Elsevier

Animal Behaviour

Volume 76, Issue 3, September 2008, Pages 749-760
Animal Behaviour

Ultrasonic calling during fear conditioning in the rat: no evidence for an audience effect

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.04.017Get rights and content

Rats, Rattus norvegicus, produce 22 kHz ultrasonic vocalizations in aversive situations such as during exposure to cats or fear conditioning. These calls are considered to be part of the animal's defensive repertoire and might serve as alarm signals for conspecifics. The aim of the present study was to test whether the production of 22 kHz calls is affected by the social context during fear conditioning. Animals were tested in one of three experimental conditions: either alone, with an anaesthetized conspecific, or with an active conspecific. In line with the hypothesized alarming function of 22 kHz calls, we expected the presence of a conspecific to potentiate the production of 22 kHz calls. The results, however, show that the production of 22 kHz calls during fear conditioning is clearly not potentiated by the presence of a conspecific; if at all, its presence had a mild attenuating effect on call rate. Also, call characteristics were similar in all three experimental conditions. Therefore, our findings do not support the hypothesis that the sender actively produces 22 kHz calls to warn conspecifics about danger.

Section snippets

Animals and Housing

We used 60 naïve male Wistar rats (HsdCpb:WU, Harlan-Winkelmann, Borchen, Germany), weighing 200–224 g on delivery. They were housed in groups of five in Macrolon type IV cages (380 × 200 mm and 590 mm high, plus high stainless steel covers) bedded with Tapvei peeled aspen bedding (indulab ag, Gams, Switzerland), and maintained in an animal room with a 12:12 h light:dark cycle (lights on 0700–1900 hours) at 21–25 °C (humidity: 45–70%). Lab chow (Altromin, Lage, Germany) and water (0.0004% HCl

Overt behaviour

Animals tested with an active cagemate tended to show more behavioural activity, but the statistical analysis did not yield evidence for a substantial difference, either during minutes 1–3 in the novel environment (immobility: χ22 = 2.257, P = 0.324; rearing: χ22 = 1.033, P = 0.596; grooming: χ22 = 3.386, P = 0.184; Fig. 2), or during the following minutes 4–11 (immobility: χ22 = 0.088, P = 0.957; rearing: χ22 = 4.751, P = 0.093; grooming: χ22 = 3.566, P = 0.168; Fig. 2).

Ultrasonic vocalization

Mere exposure to the novel environment did not

Discussion

The present fear-conditioning paradigm induced conditioned responses in overt behaviour and ultrasonic calling, which is in line with previous studies (Choi and Brown, 2003, Jelen et al., 2003, Wöhr et al., 2005, Borta et al., 2006, Wöhr and Schwarting, 2008). Also in accordance with previous studies, a positive correlation between immobility and 22 kHz calling was observed in experimental rats (Choi and Brown, 2003, Wöhr et al., 2005, Wöhr and Schwarting, 2008).

Acknowledgments

We thank Dorothée Domenger and Silke Eschert for their help on this project. This work was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Schw 559/8-1).

References (74)

  • O.H.P. Burman et al.

    Ultrasonic vocalizations as indicators of welfare for laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus)

    Applied Animal Behaviour Science

    (2007)
  • R.L. Commissaris et al.

    Acoustically elicited behaviours in Lister hooded and Wistar rats

    Physiology & Behavior

    (2000)
  • T. Endres et al.

    Are rats predisposed to learn 22 kHz calls as danger-predicting signals?

    Behavioural Brain Research

    (2007)
  • C.S. Evans et al.

    On the use of video images as social stimuli in birds: audience effects on alarm calling

    Animal Behaviour

    (1991)
  • C.S. Evans et al.

    Female appearance as a factor in the responsiveness of male chickens during anti-predator behaviour and courtship

    Animal Behaviour

    (1992)
  • M. Gyger et al.

    Avian alarm calling: is there an audience effect?

    Animal Behaviour

    (1986)
  • J.L. Hoogland

    Nepotism and alarm calling in the black-tailed prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus)

    Animal Behaviour

    (1983)
  • J.L. Hoogland

    Why do Gunnison's prairie dogs give anti-predator calls?

    Animal Behaviour

    (1996)
  • P. Jelen et al.

    22 kHz ultrasonic vocalization in rats as an index of anxiety but not fear: behavioral and pharmacological modulation of affective state

    Behavioural Brain Research

    (2003)
  • M.T. Kaltwasser

    Startle-inducing acoustic stimuli evoke ultrasonic vocalization in the rat

    Physiology & Behavior

    (1990)
  • Y. Kiyokawa et al.

