Cognitive sequelae of methanol poisoning involve executive dysfunction and memory impairment in cross-sectional and long-term perspective
Introduction
Methanol is an industrial solvent that acts as a neurotoxin when ingested. A mass methanol poisoning is often the result of its use as a cheap substitute for ethanol (Hovda et al., 2005, Paasma et al., 2007, Zakharov et al., 2014c). This was the case in the Czech Republic, where from September 2012 to January 2013 a total of 121 subjects were intoxicated by methanol sold in adulterated alcoholic beverages containing a mixture of 20–50% methanol and 50–80% ethanol (Zakharov, Pelclova, Urban, et al., 2014). Empirical evidence related to the effect of methanol poisoning on the brain and behavior is limited (Paasma et al., 2007), with only a small number of case reports or studies on small cohorts of patients (Airas et al., 2008, Anderson et al., 1987, Bezdicek et al., 2014a). A cross-sectional study based on a large cohort of patients with methanol poisoning and without concomitant chronic alcohol abuse is so far lacking.
The pathophysiological mechanisms of methanol poisoning are well known (Zakharov et al., 2014b, Zakharov et al., 2014c). Methanol poisoning has toxic effects due to its metabolite formic acid, preponderantly on the retina, optic nerve, and other parts of the central nervous system (CNS) (Jacobsen and McMartin, 1986, Kraut and Kurtz, 2008, Mégarbane et al., 2005, Sanaei-Zadeh et al., 2011b). The accumulation of formic acid results in metabolic acidosis, damage to the basal ganglia (BG), and visual impairment when the concentration of formic acid is higher than 9.0–11.0 mmol/L (McMartin et al., 1977, Osterloh et al., 1986, Sanaei-Zadeh et al., 2011a, Sejersted et al., 1983, Zakharov et al., 2014a). Thus, methanol poisoning leads to metabolic changes and lesions in specific sites in the CNS, especially in the BG, and primarily in the putamen. The putamen is affected by hemorrhage and subsequent necrosis. To a lesser extent, subcortical white matter (SWM) lesions and demyelination or even atrophy of optic nerve occur (Arora et al., 2007, Blanco et al., 2006, Singh et al., 2013, Vaneckova et al., 2014, Vaneckova et al., 2015). Moreover, methanol is the metabolic precursor of formaldehyde (FA). FA at low concentrations can, in animal models, directly induce tau aggregation and amyloid β (Aβ) peptide deposits in vitro (Su, Monte, Hu, He, & He, 2016).
From previous findings, we hypothesize that methanol poisoning leads to a disruption of the functional architecture of frontostriatal circuitry (Alexander et al., 1986, DeLong and Wichmann, 2007, Owen, 2004) and cognitive decline (Su et al., 2016). The presumable assessment of “cognitive” impairment due to methanol poisoning should, therefore, include 1) assessment of executive function and working memory (WM), due to interconnection of the BG with the frontal lobes via the basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuits (Alexander & Crutcher, 1990); 2) assessment of motor speed due to possible loss of connectivity as a result of SWM lesions (Vaneckova et al., 2014, Vaneckova et al., 2015); and 3) long-term memory assessment due to a general toxic and apoptotic effect on the CNS and also an examination of visual scanning and sustained visual attention due to atrophy of the optic nerve (Bezdicek et al., 2014a, Su et al., 2016, Vaneckova et al., 2014, Vaneckova et al., 2015).
Furthermore, based on an a priori assumption, we hypothesized that chronic alcohol abusers are a subgroup of methanol-poisoned patients and may have a different type of cognitive impairment than “pure” methanol-poisoned patients (Pfefferbaum et al., 1997, Sullivan et al., 2010). We performed, therefore, a classification of methanol poisoning to methanol poisoning with no alcohol abuse and methanol poisoning with alcohol abuse on the basis of biochemical and addictological analyses. The primary objective of the present study was to show how well the methanol poisoning predicts possible cognitive deficits in a cross-sectional analysis and show their evolution in a long-term perspective. Second, we tried to disentangle the “pure” cognitive deficit induced by methanol poisoning with respect to deficits caused by chronic alcohol abuse and concomitant methanol poisoning. Third, we aimed to describe morphological correlates based on MRI that corroborate or refute the frontostriatal circuitry and cognitive deficit hypothesis.
Section snippets
Study participants
Mass methanol poisoning occurred in the Czech Republic between September 2012 and January 2013. From a total of 121 intoxicated subjects, 20 died outside the hospital, and 101 were hospitalized. Among hospitalized subjects, 60 survived without and 20 with visual/CNS sequelae, whereas 21 died (Zakharov, Pelclova, Urban, et al., 2014). The patients were treated with an antidote (ethanol or fomepizole), alkalization, folate substitution, and intermittent or continuous hemodialysis (Zakharov
Theory/calculation
The neuropsychological battery was constructed to cover the hypothesized cognitive impairment detailed above: 1) NART/CRT, a culturally adapted version of the National Adult Reading Test for determining the premorbid level of intelligence (Krámská, 2014); 2) Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for determining general cognitive impairment (Folstein et al., 1975, Štěpánková et al., 2015); 3) sustained auditory and visual attention: Digit Span forward from WAIS-III and the Trail Making Test, part
Complete samples
Demographic, biochemical, toxicological, and neurological characteristics of the complete patient (METH) and control sample (CS) are depicted in Table 1. Most of the patients had only minimal neurological impairment, as can be seen in Table 1, with only one patient who reached a total score of 114 from 309. All other patients scored below 40.
Matched samples
With the exception of more males in the patient sample, we did not detect any significant differences between demographic variables (age, education in
Discussion
In the present study, we aimed to delimit the structure of cognitive impairment due to methanol poisoning by comparing patients with CS matched according to demographic characteristics, the premorbid level of intelligence, general cognitive functioning, and level of depressive symptoms. We obtained a large clinical sample with methanol poisoning (METH). Our results show specific cognitive impairment due to methanol poisoning in METH, which can be characterized as executive dysfunction
Conclusion
Our findings suggest that methanol poisoning causes executive dysfunction with explicit memory impairment due to BG dysfunction even in long-term perspective, and supports the hypothesis that methanol poisoning leads to a disruption of the functional architecture of frontostriatal circuitry.
References (58)
- et al.
Methanol intoxication-induced nigrostriatal dysfunction detected using 6-[18F]fluoro-L-dopa PET
Neurotoxicology
(2008) - et al.
Functional architecture of basal ganglia circuits: Neural substrates of parallel processing
Trends in Neurosciences
(1990) The logic of neuropsychological research and the problem of patient classification in aphasia
Brain and Language
(1984)- et al.
"Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician
Journal of Psychiatric Research
(1975) - et al.
A PET study of word finding
Neuropsychologia
(1991) - et al.
Frontal assessment battery is a marker of dorsolateral and medial frontal functions: A SPECT study in frontotemporal dementia
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
(2008) - et al.
Acute methanol poisonings: Folates administration and visual sequelae
Journal of Applied Biomedicine
(2014) - et al.
Intermittent hemodialysis is superior to continuous veno-venous hemodialysis/hemodiafiltration to eliminate methanol and formate during treatment for methanol poisoning
Kidney International
(2014) - et al.
Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex
Annual Review of Neuroscience
(1986) - et al.
Neurologic sequelae of methanol poisoning
Canadian Medical Association Journal
(1987)