Review
Hemoconcentration-guided Diuresis in Heart Failure

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.06.009Get rights and content

Abstract

One quarter of patients hospitalized for heart failure are readmitted within 30 days, perhaps related to ineffective decongestion. Limited data exist guiding the extent and duration of diuresis in patients hospitalized for heart failure. The objective of this review was to determine the prognostic value of hemoconcentration, or the relative increase in the cellular elements in blood, in patients hospitalized for heart failure and to clarify its role in guiding inpatient diuretic practices. Six post hoc retrospective studies from 2010 to 2013 were available for review. Hemoconcentration was consistently associated with markers of aggressive fluid removal, including higher diuretic dosing and reduced body weight, but increased risk of in-hospital worsening renal function. Despite this, hemoconcentration was associated with improved short-term mortality and rehospitalization. Hemoconcentration is a practical, readily available, noninvasive, economically feasible strategy to help guide diuresis and monitor congestion relief in patients hospitalized for worsening heart failure. Clinicians should strongly consider using changes in hemoglobin and hematocrit as an adjunct to other available measures of decongestion and clinical acumen in inpatient heart failure care.

Section snippets

Concentrating on the Problem: Optimizing Volume and Quality

Despite adequate relief of clinical symptoms during hospitalization and incremental reductions in hospital length of stay,4 postdischarge mortality and rehospitalization remain exceedingly high. Approximately 20% to 25% of all hospitalized patients with heart failure are readmitted within 30 days, with more than 60% of them returning to the hospital within the first 15 days.5 Of these 30-day readmissions, 35% are related directly to heart failure and may reflect inadequate decongestion during

Pitfalls of Traditional Approaches

Although the type9 and intensity10 of volume removal have become a focus of recent trials, data are scarce regarding the optimal duration and therapeutic targets of inpatient volume reduction therapy. A number of parameters are currently being used empirically in the tailoring of inpatient diuresis, including resting or exertional symptoms, urine output, natriuretic peptide levels,11 orthostasis,12 renal function,13 body weight,14 and intravascular volume.15 We currently lack randomized

Hemoconcentration: A Review of the Available Data

Hemoconcentration has been broadly applied to various medical conditions, attempting to serve as a surrogate of intravascular volume status. It is widely accepted in contemporary risk stratification and prognostication in pancreatitis.33 Over the last decade, hemoconcentration has been introduced as a possible target for therapy in heart failure.34 Hemoconcentration was first evaluated retrospectively in 336 patients hospitalized for heart failure in the ESCAPE trial by Testani et al.35

Hemoconcentration: Considerations and Qualifications

Several retrospective, post hoc studies have shed light on the association between hemoconcentration and clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for heart failure. However, it is important to recognize that none of these studies have assessed the applicability and routine use of hemoconcentration to guide clinical decision-making compared with usual care in a prospective, randomized fashion. It is plausible that healthier patients (including those with normal or near normal baseline renal

A Proposed Hemoconcentration-Guided Therapeutic Strategy

We have developed a potential algorithm for hemoconcentration-guided therapy that requires further validation and prospective testing (Figure 1). Hemoconcentration must be used in conjunction with other available clinical parameters in the frequent assessment and reassessment of intensity and duration of diuresis.

Conclusions

Hemoconcentration is a practical, readily available, noninvasive, economically feasible strategy to help guide diuresis and monitor congestion relief in patients hospitalized for worsening heart failure. Clinicians should strongly consider using changes in hemoglobin and hematocrit as an adjunct to other available measures of decongestion and clinical acumen in inpatient heart failure care. Hemoconcentration may provide incremental insight into prognosis and whether worsening renal function

References (43)

  • J.M. Testani et al.

    Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with improvement in renal function during the treatment of decompensated heart failure

    J Card Fail

    (2011)
  • J.D. Baillargeon et al.

    Hemoconcentration as an early risk factor for necrotizing pancreatitis

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (1998)
  • A. Boyle et al.