    Alarm pheromone increases defensive and risk assessment behaviors in male rats

    Physiology & Behavior

    (2006)
  • R.A. Kroes et al.

    Social defeat, a paradigm of depression in rats that elicits 22 kHz vocalizations, preferentially activates the cholinergic signaling pathway in the periaqueductal gray

    Behavioural Brain Research

    (2007)
  • Y. Litvin et al.

    Rat 22 kHz ultrasonic vocalizations as alarm cries

    Behavioural Brain Research

    (2007)
  • S.I. Neophytou et al.

    Strain differences to the effects of aversive frequency ultrasound on behaviour and brain topography of c-fos expression in the rat

    Brain Research

    (2000)
  • J. Panksepp et al.

    50-kHz chirping (laughter?) in response to conditioned and unconditioned tickle-induced reward in rats: effects of social housing and genetic variables

    Behavioural Brain Research

    (2000)
  • M. Sadananda et al.

    Playback of 22 kHz and 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations induces differential c-fos expression in rat brain

    Neuroscience Letters

    (2008)
  • G.D. Sales

    Ultrasound and aggressive behaviour in rats and other small mammals

    Animal Behaviour

    (1972)
  • G.D. Sales

    The effect of 22 kHz calls and artificial 38 kHz signals on activity in rats

    Behavioural Processes

    (1991)
  • C. Sanchez

    Stress-induced vocalisation in adult animals. A valid model of anxiety?

    European Journal of Pharmacology

    (2003)
  • R.K.W. Schwarting et al.

    Situational factors, conditions and individual variables which can determine ultrasonic vocalizations in male adult Wistar rats

    Behavioural Brain Research

    (2007)
  • J.K. Shepherd et al.

    Morphine attenuates antipredator ultrasonic vocalizations in mixed-sex rat colonies

    Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior

    (1992)
  • F.M. Tomazini et al.

    Opposite effects of short- and long-duration isolation on ultrasonic vocalization, startle and prepulse inhibition in rats

    Journal of Neuroscience Methods

    (2006)
  • M. Voits et al.

    Role of cholecystokinin type B receptors in ultrasound induced behavior in rats

    Peptides

    (1999)
  • M. Wöhr et al.

    Overt behavior and ultrasonic vocalization in a fear conditioning paradigm: a dose-response study in the rat

    Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

    (2005)
  • N. Adler et al.

    The behavior of communicating: an analysis of the 22 kHz call of rats (Rattus norvegicus)

    American Zoology

    (1979)
  • Bang, S. J., Allen, T. A., Jones, L. K., Boguszewski, P. & Brown, T. H. In press. Asymmetrical stimulus generalization...
  • R.J. Barfield et al.

    Sexual behavior: ultrasonic postejaculatory song of the male rat

    Science

    (1972)
  • Cited by (49)

    • Measuring social communication in rodent models of neurodevelopmental disorders

      2021, Encyclopedia of Behavioral Neuroscience: Second Edition
    • Reduced emission of alarm 22-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations during fear conditioning in rats lacking the serotonin transporter

      2021, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Importantly, 22-kHz USV emission was reported to be potentiated by the presence of conspecifics and to evoke a fear response in receiver rats. The latter was also observed during social fear conditioning (Kim et al., 2010; Wöhr and Schwarting, 2008b) and confirmed in playback studies, where 22-kHz USV induced behavioral inhibition in receiver rats (Brudzynski and Chiu, 1995; Fendt et al., 2018). In preclinical research, alarm 22-kHz USV emission was repeatedly used for testing the efficacy of novel potential anxiolytic compounds and antidepressant drugs, primarily targeting serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT; Sánchez, 2003; Wöhr and van Gaalen, 2018).

    • The effect of acupuncture stimulation on alleviating emotional changes due to acute alcohol administration and the possibility of sigma<inf>1</inf> receptor involvement

      2021, Integrative Medicine Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Rodents emit USVs in the 50–55 kHz and 22–28 kHz ranges, which are reliably associated with positive and negative emotional states, respectively.16–18 According to recent ethanol addiction research, escalated levels of ETOH consumed by ETOH-dependent rats are significantly correlated with ETOH anticipatory 50–55 kHz FM USVs, and ETOH-dependent rats in a state of withdrawal are more easily provoked to emit negative affect-associated 22–28-kHz USVs in response to mildly aversive stimuli.17–19 In the acute ETOH model, studies have focused on behavioral changes such as locomotor activity and FST, but few studies have evaluated the changes in real-time emotional state through USV analysis.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text