pancreatic cancer

      2021, Cancer Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      Pancreatic cancer (PC) is an aggressive human malignancy with an overall 5-year survival rate of about 5% [1]. Gemcitabine alone or in combination with nab-paclitaxel is the standard treatment for advanced PC but provides only modest clinical benefit [2]. The presence of a large number of immunosuppressive cells such as regulatory T cells (Tregs), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in the microenvironment of PC is conducive for PC cells to evade immune surveillance, thereby facilitating the proliferation, invasion, and metastasis of PC cells [3].

    • Prognostic value of the early change in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

      2021, Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology
      Citation Excerpt :

      These included the following: age, ECOG PS, and doses of albumin at diagnosis, tumor location, tumor differentiation grade, prior history of surgery, number and location of metastatic sites, number of platelets, CEA, CA 19-9 within 15 days prior chemotherapy initiation, chemotherapy data (type of regimen, date of the first and the last cycle, reasons for treatment interruption), the date of the last assessment and the date of death. For the AFUGEM cohort, clinical, pathological, and biological data were prospectively collected as previously described [25]. In the both cohorts, white blood cell count including neutrophil and lymphocyte counts in units of 1/mm3 were collected every 15 days during the first 2 months of treatment (on days 1, 15, 30, 45, and 60) and on days 120 and 180, or at progression if it occurred before day 180.

    • A transcriptomic signature to predict adjuvant gemcitabine sensitivity in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

      2021, Annals of Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      For instance, in an adjuvant setting, it was shown that bolus fluorouracil plus folinic acid had similar efficacy to gemcitabine, and one could suggest that it is also true in advanced patients unfit for aggressive combinations.42 Similarly, nab-paclitaxel in metastatic patients was shown to be as effective with either 5-fluoruracil or gemcitabine.43 The availability of a potent predictor of gemcitabine efficacy would allow selecting the most relevant regimen.

    • Chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer

      2019, Presse Medicale
      Citation Excerpt :

      Other grade 3/4 adverse effects that were more common in patients in the combination group were fatigue (17% vs. 7%) and peripheral neuropathy (17% vs. 1%). Nab-paclitaxel can also be safely combined with either infusional 5-FU/leucovorin [20] or capecitabine [21], e.g. in patients with disease relapse following resection and adjuvant gemcitabine chemotherapy or with gemcitabine intolerance, although there are no data from randomized trials on efficacy. In a phase I trial of 35 patients (24 with metastatic and 11 with locally advanced disease), a combination of nab-paclitaxel with 5-FU, leucovorin and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) has also been reported.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text