Elsevier

Acta Tropica

Volume 174, October 2017, Pages 91-96
Acta Tropica

Invited Review
Current vector control challenges in the fight against malaria

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.06.028Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The effective control of Anopheles vectors plays a key role in any malaria management program.

  • Most National Malaria Control Programs in Africa still rely to IRS and LLINs.

  • IRS and LLINs reduce malaria incidence but have little impact on malaria prevalence.

  • Outdoor transmission and insecticide resistance threaten the efficacy of LLINs and IRS.

  • This review discussed challenges and trends in malaria vector control research.

Abstract

The effective and eco-friendly control of Anopheles vectors plays a key role in any malaria management program. Integrated Vector Management (IVM) suggests making use of the full range of vector control tools available. The strategies for IVM require novel technologies to control outdoor transmission of malaria. Despite the wide number of promising control tools tested against mosquitoes, current strategies for malaria vector control used in most African countries are not sufficient to achieve successful malaria control. The majority of National Malaria Control Programs in Africa still rely on indoor residual spraying (IRS) and long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs). These methods reduce malaria incidence but generally have little impact on malaria prevalence. In addition to outdoor transmission, growing levels of insecticide resistance in targeted vectors threaten the efficacy of LLINs and IRS. Larvicidal treatments can be useful, but are not recommended for rural areas. The research needed to improve the quality and delivery of mosquito vector control should focus on (i) optimization of processes and methods for vector control delivery; (ii) monitoring of vector populations and biting activity with reliable techniques; (iii) the development of effective and eco-friendly tools to reduce the burden or locally eliminate malaria and other mosquito-borne diseases; (iv) the careful evaluation of field suitability and efficacy of new mosquito control tools to prove their epidemiological impact; (v) the continuous monitoring of environmental changes which potentially affect malaria vector populations; (vi) the cooperation among different disciplines, with main emphasis on parasitology, tropical medicine, ecology, entomology, and ecotoxicology. A better understanding of behavioral ecology of malaria vectors is required. Key ecological obstacles that limit the effectiveness of vector control include the variation in mosquito behavior, development of insecticide resistance, presence of behavioral avoidance, high vector biodiversity, competitive and food web interactions, lack of insights on mosquito dispersal and mating behavior, and the impact of environmental changes on mosquito ecological traits. Overall, the trans-disciplinary cooperation among parasitologists and entomologists is crucial to ensure proper evaluation of the epidemiological impact triggered by novel mosquito vector control strategies.

Section snippets

What’s new in malaria management?

Malaria (from Middle Age Italian, “mala aria” which literally translates to “bad air”, since ancient populations believed that the disease was associated with swampy, marshy areas where the air smelled bad) is a disease of huge public health importance caused by Plasmodium parasites that are transmitted to humans through the bites of infected females belonging to the mosquito genus Anopheles (Diptera: Culicidae) (Capanna, 2006, Hempelmann and Krafts, 2013). The last two years registered hot

The importance of Integrated Vector Management

Following the concept of Integrated Vector Management (IVM), it is strongly suggested to avoid “vertical” management structures relying only on one form of mosquito vector control (e.g. indoor spraying), as it was common in the malaria eradication era (Nájera et al., 2011; WHO 2017b). To reduce the burden and threat of mosquito-borne diseases that affect humans, with special reference to malaria and dengue fever, WHO (2016a) supports the development of effective, locally adapted sustainable

A brief research agenda for malaria vector control

Overall, the strategies for Integrated Vector Management (IVM) (WHO, 2004, WHO, 2007, WHO, 2012, Beier et al., 2008) require novel technologies to effectively reduce outdoor transmission of malaria (The malERA Consultative Group on Vector Control, 2011). Despite the promising control tools recently tested against mosquitoes, current strategies for malaria vector control used in most African countries are not sufficient to achieve successful malaria control and local elimination (Hemingway et

Challenges and future outlooks

Overall, the development of effective and reliable mosquito vector control programs is facing several challenges, which can be classified as systemic, structural, informational, environmental, human movement, political and financial ones (WHO, 2016a). First, capacity for vector surveillance and control is insufficient in most the countries at risk from mosquito-borne diseases. Second, many countries that are endemic for more than one major mosquito-borne disease have disease-specific programs

Conflict of interest

The Author declare no competing interest.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award NumbersR01AI100968 and U19AI089702. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors, and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

References (115)

  • R. Pavela et al.

    Essential oils as eco-friendly biopesticides? Challenges and constraints

    Trends Plant Sci.

    (2016)
  • R. Pavela et al.

    Ethnobotanical knowledge on botanical repellents employed in the African region against mosquito vectors—a review

    Exp. Parasitol.

    (2016)
  • R. Pavela

    Essential oils for the development of eco-friendly mosquito larvicides: a review

    Ind. Crop Prod.

    (2015)
  • R.J. Pitts et al.

    The roles of kairomones, synomones and pheromones in the chemically-mediated behaviour of male mosquitoes

    Acta Trop.

    (2014)
  • R. Rajaganesh et al.

    Fern-synthesized silver nanocrystals: towards a new class of mosquito oviposition deterrents?

    Res. Vet. Sci.

    (2016)
  • H. Ranson et al.

