ReviewMeta-analysis of randomized trials comparing nonpenetrating vs mechanical mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair
Section snippets
Protocol
A protocol was built by the primary authors, which was subjected to modification after proposal and consensus of the author team. The final protocol was registered and is fully accessible from the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration no. CRD42014015374), a database built and maintained by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination of the University of York, UK.22 The protocol conformed to the Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses
Selection of studies
A total of 298 records were identified in the MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and OpenGrey databases. First-level screening excluded 260 records and 25 unique records were selected for full-text review. Nine trials fulfilled the predetermined inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis.27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 The search and selection process are outlined in Fig. 1. A list of excluded reports is available on request.
Study characteristics
No randomized trials reported on the use of self-adhering meshes or a
Comments
An increased likelihood for postoperative pain beyond 3 months after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with penetrating mesh fixation is supported by the present analysis, with similar perioperative morbidity, duration of surgery, and risk for recurrence when compared with bioglue fixation. There were only 4 available trials providing relevant data, which limits the confidence on this outcome estimate. However, consistent results with no evidence of heterogeneity were demonstrated. Available
Conclusions
In view of the results of the present analysis and the features of the included reports, the use of bioglues may be supported as an alternative approach to mechanical fixation in laparoscopic groin hernia repair without an increase in operative morbidity. Routine application cannot be supported until long-term results are available. Adequate reporting of short-term and long-term results in future research within the context of established surgical principles is essential.
References (49)
Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003
Surg Clin North Am
(2003)- et al.
Cell culture in autologous fibrin scaffolds for applications in tissue engineering
Exp Cell Res
(2014) - et al.
Tissue adhesives: cyanoacrylate glue and fibrin sealant
Gastrointest Endosc
(2013) - et al.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of haemostatic and biliostatic efficacy of fibrin sealants in elective liver surgery
J Gastrointest Surg
(2013) - et al.
Prevention of seroma formation after axillary dissection in breast cancer: a systematic review
Eur J Surg Oncol
(2011) - et al.
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration
J Clin Epidemiol
(2009) - et al.
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
Control Clin Trials
(1986) - et al.
Quantification of pain in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernioplasty identifies marked differences between prosthesis fixation systems
Surgery
(2007) - et al.
A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of lightweight mesh against heavyweight mesh in influencing the incidence of chronic groin pain following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair
Am J Surg
(2013) - et al.
The neuropathic component in persistent postsurgical pain: a systematic literature review
Pain
(2013)
Self-gripping versus sutured mesh for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature
J Surg Res
Prevalence of treated and untreated groin hernia in eastern Uganda
Br J Surg
Is surgical repair of an asymptomatic groin hernia appropriate? A review
Hernia
Operation compared with watchful waiting in elderly male inguinal hernia patients: a review and data analysis
J Am Coll Surg
Update of guidelines on laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia (International Endohernia Society)
Surg Endosc
Current treatment concepts for groin hernia
Langenbecks Arch Surg
Inguinodynia following Lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair: a review
World J Gastroenterol
Staple versus fibrin glue fixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Surg Endosc
A review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy
Clin J Pain
Low recurrence rate and low chronic pain associated with inguinal hernia repair by laparoscopic placement of Parietex ProGripTM mesh: clinical outcomes of 220 hernias with mean follow-up at 23 months
Hernia
Use of fibrin sealants in cardiovascular surgery: a systematic review
J Card Surg
Fibrin sealant (evicel® [quixil®/crossealTM]): a review of its use as supportive treatment for haemostasis in surgery
Drugs
Current state and use of biological adhesives in orthopedic surgery
Orthopedics
Wound coverage technologies in burn care: novel techniques
J Burn Care Res
Cited by (54)
Chronic postoperative inguinal pain: A narrative review
2021, Cirugia EspanolaChanging the innate consensus about mesh fixation in trans-abdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty in adults: Short and long term outcome. Randomized controlled clinical trial
2020, International Journal of SurgeryCitation Excerpt :Several techniques for mesh fixations have been used including suture, glue or self-gripping mesh for open hernia repair (OHR); metallic tack, absorbable tack, glue, suture, self-gripping mesh or even non-fixation techniques for laparoscopic hernia repair (LHR). Up to date, there have been eight systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) on OHR [4–11] (i.e., glue vs. suture (n = 5) [4,5,7,8,10] and self-gripping mesh vs. suture (n = 3) [6,9,11] and one network meta-analysis (NMA) [12] For LHR, comparisons were tack and glue (n = 6) [9,13–17]. Fixation versus no fixation (n = 3) [9,18,19].
There were no relevant financial relationships or any sources of support in the form of grants, equipment, or drugs.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.