Elsevier

Analytica Chimica Acta

Volume 648, Issue 1, 19 August 2009, Pages 98-104
Analytica Chimica Acta

Metabolomic profiling of human urine in hepatocellular carcinoma patients using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2009.06.033Get rights and content

Abstract

With the technique of metabolomics, gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), urine or serum metabolites can be assayed to explore disease biomarkers. In this work, we present a metabolomic method to investigate the urinary metabolic difference between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, n = 20) male patients and normal male subjects (n = 20). The urinary endogenous metabolome was assayed using chemical derivatization followed by GC/MS. After GC/MS analysis, 103 metabolites were detected, of which 66 were annotated as known compounds. By a two sample t-test statistics with p < 0.05, 18 metabolites were shown to be significantly different between the HCC and control groups. A diagnostic model was constructed with a combination of 18 marker metabolites or together with alphafetoprotein, using principal component analysis and receiver–operator characteristic curves. The multivariate statistics of the diagnostic model yielded a separation between the two groups with an area under the curve value of 0.9275. This non-invasive technique of identifying HCC biomarkers from urine may have clinical utility.

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most prevalent malignant tumour worldwide and ranks the third as a cancer killer, causing more than half a million deaths annually in the world [1], [2]. The prognosis of HCC largely depends on the stage of the tumor. Early diagnosis can be obtained with surveillance of patients at risk using diagnostic modalities such as ultrasound (US) [3]. The commonly used serology tests for screening such as alphafetoprotein (AFP) are no longer considered as powerful screening tools in patients with chronic liver disease due to high false positive and false negative rates [4], [5]. The ideal biomarker should be the one that can be detected with good sensitivity and specificity in biological samples from the patient in a minimally invasive manner (e.g., blood, saliva, or urine). Recently, metabolomic profiling approaches have been increasingly used to elucidate significant changes in tumor metabolism and to explore candidate “biomarkers” from such variance within a huge number of endogenous metabolites.

Blood and urine are the most frequently used samples for exploring the systematic alteration in human metabolome. Compared with blood sample, utilization of urine samples is preferred as it enables non-invasive monitoring of metabolomic changes.

Metabolomics, defined as the quantitative measurement of all low-molecular-weight metabolites in an organism at a specified time under specific environmental conditions [6], has been shown to be an effective tool for disease diagnosis [7], [8], biomarker screening [9], [10], and characterization of biological pathways [11]. Metabolomic studies generally employ such techniques as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS, and LC/MS/MS), Fourier transform infrared (FT/IR) spectroscopy, and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) [12]. Among them, GC/MS has been described as a sensitive and reproducible method, which have been proposed as an ideal tool for metabolomic profiling of urine samples[13]. Metabolic profiling of urine has been successfully performed by GC/MS using bis-(trimethylsilyl)–trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA) as the derivatization agent [13], [14].

The aims of this study were to compare metabolite profiling from urine samples between HCC patients and healthy subjects using GC/MS and chemical derivatization and to establish a diagnotic model from these metabolic biomarkers to distinguish HCC from the normal subjects, using principal components analysis (PCA).

Section snippets

Chemicals and reagents

l-2-chlorophenylalanine as internal standard was purchased from Shanghai Intechem Tech. Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Methanol (pesticide residue grade), bis-(trimethylsilyl)–trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA) plus 1% trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS) and amino acid standard solution were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St Louis, MO,USA). All other chemicals and reagents were purchased from Ampu Company (Shanghai, China). Distilled water was produced by the Milli-Q ReagentWater System (Millipore, MA, USA).

Patient recruitment and sample collection

Comparison of serum ALT levels and AFP between study and control groups

The mean ALT level of the control group was 33.5 ± 19.6 U L−1, which was a little lower than 69.0 ± 39.6 U L−1 of the HCC group (p < 0.01, analysis of variance (ANOVA)). They were both within normal range, which was set between 0 to 75 U L−1[16]. An elevated level of serum ALT in the HCC group represented an alteration in liver function. We expected that serum metabolome could be influenced by the altered liver function [22]. We then hypothesized that urinary metabolome could also be affected, which might

Conclusions

This work is an integrated analysis based on metabolomic profiling of human urine by chemical derivatization and GC/MS in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. The multivariate analysis of metabolomic data combining 18 marker metabolites with alphafetoprotein established an optimized diagnostic model to discriminate between the hepatocellular carcinoma patients and healthy subjects with an area under the curve value on receiver–operator characteristic of 0.9275, which was different from

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by National Basic Research Program of China (2007CB936000), Ministry of Health (2009ZX10004-301), China National Key Projects for Infectious Diseases (2008ZX10002-017) and National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 30772505& No. 30872503).

References (43)

  • F.X. Bosch et al.

    Gastroenterology

    (2004)
  • Q. Zhang et al.

    J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci.

    (2007)
  • J. Yang et al.

    J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci.

    (2004)
  • S. Strano-Rossi et al.

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (2008)
  • C. Postic et al.

    Diabetes Metab.

    (2004)
  • S.G. Villas-Boas et al.

    Anal. Biochem.

    (2003)
  • M.L. Anthony et al.

    J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.

    (1995)
  • O. Beckonert et al.

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (2003)
  • P.J. Johnson

    Clin. Liver Dis.

    (2001)
  • J.C. Nichols et al.

    Gastroenterology

    (1994)
  • Y. Iimuro et al.

    Gastroenterology

    (1996)
  • H. Wu et al.

    Anal. Biochem.

    (2005)
  • N.J. Waters et al.

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (2002)
  • D.M. Parkin et al.

    CA Cancer. J. Clin.

    (2005)
  • J. Bruix et al.

    Gut

    (2001)
  • S. Gupta et al.

    Ann. Intern. Med.

    (2003)
  • A. Colli et al.

    Am. J. Gastroenterol.

    (2006)
  • A.A. Evans et al.

    Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.

    (2002)
  • W.M. Claudino et al.

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2007)
  • W.R. Wikoff et al.

    Clin. Chem.

    (2007)
  • R. Xue et al.

    Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.

    (2008)
  • Cited by (151)

    • Cancer biomarkers and their biosensors: A comprehensive review

      2023, TrAC - Trends in Analytical Chemistry
    • Visualization of statistically processed LC-MS-based metabolomics data for identifying significant features in a multiple-group comparison

      2021, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems
      Citation Excerpt :

      Another difference is that the S plot is not an orthogonal plot, and it is difficult to directly observe changes in the trend. Besides, most metabolomics studies are focused on a comparison of averages between two groups, for example, low and high concentrations of xenobiotic exposure for healthy subjects and patients on high-dimensional data [11–16]. However, these plots can only reveal the significant metabolite features for two groups (or two metabolite statuses), and no well-known visualization plot can be demonstrated for multiple groups.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text