Research articleRandomized Trial of an Intervention to Facilitate Recycling for Relapsed Smokers
Introduction
Treating tobacco dependence is a national health priority with the potential to save millions of lives.1 Although many smokers try to quit every year,2 success rates are low for each attempt, and most smokers need to make multiple quit attempts before achieving long-term abstinence.3, 4, 5 These observations have lead to the recent assertion that tobacco dependence is a chronic condition requiring ongoing care and long-term follow-up.5 Offering repeat tobacco-dependence treatment is an essential component of this chronic disease model for tobacco-dependence treatment. Contrary to provider skepticism regarding patient interest in quitting,6 recent studies suggest that most smokers want to quit,7 and that there is considerable interest in repeat quit attempts (or “recycling”) among smokers who recently relapsed.8, 9 However, current evidence regarding best approaches to recycling is fairly limited. While the few studies that have evaluated the efficacy of repeat treatment found modest to no effect on cessation rates, most of these trials offered the same treatment used in the first attempt for use in the repeat attempt,10, 11, 12, 13 and all were efficacy trials conducted under highly controlled experimental conditions.10, 11, 12, 13, 14 Hence, additional studies evaluating alternative recycling approaches in real-world settings, including those that allow individuals to try a different pharmacologic or behavioral aid in the next quit attempt (or a combination of aids), are needed to inform implementation of the population-based approaches that will be required to support a chronic disease model for tobacco-dependence treatment.
The Recycling Smokers through Effective Treatment (or RESET) study implemented and evaluated an intervention that encouraged and facilitated recycling for relapsed smokers in a real-world setting. The intervention delivered information on patient smoking status and treatment preferences (elicited from a patient follow-up phone call) to providers (in the form of a computerized progress note), and encouraged providers to arrange the smoking-cessation assistance requested by the patient. This article summarizes the effects of this intervention on (1) receipt of repeat tobacco-dependence treatment, (2) number of quit attempts, (3) 7-day point prevalence abstinence, and (4) satisfaction with services in a population of smokers receiving care at Veterans Affairs (VA) medical facilities.
Section snippets
Objectives
The primary objective was to assess the intervention’s effectiveness for increasing repeat treatment for tobacco dependence. Secondary objectives included assessing the effect of the intervention on smoking behavior and satisfaction with services.
Population and setting
Veterans aged ≥19 years receiving a prescription for nicotine replacement therapy or bupropion for smoking cessation/Zyban (referred to hereafter as the index prescription) from one of the participating facilities were eligible for the study and were
Sample Characteristics
The average participant age was 55 years, 46% were married, 94% were male, 76% were Caucasian, and 85% of the sample had at least a high school education. Half of the sample reported fair to poor health and many had other documented chronic diseases. Most (66%) saw their primary care provider in the follow-up period. On average, patients reported smoking 27 cigarettes per day 2 years ago. Nicotine patch was the most common drug used in the index quit attempt (77% of the sample), followed by
Discussion and Conclusion
The RESET study used unique tools (pharmacy databases and electronic medical record functions) to identify smokers with a high probability of interest in quitting, and to facilitate recycling for them. The intervention facilitated recycling by (1) systematizing the follow-up of smokers making recent quit attempts, (2) collecting information on smoking status and treatment preferences, and (3) encouraging providers to ensure that treatment requested by patients was received. The results suggest
References (15)
- et al.
Differences in tobacco assessment and intervention practices: a regional snapshot
Prev Med
(2000) - et al.
Preventing 3 million premature deaths and helping 5 million smokers quit: a national action plan for tobacco cessation
Am J Public Health
(2004) - et al.
Cigarette smoking among adults—United States, 2003
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
(2005) - et al.
Use of the nicotine skin patch by smokers in 20 communities in the United States, 1992–1993
Tob Control
(1997) - et al.
Methods used to quit smoking in the United StatesDo cessation programs help?
JAMA
(1990) - et al.
Treating tobacco use and dependence
(2000) - et al.
Cigarette smoking among adults–United States 2002
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
(2004)
Cited by (22)
An updated algorithm for choosing among smoking cessation treatments
2013, Journal of Substance Abuse TreatmentCitation Excerpt :Whether this helps them make another quit attempt is unclear (Hughes & Carpenter, 2006). Oftentimes, smokers want to try to stop again in the near future (Partin et al., 2006), and there is no evidence supporting the common notion that smokers who wait before trying to quit again are more successful. If a smoker does want to try to quit again in the near future, clinicians should determine the likely reasons for the prior failure (e.g., psychosocial stressors, poor treatment adherence, distressing withdrawal symptoms, or use of alcohol) and suggest a new quit attempt with a new or revised treatment that is likely to address these reasons (Fiore, 2008).
An algorithm for choosing among smoking cessation treatments
2008, Journal of Substance Abuse TreatmentCitation Excerpt :Most smokers who relapse want to try to stop again in the near future (Partin et al., 2006), and there is no evidence for the common notion that smokers who wait before trying to quit again are more successful. The RCTs that explicitly tested retreatment (also known as recycling) of treatment failures found poor results (Partin et al., 2006). However, these studies used a one-time intervention, often used the same treatment that previously failed, and did not tailor the second treatment to the reasons the first treatment failed.
Mixed-mode administration reduced bias and enhanced poststratification adjustments in a health behavior survey
2007, Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyCitation Excerpt :The timing of the intervention phone call with respect to the prior quit attempt ranged from 4 to 9 months from the date of the last fill of the index prescription. Additional information on the study intervention and evaluation is available elsewhere [16,17]. Fig. 1 describes the flow of subjects through the study.
Re-engagement of Low-Income Smokers in Quitline Services: Effects of Incentives and Method of Contact
2023, Nicotine and Tobacco ResearchTelephone counselling for smoking cessation
2019, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews