Original Research
Gynecology
BRCA mutational status, initial disease presentation, and clinical outcome in high-grade serous advanced ovarian cancer: a multicenter study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.036Get rights and content

Background

In the last decades, there have been several efforts to clarify the role of BRCA mutational status in women with advanced ovarian cancer, demonstrating its role in cancer development, as well as the prognostic significance of BRCA genotype.

Objective

Our aim is to evaluate the correlation between BRCA mutational status and disease presentation in a large series of advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients.

Study Design

This is a retrospective multicenter study including a consecutive series of newly diagnosed high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC-IV disease, at least 18 months of follow-up time, and tested for BRCA 1/2 germline mutation status. Disease presentation was analyzed using the following variables: laparoscopic predictive index value, incidence of bulky lymph nodes, and ovarian masses. Progression-free survival was defined as the months elapsed from initial diagnosis (staging laparoscopy) and recurrent disease or last follow-up.

Results

In all, 324 high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients received BRCA testing, and 273 fulfilled inclusion criteria. BRCA1/2 germline mutations were observed in 107 women (39.2%). No differences were documented according to BRCA mutation status in terms of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, CA125 levels, or presence of ascites. In patients with BRCA1/2 mutations we observed a higher incidence of peritoneal spread without ovarian mass (25.2% vs 13.9%; P value = .018) and of bulky lymph nodes (30.8% vs 17.5%; P value = .010) compared with women showing BRCA1/2 wild type genotype. Furthermore, women with BRCA1/2 mutations showed high peritoneal tumor load (laparoscopic predictive index value ≥8; 42.1% vs 27.1%; P value = .016) more frequently. Focusing on survival, no differences in term of median progression-free survival were observed among women treated with primary debulking surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the group of patients with BRCA1/2 mutations (P value = .268). On the other hand, in women showing BRCA wild type genotype, median progression-free survival after primary debulking surgery was 8 months longer compared with patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy approach (26 vs 18 months; P value = .003).

Conclusion

Women with BRCA1/2 mutations show at diagnosis higher peritoneal tumor load and increased frequency of bulky lymph nodes compared to patients without germline BRCA mutations. Primary debulking surgery seems to ensure a longer progression-free survival in women with BRCA wild type genotype compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. BRCA testing might be a reliable tool to personalize treatment in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer, thus giving novel points of discussion to the ongoing debate regarding the best initial treatment approach.

Introduction

After its first discovery, deficiency in homologous recombination due to deleterious BRCA1/2 gene mutations has been progressively recognized not only as a predictor of ovarian cancer susceptibility, but also as a prognostic factor.1, 2 In fact, an increased response rate to platinum-based chemotherapy,3 a longer progression-free survival (PFS),4, 5, 6 and a higher benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)7, 8 have been reported in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) patients with significant BRCA1/2 mutations, compared with women showing wild-type BRCA genotype.

Furthermore, the presence of deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations has been associated with a higher incidence of parenchymal disease at the time of relapse,9 thus suggesting that BRCA mutational status may also influence disease presentation. However, despite this encouraging evidence, scanty data are currently available regarding the correlation between BRCA mutational status and disease presentation at the time of diagnosis.10

In this context, it has also to be considered that tools to properly select newly diagnosed HGSOC patients suitable for complete primary debulking surgery (PDS) vs NACT are urgently needed; and the incorporation of BRCA testing into established surgical algorithm11, 12, 13, 14 may represent a future intriguing horizon in the era of precision medicine.

For these reasons, we evaluate the correlation between disease presentation at diagnosis and BRCA germline mutational status in a large series of advanced HGSOC patients. Survival outcome according to initial treatment strategy and BRCA mutational status has been also analyzed in the effort to evaluate whether integrated approaches may be proposed in the future.

Section snippets

Patients

We selected from our electronic database all women submitted to BRCA testing at the gynecologic oncology units of the Policlinico Gemelli Foundation of the Catholic University and La Sapienza University of Rome showing the following criteria: newly diagnosed HGSOC patients, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC-IV disease, at least 18 months of follow-up time.

Indications for gene testing slightly changed over the time accrual from positive familiar history only

Clinicopathological features

In all, 324 women with advanced ovarian cancer, admitted at our institutions, received BRCA testing from January 2013 through January 2016, and among these patients, 273 fulfilled inclusion criteria (high-grade serous histology, and a follow-up time of at least 18 months) and were included in the final analysis. Median time from diagnosis to BRCA testing was 15 months without differences according to BRCA mutational status. Clinically relevant BRCA1/2 germline mutations were observed in 107

Comment

In the precision medicine era, the incorporation of personalized approaches in the clinical management of HGSOC should be considered as the primary goal to be achieved.21 Over the last 2 decades, several efforts have been made to identify the hallmarks of ovarian cancer,22 thus making available a plethora of potentially useful biomarkers to stratify prognosis and establish personalized therapies. However, despite these encouraging results no molecular signatures have successfully entered

References (25)

Cited by (65)

  • Clinical outcome in patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer and germline BRCA1/2-mutation – real life data

    2021, Gynecologic Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, in this study gBRCA mutation status had a significant impact on PFS and OS. A recent report by Petrillo et al. showed higher tumor load and a more diffuse intraperitoneal tumor spread in patients with gBRCA than in non-gBRCA patients measured on the basis of the laparoscopic predictive index (6). Therefore, they reported that significantly more complex surgical procedures were necessary in gBRCA patients than in non-gBRCA patients to achieve complete macroscopic tumor resection.

  • Chemotherapy resistance in epithelial ovarian cancer: Mechanisms and emerging treatments

    2021, Seminars in Cancer Biology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Interestingly, according to the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project data, up to 51 % of HGSOC cases are characterized by defective HRR pathway [146]. Considering that BRCA1 and BRCA2 are largely restricted to the HGSOC subtype and are mainly a risk factor for this histotype -notably 25 % HGSOC harbor somatic and germline BRCA1/2 mutations [147] - the subsequent homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) promotes platinum sensitivity due to an accumulation of double-strand breaks after platinum chemotherapy. In addition, mBRCA patients can also be sensitive to other DNA damage-inducing regimens, such PARP inhibitors, because of the deficiency in HRR.

View all citing articles on Scopus

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Cite this article as: Petrillo M, Marchetti C, De Leo R, et al. BRCA mutational status, initial disease presentation, and clinical outcome in high-grade serous advanced ovarian cancer: a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;217:334.e1-9.

View full text