Clinical opinionObstetricsPlanned home birth: the professional responsibility response
Section snippets
Patient safety
Discussion of patient safety is best based on evidence about obstetric outcomes.12, 13, 14, 15 ACOG in its statement accepts the finding of Wax et al16 that there is a 2-fold to 3-fold risk of neonatal death from planned home vs hospital birth.11 ACOG takes the view that pregnant women should be informed about this risk.11
The RCOG and RCM Joint Statement goes further and claims that planned home birth is a “safe option for many women.”10 This claim does not withstand close scrutiny for planned
Patient satisfaction
The raison d'etre for planned home birth is increased patient satisfaction. The RCOG-RCM statement emphasizes that the focus should not be exclusively on the physical safety of planned home birth. It is also important to “acknowledge and encompass issues surrounding emotional and psychological well-being.” Birth for women is a rite of passage and a family life event, as well as being the start of a lifelong relationship with her infant.”10
The RCOG-RCM statement is correct to emphasize the
Cost-effectiveness
In the United States and throughout the world fiscal responsibility and accountability have become essential components in clinical practice and organizational leadership.44 It might at first appear that planned home birth offers the potential for cost-savings by avoiding a relatively more expensive hospital admission. The Birthplace in England national cohort study “priced” planned home birth, birth in freestanding midwifery units, “alongside” midwifery units, and obstetric units at,
Respect for women's rights
There are 2 ways in which respect for women's rights can be understood. The first starts with the right of the woman to make decisions and control what happens to her body. The physician is bound to acknowledge and implement the patient's preferences, without constraint. This is a purely contractual model of the physician-patient relationship in which the woman protects herself by the exercise of her autonomy-based rights. “In a democratic society, a woman has the right to choose where she
What should obstetricians do to address the root cause of the recrudescence of planned home birth?
The first professional responsibility of obstetricians is to ensure that hospital delivery is safe, respectful, and compassionate.53, 54, 55, 56 Current, inappropriate practices may be fueling the recrudescence of planned home birth. Physician leaders need to closely scrutinize organizational policies and practices and should see to it that staffing is competent and adequate. Well-trained, compassionate in-house attending obstetric and anesthesia coverage should be required for all hospitals
Conclusion
Advocacy of planned home birth is a compelling example of what happens when ideology replaces professionally disciplined clinical judgment and policy. We urge obstetricians, other concerned physicians, midwives, and other obstetric providers, and their professional associations to eschew rights-based reductionism in the ethics of planned home birth and replace rights-based reductionism with an ethics based on professional responsibility.
References (63)
- et al.
Characteristics of women giving birth at home in Sweden: a national register study
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2006) - et al.
The association between hospital obstetrical volume and maternal postpartum complications
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2012) - et al.
Where should I have my baby?
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2012) - et al.
Perinatal high reliability
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2011) Reflections on pandemics, past and present
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2011)- et al.
Maternal and newborn outcomes in planned home birth vs. planned hospital births: a metaanalysis
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2010) - et al.
The perils of the imperfect expectation of the perfect baby
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2010) - et al.
The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics: avoiding the perils of clashing rights
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2011) - et al.
Achievement of the 30-minute standard in obstetrics—can it be done?
Am J Obstet
(2012) Decision to incision: time to reconsider
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2012)
The moral foundation of medical leadership: the professional virtues of the physician as fiduciary of the patient
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Perinatal high reliability
Am J Obstet Gynecol
A comprehensive obstetrics patient safety program improves safety climate and culture
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Effect of a comprehensive patient safety program on compensation payments and sentinel events
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Managing disruptive behavior in the health care setting: focus on obstetric services
Am J Obstet Gynecol
Home births in the United States, 1990-2009. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Trends and characteristics of home vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in the United States and selected states
Obstet Gynecol
Mommy wars: the prequel
The midwife as status symbol
Home birth–proceed with caution
Lancet
Society for Quality in Outpatient Obstetrics homepage
Case of Ternovszky v. Hungary (Application no. 67545/09)European Court of Human Rights
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and Royal College of Midwives Joint Statement no. 2. April, 2007Home births
Committee Opinion no. 476. Committee on Obstetric Practice. Planned home birth
Obstet Gynecol
Planned home and hospital births in South Australia, 1991-2006: differences in outcomes
Med J Aust
Drive times to hospitals with perinatal care in the United States
Obstet Gynecol
Woman, 36, who campaigned for home births dies having baby daughter at home
The role of the paediatrician in the effort to prevent congenital malformations
Pediatric Rev
Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study
BMJ
Evaluation of 280,000 cases in Dutch midwifery practices: a descriptive study
BJOG
Cited by (0)
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Reprints are not available from the authors.