American Journal of Preventive Medicine
School influenceVariation in Obesity Among American Secondary School Students by School and School Characteristics
Introduction
The distribution of obesity among American adolescents is known to vary by important individual factors, including gender and race/ethnicity.1, 2, 3, 4 Little is known, however, about the extent to which obesity varies by school factors, and this represents an important gap for scientific and policy-related purposes. This article focuses on a description of: (1) the extent to which student obesity (measured by body mass index [BMI]) and the percentage of students who are at or above the 85th percentile (that is, overweight or at risk of overweight) vary among American secondary schools, and (2) how BMI and percentage of students at or above the 85th percentile vary by certain key characteristics of the schools. That is, this article describes the extent to which these problems cluster by school and by particular characteristics of the school, thereby providing indications of the potential importance of contextual factors in the school and community.
This study focuses on broad-based school characteristics, including school type (public, Catholic private, non-Catholic private); school size (measured by number of students in the sampled grade); school socioeconomic status (SES, as indicated by average parental education reported by students); and racial/ethnic composition (derived from student self-identification). Two other contextual characteristics that vary between schools (but not within schools) are also considered—the region of the country and the population density of the community in which they are located.
The extent to which obesity varies by school is an important issue because it sets outer limits to how much school-level factors could “explain” variations in individual-level obesity at the point in time at which measurement occurs. The degree of variation among schools could change over time to the extent that independent and/or dependent characteristics such as school policies about cafeteria offerings, vending machines, or required physical education become more or less homogeneous. The extent to which obesity varies by school characteristics is of interest primarily in a descriptive sense. Knowing whether obesity clusters by certain school characteristics can serve to focus future attention and resources on understanding the mechanisms by which these characteristics contribute to obesity in young people and to develop interventions that target these characteristics in order to prevent and reduce obesity.
Section snippets
Methods
Fourteen years of data (1991–2004) were examined from 8th-, 10th-, and 12th-grade students who participated in the University of Michigan’s Monitoring the Future (MTF) project, sponsored by the National Institute on Drug Abuse. Data analyses were conducted in 2006 and 2007.
Results
Table 1 shows mean BMI and the proportion at or above the 85th percentile for each grade for each year from 1991 to 2004. There is a clear general upward trend in both measures, as reported in more detail elsewhere.10 Table 2 provides the percentage of variance, also called the intraclass coefficient (ICC), that is between schools for BMI and for being at or above the 85th percentile, separately for grades 8, 10, and 12 from 1991 to 2004. Calculations were performed separately for each year,
Discussion
Although at present the great majority of the variation in BMI resides within schools, there remains enough variation between schools for school characteristics and school policies and programs to have had important effects on their students’ BMI. This is about equally true at all three grade levels included in this study. Although the ICC for BMI is only about 3%, it remains true that schools could have substantially more influence in the future. The figure of 3% reflects the maximum impact
Conclusion
Although a fair amount is known about how individual characteristics relate to BMI among adolescents, less is known about the extent to which BMI varies by school and by school characteristics. This study shows that although most variation in BMI lies within schools, there is sufficient between-school variation to be of interest to policymakers. School SES is shown to be of some importance, even after controlling for individual-level SES and race/ethnicity. In sum, the school one attends has
References (20)
- et al.
Indexes of obesity and comparisons with previous national survey data in 9- and 10-year-old black and white girls: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study
J Pediatr
(1994) - et al.
Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic status differences in overweight and health-related behaviors among American students: national trends 1986–2003
J Adolesc Health
(2006) - et al.
Body mass index as a measure of adiposity among children and adolescents: a validation study
J Pediatr
(1998) - et al.
Reliability and validity of self-reported height and weight among high school students
J Adolesc Health
(2003) - et al.
Measuring the prevalence of overweight in Texas schoolchildren
Am J Public Health
(2004) - et al.
Childhood overweight in a New York City WIC population
Am J Public Health
(2004) - et al.
The Monitoring the Future project after twenty-seven years: design and proceduresMonitoring the Future Occasional Paper No. 54
(2001) - et al.
Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2004Volume I: Secondary school students
(2005) - et al.
Standardized percentile curves of body-mass index for children and adolescents
Am J Dis Child
(1991) - et al.
SAS system for mixed models
(1996)
Cited by (70)
Context Matters: Adolescent Neighborhood and School Influences on Young Adult Body Mass Index
2019, Journal of Adolescent HealthCommunity Organizing for Healthier Communities: Environmental and Policy Outcomes of a National Initiative
2016, American Journal of Preventive MedicineCross-sector analysis of socioeconomic, racial/ethnic, and urban/rural disparities in food policy enactment in the United States
2016, Health and PlaceCitation Excerpt :In several models, we found statistically significant interactions between median household income and other predictors (p<.05), and therefore all analyses of median household income were repeated after stratifying by predominant race/ethnicity and urbanicity. Predominant race/ethnicity was based on whether the community was at least 66.7% non-Hispanic White, 50% non-Hispanic Black, 50% Hispanic, or “other” (i.e., racially/ethnically mixed) if it met none of the first three criteria (O'Malley et al., 2007). In stratified analyses, communities were grouped into 6 categories – 1) urban and non-Hispanic White, 2) suburban and non-Hispanic White, 3) rural and non-Hispanic White, 4) non-Hispanic Black, 5) Hispanic, and 6) Other racial/ethnic composition.