Meeting paper
AUGS paper
Trends in inpatient prolapse procedures in the United States, 1979–2006

Presented at the 30th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Urogynecologic Society, Hollywood, FL, Sept. 24-26, 2009.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.017Get rights and content

Objective

We sought to describe national trends for inpatient procedures for pelvic organ prolapse from 1979–2006.

Study Design

The National Hospital Discharge Survey was analyzed for patient and hospital demographics, as were International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnostic and procedures codes from 1979–2006. Age-adjusted rates (AARs) per 1000 women were calculated using the 1990 US Census data.

Results

There was a significantly decreasing trend in the AARs for inpatient prolapse procedures, from 2.93–1.52 per 1000 women from 1979–2006. AARs for hysterectomy decreased from 8.39–4.55 per 1000 women from 1979–2006. Over the study period, AARs remained at about the 1979 level among the women ≥52 years old (2.73–2.86; P = .075). In women <52 years old, AARs declined to less than one-third of the 1979 rate (3.03–0.84; P < .001).

Conclusion

AARs for inpatient procedures for prolapse in the United States remained stable for women aged ≥52 years from 1979–2006; rates declined by two-thirds for women aged <52 years.

Section snippets

Materials and Methods

Methods have been previously described.10 Deidentified data were abstracted from the NHDS, a federal dataset utilizing a multistate probability sampling of inpatient hospital discharges in the United States. Medical records from 466 nonfederal short-stay hospitals, approximately 8% of all US hospitals, were selected by systematic random sampling. Approximately 270,000 discharges were collected per year from January 1979–December 2006. The survey recorded up to 7 discharge diagnosis codes and 4

Results

According to NHDS data, approximately 5,632,900 inpatient procedures for prolapse were performed in the United States from 1979–2006. The number of women undergoing prolapse procedures decreased from 231,100 in 1979 to 186,900 in 2006. AARs of prolapse surgery per 1000 women also decreased, from 2.93 in 1979 to 1.52 in 2006 (Figure 1). When stratified by age, the AAR for women aged ≥52 years was 2.73 in 1979 and 2.86 in 2006, while in women aged <52 years the AAR declined from 3.03–0.84 (Figure

Comment

Overall, rates of inpatient surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse declined from 1979–2006. However, AARs for inpatient prolapse procedures for women ≥52 years old have remained stable from 1979–2006, while rates have declined by two-thirds for women <52 years old. The decrease in overall numbers of procedures and AARs reflects a decline in number of procedures performed in women <52 years old. We believe the dramatic decrease in inpatient prolapse procedures performed in women <52 years

Cited by (99)

  • Risk factors of lower urinary tract injury with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy

    2022, AJOG Global Reports
    Citation Excerpt :

    Although bladder injuries are generally detected intraoperatively, 62%–87% of ureteral injuries are unrecognized.7,26–28 In patients with unrecognized injuries compared with recognized ureteral injuries, the odds of 90-day readmission and acute renal failure are increased 24-fold, with the odds of fistula and sepsis increased 6-fold and 2-fold, respectively.7 These injuries are also more difficult to manage when detected postoperatively.

  • Rectal prolapse and pelvic descent

    2021, Current Problems in Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    POP affects millions of women. Approximately 200,000 inpatient surgical procedures for prolapse are performed annually in the United States.85,86 One in 5 women will undergo surgery for prolapse or incontinence by 80 years of age, and up to 30% of these women will require a second pelvic floor operation.87,88

View all citing articles on Scopus

Cite this article as: Jones KA, Shepherd JP, Oliphant SS, et al. Trends in inpatient prolapse procedures in the United States, 1979–2006. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;200:501.e1-7.

Reprints not available from the authors.

This study was supported by Grant no. UL1 RR024153 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NCRR or NIH. Information on NCRR is available at http://www.ncrr.nih.gov.

View full text