Clinical investigations: acute ischemic heart diseasePublic recognition of major signs and symptoms of heart attack: seventeen states and the US Virgin Islands, 2001
Section snippets
Methods
The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System is a state-based random digit-dialed telephone survey conducted by state health departments in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.8 Samples represent each state's civilian, noninstitutionalized, adult population aged ≥18 years. The survey includes core questions asked of all participants every year or every other year and modules on specific public health topics. In 2001, 17 states and the US Virgin Islands included
Results
Sample characteristics are shown in Table I. Most participants (95%) recognized chest pain or discomfort as a heart attack symptom (Table II). Most participants also identified pain or discomfort in the arm or shoulder (89%) and shortness of breath (87%) as heart attack symptoms. Fewer participants indicated that pain in the jaw, neck, or back (51%) or that feeling weak, light-headed, or faint (65%) were symptoms. However, approximately one third of participants also incorrectly classified
Discussion
Definitive treatment for heart attack is early revascularization with either angioplasty or thrombolytic therapy.10, 11 Patient outcomes are improved with either therapy when initiated as soon as possible. Heart attack symptom recognition is logically tied to taking action to receive prompt emergency care. Although most persons recognized chest pain as a heart attack symptom, results from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction suggest that 33% of patients admitted to a hospital with a
References (39)
- et al.
Causes of delay in seeking treatment for heart attack symptoms
Soc Sci Med
(1995) - et al.
Mass media interventions to reduce help-seeking delay in people with symptoms of acute myocardial infarctiontime for a new approach?
Patient Educ Counseling
(2002) - et al.
Effect of a two-year public education campaign on reducing response time of patients with symptoms of acute myocardial infarction
Am J Cardiol
(1991) - et al.
Persistence of delays in presentation and treatment for patients with acute myocardial infarctionthe GUSTO-I and GUSTO-III experience
Ann Emerg Med
(2002) - et al.
Use of emergency medical services for suspected acute cardiac ischemia among demographic and clinical patient subgroupsthe REACT trial. Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment
Prehosp Emerg Care
(2002) - et al.
Extent of, and factors associated with, delay to hospital presentation in patients with acute coronary disease (the GRACE registry)
Am J Cardiol
(2002) - et al.
Treatment-seeking behavior for acute myocardial infarction symptoms in North America and Australia
Heart Lung
(2000) - et al.
Psychosocial factors related to unrecognized acute myocardial infarction
Am J Cardiol
(1995) - et al.
Perceptions of chest pain differ by race
Am Heart J
(2002) - et al.
Missed opportunities to impact fast response to AMI symptoms
Patient Educ Counseling
(2000)
2002 heart and stroke statistical update
Sudden cardiac death in the United States, 1989 to 1998
Circulation
State-specific mortality from sudden cardiac death—United States, 1999
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
Healthy people 2010 (conference edition, in 2 volumes)
Warning signs of a heart attack
Circulation
State-specific prevalence of selected chronic disease-related characteristics—Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2001
MMWR Surveill Summ
SUDAAN user's manual, release 7.0
Cited by (76)
Wireless high-frequency NLOS monitoring system for heart disease combined with hospital and home
2020, Future Generation Computer SystemsIs denial a maladaptive coping mechanism which prolongs pre-hospital delay in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction?
2016, Journal of Psychosomatic ResearchCitation Excerpt :The patients were recruited from the university or municipal hospitals, which have a coronary care unit and belong to the Munich emergency system network hospitals (see the acknowledgement). The main inclusion criterion was the diagnosis of STEMI as evidenced by typical clinical symptoms including: chest pain/discomfort lasting for 10–20 min or more (not responding fully to nitroglycerine), radiation of the pain to the neck, lower jaw, or left arm, dyspnea, or syncope [11]; ECG changes and myocardial biomarkers levels [12]. Patients were excluded from the study if they had to be resuscitated, if AMI occurred while already hospitalized and if they were unable to answer the questionnaires properly due to language barriers or cognitive impairment.
Patients’ knowledge about symptoms and adequate behaviour during acute myocardial infarction and its impact on delay time: Findings from the multicentre MEDEA Study
2016, Patient Education and CounselingCitation Excerpt :Indeed, there is a considerable room for improving patients’ knowledge about AMI [9–11]. While knowledge on typical symptoms such as chest pain might have improved over years, knowledge of atypical symptoms is less evident [11–14]. Nevertheless and surprisingly, there is no clear evidence that educating patients on AMI-related symptoms actually improves their knowledge, enables them to quickly make decision during acute event and ultimately reduce the prehospital delay time.
Delays in the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome: Focus on pre-hospital delays and non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction
2016, International Journal of Cardiology