Metabolomic profiling of human urine in hepatocellular carcinoma patients using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most prevalent malignant tumour worldwide and ranks the third as a cancer killer, causing more than half a million deaths annually in the world [1], [2]. The prognosis of HCC largely depends on the stage of the tumor. Early diagnosis can be obtained with surveillance of patients at risk using diagnostic modalities such as ultrasound (US) [3]. The commonly used serology tests for screening such as alphafetoprotein (AFP) are no longer considered as powerful screening tools in patients with chronic liver disease due to high false positive and false negative rates [4], [5]. The ideal biomarker should be the one that can be detected with good sensitivity and specificity in biological samples from the patient in a minimally invasive manner (e.g., blood, saliva, or urine). Recently, metabolomic profiling approaches have been increasingly used to elucidate significant changes in tumor metabolism and to explore candidate “biomarkers” from such variance within a huge number of endogenous metabolites.
Blood and urine are the most frequently used samples for exploring the systematic alteration in human metabolome. Compared with blood sample, utilization of urine samples is preferred as it enables non-invasive monitoring of metabolomic changes.
Metabolomics, defined as the quantitative measurement of all low-molecular-weight metabolites in an organism at a specified time under specific environmental conditions [6], has been shown to be an effective tool for disease diagnosis [7], [8], biomarker screening [9], [10], and characterization of biological pathways [11]. Metabolomic studies generally employ such techniques as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS, and LC/MS/MS), Fourier transform infrared (FT/IR) spectroscopy, and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) [12]. Among them, GC/MS has been described as a sensitive and reproducible method, which have been proposed as an ideal tool for metabolomic profiling of urine samples[13]. Metabolic profiling of urine has been successfully performed by GC/MS using bis-(trimethylsilyl)–trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA) as the derivatization agent [13], [14].
The aims of this study were to compare metabolite profiling from urine samples between HCC patients and healthy subjects using GC/MS and chemical derivatization and to establish a diagnotic model from these metabolic biomarkers to distinguish HCC from the normal subjects, using principal components analysis (PCA).
Section snippets
Chemicals and reagents
l-2-chlorophenylalanine as internal standard was purchased from Shanghai Intechem Tech. Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Methanol (pesticide residue grade), bis-(trimethylsilyl)–trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA) plus 1% trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS) and amino acid standard solution were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St Louis, MO,USA). All other chemicals and reagents were purchased from Ampu Company (Shanghai, China). Distilled water was produced by the Milli-Q ReagentWater System (Millipore, MA, USA).
Patient recruitment and sample collection
Comparison of serum ALT levels and AFP between study and control groups
The mean ALT level of the control group was 33.5 ± 19.6 U L−1, which was a little lower than 69.0 ± 39.6 U L−1 of the HCC group (p < 0.01, analysis of variance (ANOVA)). They were both within normal range, which was set between 0 to 75 U L−1[16]. An elevated level of serum ALT in the HCC group represented an alteration in liver function. We expected that serum metabolome could be influenced by the altered liver function [22]. We then hypothesized that urinary metabolome could also be affected, which might
Conclusions
This work is an integrated analysis based on metabolomic profiling of human urine by chemical derivatization and GC/MS in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. The multivariate analysis of metabolomic data combining 18 marker metabolites with alphafetoprotein established an optimized diagnostic model to discriminate between the hepatocellular carcinoma patients and healthy subjects with an area under the curve value on receiver–operator characteristic of 0.9275, which was different from
Acknowledgements
This study was financially supported by National Basic Research Program of China (2007CB936000), Ministry of Health (2009ZX10004-301), China National Key Projects for Infectious Diseases (2008ZX10002-017) and National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 30772505& No. 30872503).
References (43)
- et al.
Gastroenterology
(2004) - et al.
J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci.
(2007) - et al.
J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci.
(2004) - et al.
Anal. Chim. Acta
(2008) - et al.
Diabetes Metab.
(2004) - et al.
Anal. Biochem.
(2003) - et al.
J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.
(1995) - et al.
Anal. Chim. Acta
(2003) Clin. Liver Dis.
(2001)- et al.
Gastroenterology
(1994)
Gastroenterology
Anal. Biochem.
Biochem. Pharmacol.
CA Cancer. J. Clin.
Gut
Ann. Intern. Med.
Am. J. Gastroenterol.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.
J. Clin. Oncol.
Clin. Chem.
Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.
Cited by (151)
Cancer biomarkers and their biosensors: A comprehensive review
2023, TrAC - Trends in Analytical ChemistryVisualization of statistically processed LC-MS-based metabolomics data for identifying significant features in a multiple-group comparison
2021, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory SystemsCitation Excerpt :Another difference is that the S plot is not an orthogonal plot, and it is difficult to directly observe changes in the trend. Besides, most metabolomics studies are focused on a comparison of averages between two groups, for example, low and high concentrations of xenobiotic exposure for healthy subjects and patients on high-dimensional data [11–16]. However, these plots can only reveal the significant metabolite features for two groups (or two metabolite statuses), and no well-known visualization plot can be demonstrated for multiple groups.
Gas chromatographic applications in metabolomics
2021, Gas ChromatographyMetabolomic biomarkers in urine of rats following long-term low-dose exposure of cadmium and/or chlorpyrifos
2020, Ecotoxicology and Environmental SafetyHuman Urinary Metabolomics as Biomarkers in Tobacco Users: A Systematic Review
2024, Contemporary Clinical Dentistry