Coronary artery disease
Differentiation of Recent and Chronic Myocardial Infarction by Cardiac Computed Tomography

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.101Get rights and content

Clinical use of cardiac computed tomography is rapidly expanding, and its purpose may reach beyond noninvasive coronary angiography. We investigated the ability of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography to differentiate between recent and long-standing myocardial infarction (MI). Contrast-enhanced coronary computed tomographic (CT) scans (Siemens Sensation 64) of patients with a recent MI (<7 days, n = 16), long-standing MI (>12 months, n = 13), and no MI (n = 13) were retrospectively evaluated. To anticipate transmural variation of myocardial perfusion and to neutralize image noise, a series of thin, overlapping slices was created in parallel alignment to the myocardial wall. Within each of these slices, a small region of interest was placed at a constant in-plane position to measure the CT attenuation (Hounsfield units [HU]) at consecutive transmural locations of injured and normal remote myocardium. In addition, wall thickness and the myocardial cavity were measured. Significantly lower CT attenuation values were found in patients with long-standing MI (−13 ± 37 HU) than in those with acute MI (26 ± 26HU) and normal controls (73 ± 14 HU, p <0.001). The attenuation difference between infarcted and remote myocardia was larger in patients with long-standing MI than in patients with recent MI (89 ± 41 and 55 ± 33 HU, respectively, p <0.001). In addition, long-standing MI was associated with wall thinning (p <0.01), and ventricular dilation (p <0.05), whereas recent MI was not (p >0.05). In conclusion, recent and long-standing MIs may be differentiated by computed tomography based on myocardial CT attenuation values and ventricular dimensions.

Section snippets

Patient population

Using the radiology referral system we identified patients who underwent CT coronary angiography between November 2004 and April 2005 and had a history of MI. From medical records (i.e., serum markers, electrocardiograms, and coronary catheterization reports) the age of the MI was determined. Patients with a recent MI (within 1 week without further history of symptomatic heart disease) or long-standing MI (≥1 year previously and without reported cardiac events in the previous year) were

CT attenuation of infarcted myocardium

Regions of decreased CT attenuation (Hounsfield units [HU]) could be identified in long-standing and recent MIs. Lowest CT attenuation values were found in long-standing versus recent MIs (Figure 2 and Table 2). Although the minimum CT attenuation in normal (remote) myocardium varied substantially, even in patients without MIs, there was no significant difference across the 3 groups. In consequence, the difference between infarcted and remote myocardium was larger in long-standing than in

Discussion

The ability to distinguish recent MI from (previously unknown) long-standing MI has clinical value. In this study, we demonstrated that significantly lower CT attenuation values are measured in old infarctions compared with more recent myocardial injury. In a comparable study with 4-slice multidetector-row computed tomography, Nikolaou et al12 demonstrated a borderline significant difference in CT attenuation between recent (<1 month) and long-standing (>1 month) MI (44 ± 17 vs 63 ± 19 HU, p =

References (30)

  • Y. Masuda et al.

    The usefulness of x-ray computed tomography for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction

    Circulation

    (1984)
  • D. Georgiou et al.

    Conventional and ultrafast computed tomography in the detection of viable versus infarcted myocardium

    Am J Card Imaging

    (1992)
  • A. Schmermund et al.

    Measurement of myocardial infarct size by electron beam computed tomographya comparison with 99mTc sestamibi

    Invest Radiol

    (1998)
  • K. Nikolaou et al.

    Assessment of myocardial infarctions using multidetector-row computed tomography

    J Comput Assist Tomogr

    (2004)
  • U. Hoffmann et al.

    Acute myocardial infarctioncontrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT in a porcine model

    Radiology

    (2004)
  • Cited by (100)

    • Acute myocardial infarction on Nongated chest computed tomography

      2020, Radiology Case Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      Last, both acute and chronic MI can be detected as areas of hypodensity or perfusion defects in a coronary artery territory. Even though it has been suggested that longstanding MI can have ventricular dilation and significantly lower CT attenuation compared with an acute MI, these findings have only been reported in cardiac CT studies [8]. Therefore, although contrast-enhanced CT findings look promising and may be useful, especially in patients who present with atypical chest pain, further studies are needed to assess the complete role and significance of contrast-enhanced chest CT in the evaluation of acute M

    • Chronic Infarcts and Mimickers of Infarcts

      2019, Radiologic Clinics of North America
    • Acute Myocardial Infarct

      2019, Radiologic Clinics of North America
    • Chest pain CT in the emergency department: Watch out for the myocardium

      2018, European Journal of Radiology Open
      Citation Excerpt :

      Acute and chronic MI differs in regard to the attenuation of HM and myocardial thickness, with larger differences between affected and healthy myocardium and with thinner segments in chronic MI. It is well known that HM correlates with MI [14], and that acute and chronic MI can be differentiated based on myocardial attenuation values and by assessing myocardial thickness [18]. Various previous studies in different patient populations showed moderate to good sensitivities and good specificity in the detection of MI by assessing hypodense myocardium ranging between 67–88% and 85–98% respectively [19–21].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Dr. Nieman was supported by the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of The Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

    2

    Dr. Ferencik was supported by grant 1T32 HL076136-02 from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

    View full text