    Redefining the therapeutic objective in decompensated heart failure: hemoconcentration as a surrogate for plasma refill rate

    J Card Fail

    (2006)
  • C. Davila et al.

    Clinical correlates of hemoconcentration during hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure

    J Card Fail

    (2011)
  • P. van der Meer et al.

    The predictive value of short-term changes in hemoglobin concentration in patients presenting with acute decompensated heart failure

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2013)
  • J. Oh et al.

    Hemoconcentration is a good prognostic predictor for clinical outcomes in acute heart failure: data from the Korean Heart Failure (KorHF) Registry

    Int J Cardiol

    (2013)
  • J.M. Testani et al.

    Timing of hemoconcentration during treatment of acute decompensated heart failure and subsequent survival: importance of sustained decongestion

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2013)
  • H. Bueno et al.

    Trends in length of stay and short-term outcomes among Medicare patients hospitalized for heart failure, 1993-2006

    JAMA

    (2010)
  • K. Dharmarajan et al.

    Diagnoses and timing of 30-day readmissions after hospitalization for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, or pneumonia

    JAMA

    (2013)
  • M. Metra et al.

    Early dyspnoea relief in acute heart failure: prevalence, association with mortality, and effect of rolofylline in the PROTECT Study

    Eur Heart J

    (2011)
  • M. Vaduganathan et al.

    Thirty-day readmissions: the clock is ticking

    JAMA

    (2013)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Treatment of Cardiorenal Syndrome

      2019, Cardiology Clinics
      Citation Excerpt :

      When achieved, hemoconcentration has been shown to be associated with increased fluid removal, high-diuretic doses, and reduced body weight, while carrying an increased risk of in-hospital WRF. Even with changes in renal function, hemoconcentration has improved short-term mortality and rates of readmission, suggesting that not all fluctuations in creatinine correlate to a poor prognosis.9 Regardless of the diuretic regimen, diuretic resistance is common, especially in patients with severe HF symptoms, and has been reported to occur in 30% of patients with HF on diuretic therapy.10

    • Worsening renal function during decongestion among patients hospitalized for heart failure: Findings from the Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness (ESCAPE) trial

      2018, American Heart Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Given variability in assessment of clinical congestion, and issues regarding the feasibility, invasive nature of PAC, other objective markers of decongestion have been evaluated.19 Attainment of hemoconcentration during an acute HF hospitalization has been associated with more aggressive diuretic use, weight loss, reductions in filling pressures, and, importantly, improvement in short term mortality.8,20,21 Similarly, higher levels of plasma volume, estimated non-invasively, have been independently associated with increased cardiovascular mortality9,22,23 and a decrease of the estimated plasma volume during a hospitalization for HF and beyond the hospitalization were associated with better outcomes.9,23

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Funding: None.

    Conflict of Interest: MV and SJG: None. GCF receives research support from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (significant) and is a consultant to Medtronic (modest), Gambro (significant), and Novartis (significant). AAV receives consultancy fees and research grants from Alere, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardio3 Biosciences, Celladon, Johnson & Johnson, Merck/MSD, Novartis, Servier, Torrent, Trevena, and Vifor. JB receives research support from the National Institutes of Health, European Union, Health Resources and Services Administration, and U.S. Food and Drug Administration; is a consultant to Amgen, Bayer, Celladon, Gambro, GE Healthcare, Janssen, Medtronic, Novartis, Ono, Relypsa, and Trevena; and has stock options in Stemedica. MG is a consultant to Abbott Laboratories, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer HealthCare AG, CorThera, Cytokinetics, DebioPharm S.A., Errekappa Terapeutici, GlaxoSmithKline, Ikaria, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis Pharma AG, Otsuka Pharmaceuticals, Palatin Technologies, Pericor Therapeutics, Protein Design Laboratories, Sanofi-Aventis, Sigma Tau, Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Takeda Pharmaceutical, and Trevena Therapeutics.

    Authorship: All authors had access to the data and played a role in writing this manuscript.

    View full text