Major ArticleWorking with symptoms of a respiratory infection: Staff who care for high-risk individuals
Section snippets
Study design
A cross-sectional survey and an anonymous business reply envelope was distributed to HCWs at VA Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Centers during the spring of 2003. Follow-up surveys were mailed 4 weeks later with a note that requested only one response per participant. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at the Edward Hines Jr., VA and the VA Puget Sound/University of Washington.
Setting
HCWs in this study provided care and services to individuals with SCI&D at 23 nationwide VA SCI
Results
The overall response rate for the survey was 53% (n = 820). Respondents included practitioners (13%), nurses (57%), and therapists/psychosocial workers (30%). Of those who were surveyed, 67% of the practitioners, 43% of nurses, and 74% of therapists/psychosocial workers responded to the survey. Sixty-seven people were excluded because they did not report whether they experienced a respiratory infection during the influenza season; the final sample was 753.
Table 1 shows demographic and work
HCWs with a respiratory infection
Ritchie et al20 found that respiratory illness was the number one cause of sickness absence in a cohort of HCWs (although the authors used a broader definition of HCWs than the current study, over half of their study cohort were nurses, similar to the current study). Over one third of HCWs (36%) caring for individuals with SCI&D reported experiencing symptoms of a respiratory infection during the influenza season (November 2002–March 2003). In a non-SCI population, Weingarten et al21 reported
Conclusion
Overall, the issue of respiratory illness and consequent attendance practices among HCWs is challenging to “solve.” On one hand, appropriately staying home from work while ill, may lead to patient safety concerns due to staff shortages; on the other hand, working while symptomatic may result in passing infectious agents to other staff and to patients and/or compromised work behaviors (e.g., slower reaction times, reduced alertness), which also have implications for patient safety. Further
References (40)
- et al.
Influenza control in acute care hospitals
Am J Infect Control
(1997) - et al.
Nosocomial influenza infection among post-influenza-vaccinated patients with severe pulmonary diseases
J Infect
(2003) - et al.
Barriers to influenza vaccine acceptance: a survey of physicians and nurses
Am J Infect Control
(1989) - et al.
Requiring influenza vaccination for health care workers: seven truths we must accept
Vaccine
(2005) - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Influenza vaccination of health-care personnel: recommendations of the...
- et al.
Influenza A among hospital personnel and patients: implications for recognition, prevention, and control
Arch Intern Med
(1989) Occupationally acquired infections in health care workers: part I
Ann Intern Med
(1996)- et al.
An outbreak of influenza A (H3N2) in a well immunized nursing home population
J Am Geriatr Soc
(1992) - et al.
Influenza surveillance in an acute-care hospital
Arch Intern Med
(1988) - et al.
Absenteeism among hospital staff during an influenza epidemic: implications for immunoprophylaxis
CMAJ
(1984)
Epidemiological and clinical aspects of influenza
Transmission of influenza: implications for control in health care settings
Clin Infect Dis
Influenza vaccination of health care workers in long-term-care hospitals reduces the mortality of elderly patients
J Infect Dis
Vaccines for persons at high risk due to medical conditions, occupation, environment, or lifestyle, 2005
J Fam Pract
Prevention and control of influenza: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)
MMWR
Disruption of services in an internal medicine unit due to a nosocomial influenza outbreak
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol
Effectiveness and cost benefit of an influenza vaccination program for health care workers
Can J Infect Dis
Absenteeism among hospital staff during influenza epidemic
CMAJ
Cited by (0)
This material is based upon work supported by the Office of Research and Development, Health Services Research, and Development Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs.