Clinical InvestigationsAcute Ischemic Heart DiseaseVerapamil-sustained release–based treatment strategy is equivalent to atenolol-based treatment strategy at reducing cardiovascular events in patients with prior myocardial infarction: An INternational VErapamil SR-Trandolapril (INVEST) substudy
Section snippets
Study population
This is a prespecified substudy analysis from the INVEST. Details of the protocol, inclusion, exclusion criteria, and primary outcome were previously reported.15, 16 Briefly, INVEST was conducted as a multinational, prospective, randomized, open-label study with blinded end point assessment (PROBE [Prospective Randomized Open Blinded Endpoint] design). Hypertensive patients ≥50 years old, with stable CAD, were randomly assigned to either a verapamil-SR–based strategy or an atenolol-based
Results
Among the patients with a prior MI in the INVEST cohort, 3,622 (50.2%) patients had been assigned to the verapamil-SR–based strategy and 3,596 (49.8%) patients to the atenolol-based strategy.
Discussion
This study focused on hypertensive patients with prior MI in the INVEST cohort, and the results indicated equivalence between the verapamil-SR– and atenolol-based strategies for the risk of cardiovascular events. Drug-dose modeling for the risk of primary outcome showed no significant differences in risk based on the drugs or the doses.
Conclusions
In patients with prior MI and hypertension, a heart rate–lowering calcium antagonist–based (+ trandolapril + HCTZ, if needed) strategy is equivalent to a β-blocker–based (+ HCTZ + trandolapril, if needed) strategy for the prevention of cardiovascular events, with greater subjective feeling of well-being and a trend toward decreased incidence of angina pectoris and stroke in the calcium antagonist–based treatment group. Thus, in hypertensive patients with a prior MI unable to tolerate a
References (26)
- et al.
Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomized trials
Prog Cardiovasc Dis
(1985) - et al.
Risk of gastrointestinal haemorrhage with calcium antagonists in hypertensive persons over 67 years old
Lancet
(1996) - et al.
Characteristics of a contemporary population with angina pectoris. TIDES Investigators
Am J Cardiol
(1994) - et al.
Rationale and design of the International Verapamil SR/Trandolapril Study (INVEST): an Internet-based randomized trial in coronary artery disease patients with hypertension
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1998) - et al.
Should beta blockers remain first choice in the treatment of primary hypertension? A meta-analysis
Lancet
(2005) - et al.
Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol
Lancet
(2002) Effect of carvedilol on outcome after myocardial infarction in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction: the CAPRICORN randomised trial
Lancet
(2001)- et al.
Are beta-blockers effective in elderly patients who undergo coronary revascularization after acute myocardial infarction?
Arch Intern Med
(2000) - et al.
Are beta-blockers efficacious as first-line therapy for hypertension in the elderly? A systematic review
JAMA
(1998) - et al.
National evaluation of adherence to beta-blocker therapy for 1 year after acute myocardial infarction in patients with commercial health insurance
Am Heart J
(2006)
Long-term compliance with beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and statins after acute myocardial infarction
Eur Heart J
Medical Research Council trial of treatment of hypertension in older adults: principal results. MRC Working Party
BMJ
Beta-blocker therapy and depression
JAMA
Cited by (0)
This work was presented in part at the 2007 Annual Scientific Session of the American College of Cardiology in New Orleans, LA, on March 26, 2007.
This study was supported by grants from the University of Florida (Gainesville, FL) and Abbott Laboratories (Abbott Park, IL).