Southwestern Surgical CongressImage-guided placement of long-term central venous catheters reduces complications and cost
Section snippets
Patients and Methods
Between January 2008 and August 2013, 351 patients underwent surgical placement of a long-term use CVC employing US and fluoroscopy. All procedures were performed by 2 surgeons at a single, university-based center. The majority of CVC placements were performed in an outpatient setting. The data extracted included patient demographics, procedure-related details, and outcome details, as indicated below.
The operative technique for placement of the CVC was similar between surgeons. The CVCs placed
Results
Between January 2008 and August 2013, a total of 351 patients underwent US-guided CVC placement with the IJV as the initial attempted site. Table 1 lists descriptive information of the study population. Patient demographics included a mean age of 56.3 ± 14.8 (range 19 to 94) years, body mass index 28.8 ± 7.9 (range 16 to 57), and sex was 58.4% female. The preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologist score for 55.8% of the patients was greater than or equal to 3. Monitored anesthesia care
Comments
The evidence for the routine use of the US for central vein access is overwhelming. In 2001, an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Evidence Report recommended real-time dynamic US guidance for central venous catheterization because of evidence from multiple randomized controlled trials that showed decreased number of complications with US guidance.10 In 2011, a Cochrane review of US guidance for hemodialysis catheter insertion found a significantly reduced rate of catheter placement
Conclusions
US has been confirmed to be a low cost effective measure in decreasing complication rate and increasing efficiency of CVC placement. In addition, when CVCs are placed with fluoroscopic guidance, routine postprocedure CXR can be safely eliminated at significant cost savings. The intelligent use of healthcare resources dictates combining technology resources with best practice measures to optimize patient outcomes.
References (24)
A concise history of central venous access
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol
(2011)- et al.
US-guided placement of temporary internal jugular vein catheters: immediate technical success and complications in normal and high-risk patients
Eur J Radiol
(2005) - et al.
Chest radiograph after central line placement under fluoroscopy: utility or futility?
J Pediatr Surg
(2008) - et al.
Are routine chest radiographs needed after fluoroscopically guided percutaneous insertion of central venous catheters in children?
J Pediatr Surg
(2008) - et al.
Is immediate chest radiograph necessary after central venous catheter placement in a surgical intensive care unit?
Am J Surg
(2000) - et al.
Preventing complications of central venous catheterization
N Engl J Med
(2003) - et al.
Ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in cancer patients improves the success rate of cannulation and reduces mechanical complications: a prospective observational study of 1,978 consecutive catheterizations
World J Surg Oncol
(2010) - et al.
Evaluation of an ultrasound-guided technique for central venous access via the internal jugular vein in 493 patients
Support Care Cancer
(2003) - et al.
Real-time ultrasound-guided catheterisation of the internal jugular vein: a prospective comparison with the landmark technique in critical care patients
Crit Care
(2006) - et al.
Randomized, controlled clinical trial of point-of-care limited ultrasonography assistance of central venous cannulation: the Third Sonography Outcomes Assessment Program (SOAP-3) Trial
Crit Care Med
(2005)
Real-time ultrasound guided placement of temporary internal jugular vein catheters: assessment of technical success and complication rates in nephrology practice
Nephrology
Guidance on the Use of Ultrasound Locating Devices for Placing Central Venous Catheters. Technology Appraisal Guidance No. 49
Cited by (0)
The authors report no financial conflicts of interest and no external sources of financial funding.