Original contributionModifications of Miccoli minimally invasive thyroidectomy for the low-volume surgeon☆,☆☆,★
Introduction
After nearly a hundred years of performing a thyroidectomy essentially the way it was described by Theodore Kocher [1] in the 19th century, the past decade has seen dramatic changes in modern surgical technique [2], [3]. Much of this change has been technologically driven, with the introduction of high-resolution endoscopy [4], [5]. advanced energy devices [6], [7], and the evolution of robust laryngeal nerve monitoring [8], [9]. In addition to a faster and probably safer thyroidectomy, the possibility of accomplishing this procedure through a smaller incision has been widely recognized and increasingly embraced [10], [11], [12].
Several teams of surgeons around the world led the search for a less invasive and more cosmetically appealing approach to a thyroidectomy [13], [14], [15]. Miccoli and his colleagues [16] in Pisa deserve the credit for advancing the most viable approach, which has ultimately been incorporated by a number of high-volume practices [17]. The essential features of this approach include a small cervical incision and a technique that is gasless and relies on conventional retraction, all of which are aided by the magnification afforded with a 5-mm angled laparoscope. The principal advantages are improved visualization, superior cosmetic outcome, and increased patient satisfaction. A downstream benefit that has been derived is the possibility of true outpatient surgery [18], particularly when combined with laryngeal nerve monitoring [9].
Because of the unusual nature of the endocrine practice in Pisa (surgical volumes exceeding 3000 cases per year), widespread application of this technique has been somewhat limited and, for practical purposes, has been confined to high-volume surgeons who have plentiful skilled assistants. We have introduced a number of modifications to this technique that serve to facilitate performance of the procedure and thereby potentially broaden its application beyond high-volume centers. These modifications are composed of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative interventions. Although these are particularly helpful for endoscopic and minimally invasive surgery, most of them also serve to make conventional thyroid surgery easier and more straightforward.
Section snippets
Methods and materials
A planned analysis of a prospectively maintained database was undertaken after Institutional Review Board approval was granted. Demographic and surgical data from a single-surgeon series of consecutive thyroidectomies from 2003 to 2009 were obtained and analyzed with attention to age, sex, pathology, incision lengths, and complications. Specific modifications of the classically reported Miccoli thyroidectomy are described below. Some of these maneuvers were identified in a previous report [3].
Results
From a single surgeon series of 785 consecutive thyroidectomies, 178 patients were identified who underwent an endoscopic minimally invasive thyroidectomy. This cohort includes 36 thyroidectomies analyzed in a previous pilot study of this technique that was described 4 years ago [22]. There were 159 women and 19 men, with an overall mean age of 46.0 ± 14.8 years. The mean incision length was 2.3 ± 0.4 cm, and 24.2% of pathology specimens revealed malignancy (39 papillary carcinomas, 3
Discussion
Miccoli and his colleagues [2], [4], [13], as well as several other surgical groups in Europe and Asia [14], [15], revolutionized the field of thyroid surgery with their deliberate development of less invasive techniques for the management of individuals with thyroid and parathyroid disease. Although these techniques have been embraced by high-volume surgical groups, challenges for the adoption by lower-volume surgeons have limited the potential scope of implementation. Over the past 4 years,
Conclusions
Minimally invasive video-assisted (endoscopic) thyroidectomy as described by Miccoli and his colleagues has withstood the test of time and has been increasingly embraced by a number of surgeons around the world. To expand the application of this technique, we have described a series of modifications to help enable this procedure for the low-volume surgeon.
References (27)
- et al.
Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy
Am J Surg
(2001) Novel surgical maneuvers in modern thyroid surgery
Op Techn Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
(2009)- et al.
Minimal incision for open thyroidectomy
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
(2006) - et al.
Minimally invasive, totally gasless video-assisted thyroid lobectomy
Am J Surg
(1999) - et al.
Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: five years of experience
J Am Coll Surg
(2004) - et al.
Outpatient thyroid surgery is safe and desirable
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
(2007) - et al.
