Review
Multidetector Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.06.071Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

The study’s purpose was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (CT) for the detection of coronary artery disease.

Subjects and methods

A search of the literature in all languages was performed incorporating both electronic and manual components. Manual reference checks of recent reviews and all original investigations supplemented the electronic searches.

Results

Average sensitivity for patient-based detection of significant (>50% or ≥50%) stenosis was 61 of 64 (95%) with 4-slice CT, 276 of 292 (95%) with 16-slice CT, and 47 of 47 (100%) with 64-slice CT. Average specificity was 84% for 4-slice CT, 84% for 16-slice CT, and 100% for 64-slice CT. The sensitivity for a significant stenosis in evaluable segments was 307 of 372 (83%) with 4-slice CT, 1023 of 1160 (88%) with 16-slice CT, and 165 of 176 (94%) with 64-slice CT. Average specificity was 93% or greater with all multidetector CT. Seventy-eight percent of segments were evaluable with 4-slice CT, 91% with 16-slice CT, and 100% with 64-slice CT. Stenoses in proximal and mid-segments were shown with a higher sensitivity than distal segments. Left main stenosis was identified with high sensitivity with all multidetector CT, but sensitivity in other vessels increased with an increasing number of detectors.

Conclusion

Multidetector CT has the potential to be used as a screening test in appropriate patients. Contrast-enhanced 16-slice CT seems to be reasonably sensitive and specific for the detection of significant coronary artery disease but has shortcomings. Preliminary data with 64-slice CT suggest that it is more sensitive and specific.

Section snippets

Methods

We used established methods for systematic review.6, 7, 8 A broad search of the literature in all languages was performed incorporating both electronic and manual components. The electronic search was performed using PubMed, which includes MEDLINE, OLDMEDLINE, OVID, and the Cochrane Library database. PubMed was searched from 1950 (well before multidetector CT was developed) to March 2005. Search terms were as follows: spiral CT/spiral computed tomography matched with coronary artery, coronary

Results

The number of patients in whom blinded and unblinded data were reported using 4-, 8-, 16-, and 64-slice CT, and the reasons for investigation are shown in Table 1.10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 There were 617 patients who participated in blinded investigations with 4-slice CT,10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 50 patients who participated in blinded investigations with 8-slice CT,21, 22

Discussion

Pooled data indicate that 4-slice, 16-slice, and 64-slice CT are highly sensitive (95%–100%) for the patient-based detection of significant CAD. Specificity was lower (84%) with 4-slice and 16-slice CT, but 100% with a small sample of patients with 64-slice CT. For detection of significant stenosis in any segment, sensitivity increased from 83% with 4-slice CT to 88% with 16-slice CT and 94% with 64-slice CT. Sensitivity for significant stenosis in proximal and mid-segments was 90% or greater

References (73)

  • R. Leta et al.

    Non-invasive coronary angiography with 16 multidetector-row spiral computed tomographya comparative study with invasive coronary angiography

    Rev Esp Cardiol

    (2004)
  • A. Knez et al.

    Usefulness of multislice spiral computed tomography angiography for determination of coronary artery stenoses

    Am J Cardiol

    (2001)
  • S. Schroeder et al.

    Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multislice computed tomography

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2001)
  • P.J. De Feyter et al.

    Noninvasive multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. An emerging clinical modality

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2004)
  • S. Schroeder et al.

    Influence of heart rate on vessel visibility in noninvasive coronary angiography using new multislice computed tomographyexperience in 94 patients

    Clin Imaging

    (2002)
  • A. Crean et al.

    Cardiac imaging using nuclear medicine and positron emission tomography

    Radiol Clin North Am

    (2004)
  • J.C. Tardif et al.

    Delineation of extended lengths of coronary arteries by multiplane transesophageal echocardiography

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1994)
  • A. Schmermund et al.

    Intravenous electron-beam computed tomographic coronary angiography for segmental analysis of coronary artery stenoses

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1998)
  • M.J. Budoff et al.

    Intravenous three-dimensional coronary angiography using contrast enhanced electron beam computed tomography

    Am J Cardiol

    (1999)
  • M. Regenfus et al.

    Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenosis using contrast-enhanced three-dimensional breath-hold magnetic resonance coronary angiography

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2000)
  • T.A.M. Kaandorp et al.

    Magnetic resonance imaging of coronary arteries, the ischemic cascade, and myocardial infarction

    Am Heart J

    (2005)
  • S. Achenbach et al.

    Tomographic coronary angiography by EBCT and MDCT

    Prog Cardiovasc Dis

    (2003)
  • Dowe DA. The current status and future of coronary CT Angiography. Consultations in computed tomography. Available at:...
  • S. Achenbach et al.

    Noninvasive coronary angiography-an acceptable alternative?

    N Engl J Med

    (2001)
  • R.H. Kennedy et al.

    Cardiac-catheterization and cardiac-surgical facilitiesuse, trends, and future requirements

    N Engl J Med

    (1982)
  • L.W. Johnson et al.

    Coronary arteriography 1984-1987: a report of the Registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. I. Results and complications

    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn

    (1989)
  • AHA Hospital Statistics, 2006 Edition

    (2006)
  • P.M. Bossuyt et al.

    The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracyexplanation and elaboration

    Ann Intern Med

    (2003)
  • J.G. Lijmer et al.

    Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests

    J Am Med Assoc

    (1999)
  • D.J. Cook et al.

    Systematic reviewssynthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions

    Ann Intern Med

    (1997)
  • W.G. Austen et al.

    A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association

    Circulation

    (1975)
  • C. Gaudio et al.

    Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery stenoses by multidetector-row spiral computed tomography; comparison with conventional angiography

    Eur Rev Med Pharm Sci

    (2005)
  • A.W. Leber et al.

    Non-invasive intravenous coronary angiography using electron beam tomography and multislice computed tomography

    Heart

    (2003)
  • Y. Sato et al.

    Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery disease by multislice spiral computed tomography using a new retrospectively ECG-gated image reconstruction technique

    Circ J

    (2003)
  • C.R. Becker et al.

    Detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice helical CT angiography

    J Comput Assist Tomogr

    (2002)
  • C. Herzog et al.

    Visualization techniques in multislice CT-coronary angiography of the heart. Correlations of axial, multiplanar, three-dimensional and virtual endoscopic imaging with the invasive diagnosis

    Rofo

    (2001)
  • Cited by (142)

    • Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial computed tomography perfusion imaging to detect myocardial ischemia: a comparison with coronary flow velocity reserve derived from transthoracic Doppler echocardiography

      2020, Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cardiac CT has been used for anatomical evaluation of stenosis, plaques, and calcification. CT angiography (CTA) is a noninvasive assessment for the presence of coronary stenosis, and is used clinically as a standard modality to diagnose ischemic heart disease (IHD) [1–3]. Although anatomical information on the coronary arteries is indispensable for the diagnosis of CAD, an evaluation of myocardial ischemia provides more important prognostic information beyond the severity of organic coronary stenosis.

    • Coronary computed tomography angiography alone versus confirmatory functional testing for guiding treatment strategy for patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis

      2015, American Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      From January 2006 to December 2011, we recruited all the patients who had chest pain and underwent coronary CTA as an initial assessment13–20 into the coronary CTA registry of the Seoul National University Hospital.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text