Bone–implant interface strength and osseointegration: Biodegradable magnesium alloy versus standard titanium control
Introduction
Commonly used titanium and stainless steel implants as well as currently approved bioabsorbable polymers have specific drawbacks in bone surgery. The former are associated with stress shielding phenomena [1] and, particularly in paediatric and adolescent patients, require a second intervention for implant removal. The latter may cause adverse tissue reactions [2], [3], [4] and are not suitable for load-bearing applications due to their limited mechanical properties [5], [6]. Thus, new implant materials combining excellent strength retention properties, biodegradability and improved biocompatibility are desired in orthopaedic and trauma surgery.
Biodegradable magnesium alloys – a new class of degradable biomaterials – may be promising candidates and have recently attracted much attention. In contrast to commonly used titanium or steel implants, biodegradable magnesium alloys obviate the need for a second surgical intervention for implant removal and minimize stress shielding effects due to their elastic modulus, which is close to that of bone [1]. Furthermore, biodegradable magnesium alloys are more suitable for load-bearing applications due to their excellent mechanical properties [1]. The low corrosion resistance of magnesium – the major limitation for its use in musculoskeletal surgery – has been improved by appropriate alloy composition [7], [8], [9], [10], as well as by surface treatments and coatings [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], during the last few years. Moreover, several authors reported good biocompatibility [7], [8], [9], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20] of these alloys and there is some evidence that magnesium may have stimulatory effects on new bone formation [1], [8], [21].
The achievement of a mechanically stable bone–implant interface is particularly critical to the successful clinical use of orthopaedic implants. Hence, with regard to the feasibility of biodegradable magnesium alloys in musculoskeletal surgery, it is of utmost importance to assess their bone implant fixation strength in vivo and to relate these findings to those obtained for currently used titanium implants. Although the mechanical quality of the bone–implant interface can have a dramatic effect on the success or failure of the implanted degradable device, this issue has not yet been addressed.
Thus, it was the aim of the present study to evaluate bone–implant interface strength and osseointegration of a biodegradable magnesium alloy implant in a rat transcortical model. The study hypothesis was that the investigated magnesium alloy exhibits properties at least equal to those of a standard titanium rod.
Section snippets
Implants
In the present study, unthreaded uncoated smooth cylindrical-shaped pins were used. The investigated degradable implant was made of a new biodegradable magnesium alloy (chemical composition: Mg–Y–Nd–HRE; Young’s modulus 45 GPa, yield strength 200 MPa, ultimate tensile strength 280 MPa; surface roughness according to DIN EN ISO 4287: Ra = 0.76 ± 0.09 μm) based on the composition of WE43, developed and manufactured by Magnesium Elektron UK (Manchester, UK) and supplied by Synthes Corporation (Oberdorf,
Results
Seven of the 72 rats were lost intraoperatively due to anaesthetic complications or femoral fracture in consequence of drilling. All other animals tolerated the operation well and regained full weight-bearing capability. Healing occurred uneventfully and no signs of local inflammation, gross infection or tissue reaction could be observed clinically throughout the implantation period.
Discussion
In this study, we have shown that bone–implant interface strength and osseointegration of the investigated biodegradable magnesium alloy is significantly greater than that of a standard titanium alloy control in a rat transcortical model. We also demonstrated that in vivo degradation of this magnesium implant neither induces a systemic inflammatory reaction nor affects the cellular blood composition.
Conclusions
In the present study, we have shown that the tested biodegradable magnesium alloy rods yielded a significantly higher bone–implant interface strength than titanium controls, expressed by three well-established biomechanical parameters. Furthermore, μCT revealed an enhanced bone response to the investigated magnesium alloy, as indicated by significantly increased bone implant contact and higher BV/TV. In addition, no severe inflammatory reactions were observed in any test animal. Our results
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dipl.-Ing. Gerald Holzlechner for designing the test fixture and Dr. Michael Jamek for excellent technical assistance. Additionally we would like to thank Mag. Stefan Tangl for the histological work-up of the specimen. The study was partially financed by a third-party fund provided by the Synthes GmbH in Oberdorf, Switzerland and by the Lorentz Boehler Fund provided by the Lorentz Boehler Foundation, Vienna, Austria. S.B. is employed by the Synthes GmbH,
References (46)
- et al.
Magnesium and its alloys as orthopedic biomaterials: a review
Biomaterials
(2006) - et al.
Clinical biocompatibility of biodegradable orthopaedic implants for internal fixation: a review
Biomaterials
(2000) - et al.
In vitro corrosion and biocompatibility of binary magnesium alloys
Biomaterials
(2009) - et al.
In vivo corrosion of four magnesium alloys and the associated bone response
Biomaterials
(2005) - et al.
Research on an Mg–Zn alloy as a degradable biomaterial
Acta Biomater
(2010) - et al.
Magnesium alloys as implant materials – principles of property design for Mg–RE alloys
Acta Biomater
(2010) - et al.
In vitro degradation and mechanical integrity of Mg–Zn–Ca alloy coated with Ca-deficient hydroxyapatite by the pulse electrodeposition process
Acta Biomater
(2010) - et al.
A study on alkaline heat treated Mg–Ca alloy for the control of the biocorrosion rate
Acta Biomater
(2009) - et al.
On the biodegradation performance of an Mg–Y–RE alloy with various surface conditions in simulated body fluid
Acta Biomater
(2009) - et al.
The development of binary Mg–Ca alloys for use as biodegradable materials within bone
Biomaterials
(2008)
In vitro and in vivo corrosion measurements of magnesium alloys
Biomaterials
Platelet rich plasma and fresh frozen bone allograft as enhancement of implant fixation. An experimental study in dogs
J Orthop Res
Bone–implant interface shear modulus and ultimate stress in a transcortical rabbit model of open-pore Ti6Al4V implants
J Biomech
A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants
J Prosthet Dent
Action of FGMgCO3Ap–collagen composite in promoting bone formation
Biomaterials
Magnesium-sputtered titanium for the formation of bioactive coatings
Acta Biomater
The effect of surface chemistry modification of titanium alloy on signalling pathways in human osteoblasts
Biomaterials
Adverse tissue reactions to bioabsorbable fixation devices
Clin Orthop Relat Res
Osteolysis after biodegradable pin fixation of fractures in children
J Bone Joint Surg Br
Development of new, biodegradable implants
Chirurg
Bioabsorbable implants in orthopaedics: new developments and clinical applications
J Am Acad Orthop Surg
Controlling the biodegradation rate of magnesium using biomimetic apatite coating
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater
Influence of surface modification on the in vitro corrosion rate of magnesium alloy AZ31
J Biomed Mater Res A
Cited by (356)
Nanofibrous chitin/Andrias davidianus skin secretion bioactive sponges with tunable biodegradation rates for bleeding wounds treatment
2024, Chemical Engineering JournalTuning the long-term corrosion behaviour of biodegradable WE43 magnesium alloy by PEO coating
2023, Surface and Coatings TechnologyMultiscale morphological analysis of bone microarchitecture around Mg-10Gd implants
2023, Bioactive Materials
- 1
These authors contributed equally to this work.