Current approaches to inguinal hernia repair
Section snippets
Brief historical overview
Since the mid 1800s, there have been several important milestones in the evolution of hernia surgery. In 1871, Marcy, a disciple of Joseph Lister, recognized the importance of the transversalis fascia and internal ring closure and used carbolized catgut to suture the ring with a 2-suture technique in 2 female patients [3], [4]. Bassini [5], considered today to be the “father of modern herniorrhaphy,” was the first to dissect and reconstruct the inguinal canal to preserve functional anatomy. He
Classification of inguinal hernias
Over the years, multiple classification systems have been developed, such as Halverson-McVay, Lichtenstein, Gilbert, Nyhus, Schumpelick-Arit, and Zollinger classifications, all of which evolved and sought to expand on the traditional classification of hernias as indirect, direct, or femoral [18], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30]. When approaching groin hernia repair, a classification system that is easy to use can be extremely valuable in the decision-making process about which type of repair
Most commonly used groin hernia repairs
Improved understanding of groin anatomy initially led to the tension hernia techniques, such as the Marcy, Bassini, Halstead, McVay, and Shouldice techniques. With the exception of the Shouldice repair, the other tension repairs have been plagued with higher recurrence rates and greater patient discomfort. It was estimated that primary inguinal hernia repairs had a 10% to 30% recurrence rate and that the rate was >35% for recurrent hernia repairs [32], [33]. The Shouldice repair has been the
Prolene Hernia System
In 1998, the PHS—consisting of an onlay and an underlay patch (open posterior and anterior approach)—was introduced as an option for tension-free open repair of inguinal hernias and is touted for the repair of direct, indirect, and femoral hernias. The PHS “3-in-1” repair consists of an underlay patch and an overlay patch with an intervening connector (Fig. 4). The underlay is placed either through the internal ring or through the transversalis fascia, and in theory is seated in the
Conclusion
Outcome studies after inguinal hernia repairs have demonstrated a pattern of continued improvement over the past decade. Improved understanding of groin anatomy has led to a greater appreciation for the vulnerability of the entire MPO. Innovations in technique and product design have continued to spur advances in hernia repair, and it is hoped that they will continue to improve outcomes. These improvements have occurred most notably in centers specializing in hernia surgery, with some
References (55)
Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003
Surg Clin North Am
(2003)The Marcy repair of indirect inguinal hernia
Surg Clin North Am
(1971)Inguinal hernia repaira comparison of the Shouldice and Cooper ligament repair of the posterior inguinal wall
Am J Surg
(1976)The Shouldice repair for groin hernias
Surg Clin North Am
(2003)Technique for repairing inguinal hernias with Marlex mesh
Am J Surg
(1982)- et al.
The use of Dacron in the repair of hernias of the groin
Surg Clin North Am
(1984) - et al.
The tension-free hernioplasty
Am J Surg
(1989) An anatomic and functional classification for the diagnosis and treatment of inguinal hernia
Am J Surg
(1989)- et al.
Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy
Surg Clin North Am
(1992) Herniorrhaphya personal experience with 6321 cases
Am J Surg
(1987)