    Pyrethroid resistance in African anopheline mosquitoes: what are the implications for malaria control?

    Trends Parasitol.

    (2011)
  • N.L. Achee et al.

    Spatial repellents: from discovery and development to evidence-based validation

    Malar. J.

    (2012)
  • Y.A. Afrane et al.

    Evaluation of long-lasting microbial larvicide for malaria vector control in Kenya

    Malar. J.

    (2016)
  • S.A. Allan

    Susceptibility of adult mosquitoes to insecticides in aqueous sucrose baits

    J. Vector Ecol.

    (2011)
  • S.D. Banks et al.

    Insecticide-treated clothes for the control of vector-borne diseases: a review on effectiveness and safety

    Med. Vet. Entomol.

    (2014)
  • M.N. Bayoh et al.

    Anopheles gambiae: historical population decline associated with regional distribution of insecticide-treated bed nets in western Nyanza Province, Kenya

    Malar. J.

    (2010)
  • N. Becker et al.

    Exotic mosquitoes conquer the world

  • J.C. Beier et al.

    Short report: entomologic inoculation rates and Plasmodium falciparum malaria prevalence in Africa

    Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.

    (1999)
  • J.C. Beier et al.

    Integrated vector management for malaria control

    Malar. J.

    (2008)
  • J.C. Beier et al.

    Attractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB) methods decimate populations of Anopheles malaria vectors in arid environments regardless of the local availability of favored sugar-source blossoms

    Malar. J.

    (2012)
  • G. Benelli et al.

    Declining malaria, rising of dengue and Zika virus: insights for mosquito vector control

    Parasitol. Res.

    (2016)
  • G. Benelli et al.

    Biological control of mosquito vectors: past, present and future

    Insects

    (2016)
  • G. Benelli

    Research in mosquito control: current challenges for a brighter future

    Parasitol. Res.

    (2015)
  • G. Benelli

    Plant-borne ovicides in the fight against mosquito vectors of medical and veterinary importance: a systematic review

    Parasitol. Res.

    (2015)
  • G. Benelli et al.

    Mosquito vectors of Zika virus

    Entomol. Gen.

    (2017)
  • S. Bhatt et al.

    The effect of malaria control on Plasmodium falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015

    Nature

    (2015)
  • A. Bhattarai et al.

    Impact of artemisinin-based combination therapy and insecticide-treated nets on malaria burden in Zanzibar

    PLoS Med.

    (2007)
  • K. Bourtzis et al.

    More than one rabbit out of the hat: radiation, transgenic and symbiont- based approaches for sustainable management of mosquito and tsetse fly populations

    Acta Trop.

    (2016)
  • R. Boyce et al.

    Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis (Bti) for the control of dengue vectors: systematic literature review

    Trop. Med. Int. Health

    (2013)
  • J.N. Burrows et al.

    New developments in anti-malarial target candidate and product profiles

    Malar. J.

    (2017)
  • M. Cabrera et al.

    An aggregation pheromone modulates lekking behavior in the vector mosquito Aedes aegypti (Diptera: culicidae)

    J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc.

    (2007)
  • E. Callaway et al.

    Anti-parasite drugs sweep Nobel prize in medicine 2015

    Nature

    (2015)
  • E. Capanna

    Grassi versus Ross: who solved the riddle of malaria?

    Int. Microbiol.

    (2006)
  • C.J. Chaccour et al.

    Ivermectin to reduce malaria transmission II. Considerations regarding clinical development pathway

    Malaria J.

    (2017)
  • C.J. Chaccour et al.

    Ivermectin to reduce malaria transmission III. Considerations regarding regulatory and policy pathways

    Malaria J.

    (2017)
  • C. Chaccour et al.

    Ivermectin to reduce malaria transmission I. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations regarding efficacy and safety

    Malar. J.

    (2017)
  • J.D. Charlwood et al.

    Male size does not affect mating success of Anopheles gambiae in São Tomé

    Med. Vet. Entomol.

    (2002)
  • Y.A. Derua et al.

    Change in composition of the Anopheles gambiae complex and its possible implications for the transmission of malaria and lymphatic filariasis in north-eastern Tanzania

    Malar. J.

    (2012)
  • A. Diabate et al.

    Targeting male mosquito mating behaviour for malaria control

    Parasit. Vector

    (2015)
  • A. Diabate et al.

    Spatial distribution and male mating success of Anopheles gambiae swarms

    BMC Evol. Biol.

    (2011)
  • A. Enayati et al.

    Malaria management: past, present, and future

    Annual Rev. Entomol.

    (2010)
  • H.M. Ferguson et al.

    Ecology: a prerequisite for malaria elimination and eradication

    PLoS Med.

    (2010)
  • U. Fillinger et al.

    Integrated malaria vector control with microbial larvicides and insecticide-treated nets in western Kenya: a controlled trial

    Bull. World Health Organ.

    (2009)
  • D. Fish

    Vector-borne Diseases: Understanding the Environmental, Human Health and Ecological Connections

    (2008)
  • C.M. Fornadel et al.

    Analysis of Anopheles arabiensis blood feeding behavior in southern Zambia during the two years after introduction of insecticide-treated bed nets

    Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.

    (2010)
  • Cited by (230)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text