Evaluation and Monitoring of Patients with Acute Heart Failure Syndromes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.07.019Get rights and content

Advanced heart failure (HF) is associated with frequent hospitalizations, poor quality of life, and increased mortality. Despite optimal medical management, readmission rates remain high and account for approximately two thirds of all costs related to HF management. Evaluation of patients with HF is critical for the appropriate selection and monitoring of therapy as well as for the prevention of recurrent hospitalizations. This evaluation can be complex and relies on integration of the bedside evaluation and information available from invasive and other noninvasive diagnostic techniques. The clinical examination remains the cornerstone of HF evaluation. Key features of the history and physical examination can be used to assign hemodynamic profiles based on the absence or presence of congestion and adequacy of perfusion. These hemodynamic profiles provide prognostic information and may be used to guide therapy. Direct measurement of hemodynamics may be helpful in patients in whom the physical examination is limited or discordant with symptoms. Although the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) is not recommended during routine therapy of patients hospitalized with HF, it is reasonable to consider the use of PAC monitoring to adjust therapy in patients who demonstrate recurrent or refractory symptoms despite ongoing standard therapy adjusted according to clinical assessment. This is particularly relevant in centers with experience in hemodynamic monitoring for HF. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) testing has been shown to facilitate diagnosis of the etiology of dyspnea in the urgent setting for patients without a prior diagnosis of HF. Furthermore, BNP levels provide important prognostic information in patients with chronic HF, but serial BNP testing has not been validated as a guide to inpatient or outpatient management. Echocardiographic assessment can provide prognostic information about ventricular function and size as well as information about hemodynamic status. Development of validated and reproducible noninvasive techniques to monitor patients with acute HF will be an important step in maximizing interventions to improve outcomes in this patient population.

Section snippets

Symptoms

Many physicians rely on the symptom history to assess a change in clinical status. A primary objective of advanced HF treatment is to resolve symptoms and improve functional capacity; therefore, therapy should encompass attention to symptoms and symptom relief. Patients with AHFS usually present with symptoms of worsening fluid retention or decreasing exercise tolerance and fatigue. Symptoms of congestion may be related to increased left or right ventricular filling pressures. Dyspnea on

Invasive Pulmonary Artery Catheter Use in Acute Heart Failure Syndromes

Introduction of the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) in the early 1970s allowed physicians to obtain detailed information not easily gained from physical or laboratory evaluations. The use of the invasive PAC remains a pivotal component of management for patients in cardiogenic shock or other life-threatening circulatory compromise. After demonstration of the efficacy of acute intravenous vasodilator therapy transitioning to oral vasodilator therapy, some centers used the PAC to manage more

Laboratory Assessment of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes

Recognition of the role of neurohormones in the pathophysiology of HF has led to several studies suggesting that increased neurohormonal levels—including plasma renin activity, norepinephrine, endothelin-1, and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP)—correlate with the severity of HF symptoms16 and prognosis.17 Of these, only BNP is a significant, independent predictor of elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in patients with HF.18 Given the limitations of the clinical evaluation, there has

Other Noninvasive Techniques in Acute Heart Failure Syndromes

Integral to the evaluation and monitoring of patients with AHFS is an understanding of the underlying physiologic state and hemodynamic balance. Currently, invasive hemodynamic monitoring (use of a PAC) is the “gold standard” in accomplishing this goal. Given the concerns and potential risks involved with PAC use, techniques to evaluate hemodynamics noninvasively continue to be investigated.

Conclusion

Hospitalization for AHFS identifies a sick patient population with a poor prognosis. Early identification and treatment of decompensation may prevent subsequent hospitalization and improve outcomes in this patient population. Clinical history and physical examination, although limited, are the primary tools for evaluating and monitoring AHFS. The PAC can provide a useful adjunct for evaluating hemodynamics and guiding therapy in select patient populations who have not responded well to initial

References (44)

  • K. Maeda et al.

    Plasma brain natriuretic peptide as a biochemical marker of high left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in patients with symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction

    Am Heart J

    (1998)
  • A. Maisel et al.

    Primary results of the Rapid Emergency Department Heart Failure Outpatient Trial (REDHOT)a multicenter study of B-type natriuretic peptide levels, emergency department decision making, and outcomes in patients presenting with shortness of breath

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2004)
  • R. Kazanegra et al.

    A rapid test for B-type natriuretic peptide correlates with falling wedge pressures in patients treated for decompensated heart failurea pilot study

    J Card Fail

    (2001)
  • G. Cotter et al.

    Accurate, noninvasive continuous monitoring of cardiac output by whole-body electrical bioimpedance

    Chest

    (2004)
  • F.L. Dini et al.

    Contrast-enhanced Doppler hemodynamics for noninvasive assessment of patients with chronic heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction

    J Am Soc Echocardiogr

    (2003)
  • S. Ghio et al.

    Prognostic usefulness of the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion in patients with congestive heart failure secondary to idiopathic or ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy

    Am J Cardiol

    (2000)
  • L.A. Zornoff et al.

    Right ventricular dysfunction and risk of heart failure and mortality after myocardial infarction

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2002)
  • L.W. Stevenson et al.

    The limited reliability of physical signs for estimating hemodynamics in chronic heart failure

    JAMA

    (1989)
  • G.A. Ewy

    The abdominojugular testtechnique and hemodynamic correlates

    Ann Intern Med

    (1988)
  • J.D. Sandham et al.

    A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients

    N Engl J Med

    (2003)
  • J.F. Berlauk et al.

    Preoperative optimization of cardiovascular hemodynamics improves outcome in peripheral vascular surgerya prospective, randomized clinical trial

    Ann Surg

    (1991)
  • M.S. Cuffe et al.

    Short-term intravenous milrinone for acute exacerbation of chronic heart failurea randomized controlled trial

    JAMA

    (2002)
  • Cited by (73)

    • Venom natriuretic peptides guide the design of heart failure therapeutics

      2020, Pharmacological Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Based on hemodynamic profile and congestion status, ADHF patients can be classified into four categories [10] (Fig. 1). Subset I (Warm and dry) patients exhibit no hypoperfusion and no severe congestion; Subset II (Warm and wet) patients exhibit congestion without hypoperfusion; Subset III (Cold and dry) patients exhibit hypoperfusion without congestion; and Subset IV (Cold and wet) patients exhibit both congestion and hypoperfusion [10]. Each of these categories of ADHF requires differing specific therapy.

    • Current Management of Heart Failure. When to Refer to Heart Failure Specialist and When Hospice is the Best Option.

      2015, Medical Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      HF is one of the most common causes of hospitalization in the United States with a very high cost to the health care system. In the United States there are 880,000 new HF diagnoses per year and 5 million cases currently identified.1–3 This article focuses on the etiology of left ventricle dysfunction, HF presentation, and the acute and chronic management of HF.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text