Meeting paperAUGS paperTrends in inpatient prolapse procedures in the United States, 1979–2006
Section snippets
Materials and Methods
Methods have been previously described.10 Deidentified data were abstracted from the NHDS, a federal dataset utilizing a multistate probability sampling of inpatient hospital discharges in the United States. Medical records from 466 nonfederal short-stay hospitals, approximately 8% of all US hospitals, were selected by systematic random sampling. Approximately 270,000 discharges were collected per year from January 1979–December 2006. The survey recorded up to 7 discharge diagnosis codes and 4
Results
According to NHDS data, approximately 5,632,900 inpatient procedures for prolapse were performed in the United States from 1979–2006. The number of women undergoing prolapse procedures decreased from 231,100 in 1979 to 186,900 in 2006. AARs of prolapse surgery per 1000 women also decreased, from 2.93 in 1979 to 1.52 in 2006 (Figure 1). When stratified by age, the AAR for women aged ≥52 years was 2.73 in 1979 and 2.86 in 2006, while in women aged <52 years the AAR declined from 3.03–0.84 (Figure
Comment
Overall, rates of inpatient surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse declined from 1979–2006. However, AARs for inpatient prolapse procedures for women ≥52 years old have remained stable from 1979–2006, while rates have declined by two-thirds for women <52 years old. The decrease in overall numbers of procedures and AARs reflects a decline in number of procedures performed in women <52 years old. We believe the dramatic decrease in inpatient prolapse procedures performed in women <52 years
References (15)
The hidden epidemic of pelvic floor dysfunction: achievable goals for improved prevention and treatment
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2005)- et al.
Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence in the United States, 1979-1997
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2003) - et al.
Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States
Obstet Gynecol
(2001) The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of subjects seen for routine gynecologic care
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2000)- et al.
The demographics of pelvic floor disorders: current observation and future projections
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2001) - et al.
Trends in stress urinary incontinence inpatient procedures in the United States, 1979-2004
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2009) - et al.
Racial characteristics of women undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2007)
Cited by (99)
Risk factors of lower urinary tract injury with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
2022, AJOG Global ReportsCitation Excerpt :Although bladder injuries are generally detected intraoperatively, 62%–87% of ureteral injuries are unrecognized.7,26–28 In patients with unrecognized injuries compared with recognized ureteral injuries, the odds of 90-day readmission and acute renal failure are increased 24-fold, with the odds of fistula and sepsis increased 6-fold and 2-fold, respectively.7 These injuries are also more difficult to manage when detected postoperatively.
Rectal prolapse and pelvic descent
2021, Current Problems in SurgeryCitation Excerpt :POP affects millions of women. Approximately 200,000 inpatient surgical procedures for prolapse are performed annually in the United States.85,86 One in 5 women will undergo surgery for prolapse or incontinence by 80 years of age, and up to 30% of these women will require a second pelvic floor operation.87,88
A Meshless Practical Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy Modification and Long-term Outcomes
2020, Journal of Minimally Invasive GynecologyIncidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism events after different routes of pelvic organ prolapse repairs
2020, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologySymptomatic pelvic organ prolapse in middle-aged women: a national matched cohort study on the influence of childbirth
2020, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Cite this article as: Jones KA, Shepherd JP, Oliphant SS, et al. Trends in inpatient prolapse procedures in the United States, 1979–2006. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;200:501.e1-7.
Reprints not available from the authors.
This study was supported by Grant no. UL1 RR024153 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NCRR or NIH. Information on NCRR is available at http://www.ncrr.nih.gov.