Original ContributionPatient safety analysis of the ED care of patients with heart failure and COPD exacerbations: a multicenter prospective cohort study☆,☆☆
Introduction
Acute exacerbations of heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are common complaints for patients visiting the emergency department (ED). Combined, these conditions account for over 1.2 million annual ED visits in the United States [1], [2]. These patients can be challenging to treat in the ED setting due to frequent co-morbid diseases, complex medication regimens, inconsistency in outpatient specialist care and ED crowding [1], [3]. The decision to admit or discharge patients with these conditions is currently not guided by evidence as there are no ED-based clinical practice guidelines for the acute care of heart failure or acute exacerbations of COPD. Existing international and national clinical practice guidelines for these conditions address limited components of acute care but there are few ED specific recommendations [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. This creates challenges when evaluating the quality of emergency care for acute exacerbations of both of these conditions since the assessment and management is specific and differs from chronic maintenance care.
One widely cited quality indicator for ED care is unplanned return visits [15], [16], [17]. Previously, researchers have documented a high frequency of return ED visits within 30 days for patients with heart failure (14%-25%) and COPD (27%-43%) [18], [19], [20], [21]. This raises potential patient safety concerns. Furthermore, a large population-based study has identified that heart failure patients discharged from the ED are at high risk of early death [19].
It is not known what proportion of return ED visits for these patients are related to health care received on the index visit, thus representing adverse events. The overall aim of this study was to evaluate patient safety concerns for this ED population and seek areas for improvement. Specifically, our objectives were to determine: (1) the frequency of adverse events following discharge from the ED for patients with acute exacerbations of heart failure or COPD; (2) the frequency of adherence to evidence-based care for these populations; and (3) any association between lack of adherence to evidence-based care and the occurrence of adverse events.
Section snippets
Methods
We conducted our study with patients discharged from five EDs with acute exacerbations of heart failure and COPD. We evaluated the ED management of these patients for adherence to evidence-based care and the occurrence of adverse events.
Results
Overall, 228 (21.2%) patients of the 1718 enrolled discharged patients returned to the ED within 14 days. Fig. 1 illustrates study patient flow.
Of the 122 flagged outcomes, over half of the patients (65, 53.3%) were discharged home at the return ED visit and a smaller proportion (52, 42.6%) were admitted (see Table 1). Five patients (4.1%) died. We compared the patient characteristics of our cohort with the 953 patients not eligible for the patient safety analysis and there were no significant
Main findings
We found that a significant proportion of ED patients discharged with the diagnoses of acute heart failure and acute exacerbations of COPD returned to the ED within 14 days. We noted strong adherence to evidence based care for heart failure and moderate adherence for COPD. Of those who returned to the ED, 10% experienced adverse events, 100% of which were deemed preventable. Despite higher adherence to evidence based care for patients with acute heart failure, the majority of adverse events
Conclusions
This study confirms that there are high rates of return ED visits for patients with acute heart failure or COPD exacerbations. Despite this, we found that only a small proportion is related to index ED care. We believe disposition decision making for both conditions needs to be improved to reduce the highly preventable and clinically significant adverse events we found. Development and implementation of evidence-based, emergency-specific guidelines for the management of these patient conditions
Acknowledgments
Thank you to Laura Carr for her assistance in coordinating data collection, Angela Marcantonio for her assistance with REB applications and grant preparation and MyLinh Tran for assistance with data analysis. Thank you to Ria Cagaanan for assistance with manuscript preparation. Thank you also to the members of our expert panel: Drs. Curtis Lavoie, Shena Riff, Elizabeth Shouldice and Nicholas Chagnon. Thank you also to all the site investigators for overseeing data collection and for the
References (32)
- et al.
Canadian Cardiovascular Society Consensus Conference recommendations on heart failure update 2007: Prevention, management during intercurrent illness or acute decompensation, and use of biomarkers
Can J Cardiol
(2007) - et al.
Clinical policy: Critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with acute heart failure syndromes
Ann Emerg Med
(2007) - et al.
Acute heart failure syndromes: emergency department presentation, treatment, and disposition: current approaches and future aims
Circulation
(2010) - et al.
Improved care of acute exacerbation of chronic pulmonary disease in two academic emergency departments
Int J Emerg Med
(2009) - et al.
Risk factors of hospitalization and readmission of patients with COPD exacerbation—systematic review
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis
(2007) - et al.
Canadian Thoracic Society recommendations for management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease—2008 update—highlights for primary care
Can Respir J
(2008) - et al.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)—diagnostic code: 496. Province of British Columbia 2009
- et al.
The 2007 GOLD Guidelines: a comprehensive care framework
Respir Care
(2009)NICE guideline - Clinical Guideline 12: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Standards for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients with COPD. Version 1.2
2009 Focused Update: ACCF/AHA Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults. A report of the American College of Cardiology foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Developed in Collaboration with the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation
Circulation
ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008. The task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA) and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM)
Eur Heart J
Development of a consensus on evidence-based quality of care indicators for Canadian emergency departments—ICES investigative report
A&E clinical quality indicators data definitions
Cited by (12)
Adverse Events Among Emergency Department Patients With Cardiovascular Conditions: A Multicenter Study
2021, Annals of Emergency MedicineCitation Excerpt :Disagreements (such as 1 reviewer assigned a 5/6 and others less than 3/6) were resolved by consensus. We defined adverse event types (eg, diagnostic error, management error, unsafe disposition decision, adverse drug reaction) in accordance with previous adverse event studies.10,15,17 Adverse events could be of more than one type.
Adverse event and error of unexpected life-threatening events within 24 hours of ED admission
2017, American Journal of Emergency MedicineCitation Excerpt :Prior study with return ED visits as a trigger demonstrated that 58% of adverse events resulted in transient minor disability and 1% resulted in death [13]. Another study pertaining to patient safety analysis of ED patients with heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease found that 75% adverse events were with symptoms only and 8.3% resulted in death [21]. We found three sentinel events with mortality.
Characteristics and outcomes for acute heart failure in elderly patients presenting to the ED
2016, American Journal of Emergency MedicineRates and predictive factors of return to the emergency department following an initial release by the emergency department for acute heart failure
2018, Canadian Journal of Emergency MedicineThe feasibility of an interactive voice response system (IVRS) for monitoring patient safety after discharge from the ED
2018, Emergency Medicine Journal
- ☆
Competing interests: none to declare.
- ☆☆
Funding: Physician Services Incorporated and University of Ottawa Department of Emergency Medicine.