Coronary Artery Disease
Outcomes in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Clopidogrel Versus Prasugrel (from the INFUSE-AMI Trial)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.02.002Get rights and content

Prasugrel is more potent than clopidogrel, but it is not known whether this translates into clinical benefit in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bivalirudin for ST elevation myocardial infarction. In the Intracoronary Abciximab and Aspiration Thrombectomy in Patients With Large Anterior Myocardial Infarction trial, 452 patients with anterior STEMI undergoing primary PCI with bivalirudin were randomized to intralesional abciximab or placebo and to thrombus aspiration or no aspiration. Clopidogrel or prasugrel were administered at physician discretion. The primary end point was infarct size at 30 days by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical events at 30 days and 1 year were independently adjudicated. Propensity score was used to adjust for nonrandom allocation of the drugs. Prasugrel and clopidogrel were administered to 155 patients (34.3%) and 297 patients (65.7%), respectively. Patients receiving prasugrel were younger with higher left ventricular ejection fraction and greater use of drug-eluting stents. Prasugrel-treated patients had higher rates of procedural success (94% vs 89%, p = 0.03), Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 3 flow (95% vs 90%, p = 0.06), and lower corrected TIMI frame counts (21 ± 6 vs 23 ± 11, p = 0.008). At 30 days, infarct size was marginally lower in the prasugrel group (median [interquartile range] = 16.4% [6.5 to 20.0] vs 17.6% [8.1 to 25.7], p = 0.06). At 1 year, prasugrel group had significantly fewer deaths (1.3% vs 8.3%, p = 0.004) and fewer episodes of severe heart failure (2.0% vs 7.7%, p = 0.02). These findings persisted after propensity score adjustment. There were no significant differences in major bleeding. Stent thrombosis was 0% versus 2.5%, respectively, p = 0.054. We conclude that prasugrel was associated with improved efficacy and similar safety compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing primary PCI with bivalirudin.

Section snippets

Methods

In the INFUSE-AMI trial, 452 patients with anterior STEMI (culprit lesion in proximal or mid left anterior descending artery and TIMI flow grade 0 to 2) and anticipated symptom onset-to-reperfusion time of <5 hours underwent primary PCI with bivalirudin anticoagulation. All patients received aspirin and either clopidogrel or prasugrel at investigator discretion. They were randomized in a 2 × 2 factorial design to abciximab delivered locally at the site of the infarct lesion by means of the

Results

Prasugrel and clopidogrel were administered to 155 patients (34.3%) and 297 patients (65.7%), respectively. Baseline characteristics between the groups were well matched (Table 1), except prasugrel-treated patients were younger, had no previous stroke, had higher left ventricular ejection fraction, and greater use of drug-eluting stents. The results of primary PCI and 30-day IS are listed in Table 2. Prasugrel-treated patients had higher rates of procedural success (94% vs 89%, p = 0.03), TIMI

Discussion

In the INFUSE-AMI trial, use of prasugrel rather than clopidogrel in patients with large anterior myocardial infarction treated with bivalirudin anticoagulation was associated with a reduction in all-cause and cardiovascular death, in new onset of heart failure and in MACE, with nonsignificantly different rates of major bleeding. The number of patients in whom stent thrombosis developed was not sufficient to determine whether prasugrel was of benefit in reducing thrombotic events, although it

Disclosures

Drs. Mehran, Gibson and Stone served as consultants for Atrium Medical and The Medicine Company. The other authors have no disclosures.

References (12)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

See page 1460 for disclosure information.

View full text