The importance of preoperative laryngoscopy in patients undergoing thyroidectomy: voice, vocal cord function, and the preoperative detection of invasive thyroid malignancy
Surgery
(2006) - et al.
Comparison between minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized study
Surgery
(2001) - et al.
Robotic thyroid surgery using a gasless, transaxillary approach and the da Vinci S system: the operative outcomes of 338 consecutive patients
Surgery
(2009) - et al.
Advanced approaches for thyroid surgery
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
(2009)
Über die Kropfexstirpation und ihre Folgen
Archiv für Klinische Chirurgie
Minimally invasive video-assisted surgery of the thyroid: a preliminary report
Langenbecks Arch Surg
Endocrine surgical technique: endoscopic thyroidectomy via the lateral approach
Surg Endosc
Cited by (12)
Substernal thyroidectomy: The transcervical approach
2018, Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology - Head and Neck SurgeryCitation Excerpt :The incision is closed with 2 or at most 3 subdermal absorbable (4-0 chromic) sutures, and then skin adhesive (Dermaflex) is applied, followed by a single horizontal ¼-inch Steri-Strip (to facilitate glue removal 2 or 3 weeks after surgery). Anesthesia is instructed to undertake deep extubation in order to minimize coughing and bucking, which may lead to spikes in pulse or systolic pressure, causing increased risk of spontaneous postoperative bleeding.6 When managing massive goiters, it is sometimes difficult to finger-dissect the mediastinal extension up into the cervical neck, owing largely to the volume of tissue.
Minimally invasive compared with conventional thyroidectomy for nodular goitre
2014, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Endocrinology and MetabolismCitation Excerpt :Key performance indicators regarding the quality of surgery for nodular goitre are clinical outcome, more specifically (i) surgical morbidity (postoperative hemorrhage requiring reoperation, transient and permanent hypoparathyroidism, recurrent and superior laryngeal nerve palsy and any other nerve injury); (ii) surgical trauma (postoperative pain and cosmetic aspects); and (iii) recurrence of goitre after less-than-total thyroidectomy – the latter outcome has not been assessed so far. Prospective randomized and recent retrospective studies [27–43,52–57,60,62–65] yielded comparable surgical morbidity for MNIT and conventional open thyroidectomy. Because none of these studies were sufficiently powered to uncover minor or moderate differences in recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy rates [69] or postoperative hypoparathyroidism, the true surgical complication rate after MNIT is awaiting clarification.
Contemporary Surgical Techniques
2014, Otolaryngologic Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :This safety profile was corroborated in a large North American study of 228 patients.22 Terris and Seybt35 described several important modifications (detailed previously) designed to aid with MIVAT procedures as well as any anterior cervical approach. An important limitation is the obligate need for 2 surgical assistants: 1 to maintain the operative field with retractors and 1 to maneuver the endoscope.
Alternative approaches to the thyroid gland
2014, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :Complications included hemorrhage in 0.9% of cases, temporary RLN weakness in 2.1% of cases, permanent RLN weakness in 0.3% of cases, temporary hypocalcemia in 2.7% of cases, permanent hypocalcemia in 0.6% of cases, and a conversion rate of 4.5%.36 This safety profile was validated in a large North American MIVAT study of 228 patients,25 and Terris and Seybt37 described several important modifications (detailed above) designed not only to aid with MIVAT procedures but also to be incorporated into any anterior cervical approach. An important potential limitation of this procedure is that 2 surgical assistants are required: one to maintain the operative field with retractors and one to maneuver the endoscope.
Endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy
2021, Robotic Surgery: Second EditionRobotic Transaxillary Thyroidectomy
2021, Innovations in Modern Endocrine Surgery
- ☆
There was no financial or material support for this research and work.
- ☆☆
Dr. Terris has directed a series of thyroid courses sponsored by Johnson and Johnson. Dr Seybt has no financial disclosures.
- ★
Presented at the Combined Triological Sections Meeting, Orlando, FL, February 4, 2010.