Original article
Sensory Retraining of the Lower Limb After Acute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.010Get rights and content

Abstract

Lynch EA, Hillier SL, Stiller K, Campanella RR, Fisher PH. Sensory retraining of the lower limb after acute stroke: a randomized controlled pilot trial.

Objective

To determine the effects of a sensory retraining protocol on sensation, postural control, and gait in acute stroke subjects.

Design

Randomized controlled pilot trial.

Setting

Inpatient rehabilitation hospital.

Participants

Twenty-one subjects with sensory deficits in the feet, undergoing rehabilitation for stroke.

Intervention

Sensory retraining of the more affected lower limb versus relaxation (sham intervention).

Main Outcome Measures

Light touch at the sole of the foot (Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments), proprioception (Distal Proprioception Test), postural control (Berg Balance Scale), and gait (timed, Iowa Level of Assistance Scale).

Results

Significant improvements (P<.05) over time were found in light touch at 3 points of the feet and in postural control, timed gait, and walking aid. No significant time effects were observed in proprioception or amount of assistance required to walk. No significant differences were detected between groups in any of the outcome variables, apart from light touch at the first metatarsal. The study had poor power (13%) to detect group effects due to the small sample size.

Conclusions

Results of this pilot study are unable to support or refute the routine use of sensory retraining of the lower limb for people during inpatient rehabilitation after stroke. Further research with a larger sample size is required.

Section snippets

Methods

Ethics approval was obtained from the Royal Adelaide Hospital and the University of South Australia.

Results

Twenty-one subjects were recruited over a 9-month period, with 10 in the sensory retraining group, and 11 in the control treatment group (fig 1). One subject in the sensory retraining group was withdrawn because he developed an acute illness requiring readmission to the acute hospital. His data were collected at follow-up and included in the analysis following the ITT principle.

Results from a retrospective power calculation showed that the current study was strongly (99.7%) powered to detect

Discussion

This pilot study found that a standardized protocol of sensory retraining of the feet was not significantly more effective than relaxation in improving sensation, balance, or walking ability in a sample of acute stroke subjects.

In previous studies investigating the effectiveness of sensory retraining, repeated-measure (single-case study) designs have been used more often than experimental designs with control groups, because stroke subjects are a highly heterogeneous subject group and therefore

Conclusions

The protocol used in the current pilot study to retrain sensation in the feet of people with stroke undergoing inpatient rehabilitation was not found to be more effective than a control group receiving relaxation in improving sensation, balance, or walking ability. No firm recommendations regarding sensory retraining of the feet for stroke subjects undergoing rehabilitation can be made at this point due to the methodologic limitations of the current study and further research is warranted,

Acknowledgment

We thank the Physiotherapy Department, Hampstead Rehabilitation Centre, Royal Adelaide Hospital, and John Petkov, MSc.

References (39)

  • C. Richards et al.

    Task-specific therapy for optimization of gait recovery in acute stroke patients

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (1993)
  • L.M. Carey

    Somatosensory loss after stroke

    Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med

    (1995)
  • S. Nadeau et al.

    Analysis of the clinical factors determining natural and maximal gait speeds in adults with a stroke

    Am J Phys Med Rehabil

    (1999)
  • L. Julkunen et al.

    Recovery of somatosensory deficits in acute stroke

    Acta Neurol Scand

    (2005)
  • N. Byl et al.

    Effectiveness of sensory and motor rehabilitation of the upper limb following principles of neuroplasticity: patients stable poststroke

    Neurorehabil Neural Repair

    (2003)
  • M. Yekutiel et al.

    A controlled trial of the retraining of the sensory function of the hand in stroke patients

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (1993)
  • S. Morioka et al.

    Effects of perceptual learning exercises on standing balance using a hardness discrimination task in hemiplegic patients following stroke: a randomized controlled pilot trial

    Clin Rehabil

    (2003)
  • R.P. Van Peppen et al.

    The impact of physiotherapy on functional outcomes after strokeWhat’s the evidence?

    Clin Rehabil

    (2004)
  • S. Hillier et al.

    A pilot study of sensory retraining for the hemiparetic foot post stroke

    Int J Rehabil Res

    (2006)
  • Cited by (58)

    • Recovery of walking ability in stroke patients through postacute care rehabilitation

      2023, Biomedical Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      For instance, Kim et al. investigated the influence of ataxia on walking ability after stroke, and all the recruited patients with ataxia had limb muscle strength ≥4 on the Medical Resource Council Scale and NIHSS ≤5 [26]. Lynch et al. investigated the effect of sensory retraining on gait speed, and all the recruited patients had significant sensory impairment and were already able to walk 10 m at baseline [27]. Gait speed is a key indicator of general gait performance and can be used to discriminate among levels of walking disability.

    • Functions necessary for gait independence in patients with stroke: A study using decision tree

      2020, Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
      Citation Excerpt :

      On the other hand, the effects of approaches aiming to improve proprioception in stroke patients, especially lower limb proprioception, remain unknown at present. For example, Lynch et al.27 reported that the sensory training of lower limb in acute stroke patients for 2 weeks resulted in significantly improved tactile but not proprioception. In addition, Hiller et al.28 also reported that the sensory training of lower limb in three chronic stroke patients for 2 weeks resulted in significantly changed in light touch appreciation for two subjects but not proprioception.

    • Somatosensory deficits

      2018, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
      Citation Excerpt :

      We describe these studies in a separate section because, in most of these studies, motor function improvement, and not somatosensory function, was the primary outcome parameter. The available studies used active movement or balance training (Wong et al., 2012), passive movement training (Beets et al., 2012), somatosensory stimulation training (mostly vibration training, targeting patients with Parkinson disease (Chouza et al., 2011), somatosensory discrimination training (Lynch et al., 2007), or a combination of these (McKenzie et al., 2009)). Although interventions and outcome measures vary greatly, there is converging evidence that proprioceptive training improves somatosensory and sensorimotor function (Aman et al., 2014).

    • The effects of plantar perception training on balance and falls efficacy of the elderly with a history of falls: A single-blind, randomized controlled trial

      2018, Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Dynamic balance as well as static balance is important for the prevention of falls in the elderly (Daneshjoo, Mokhtar, Rahnama, & Yusof, 2012). In previous studies, standing on rubber mats or sponge mats was used to perform plantar perception training (Lynch, Hillier, Stiller, Campanella, & Fisher, 2007; Gandolfi et al., 2015). However, since balance can be improved even while just standing on them, there was a limitation in confirming whether plantar perception training is effective in improving balance by only the results of these studies.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

    Reprints are not available from the author.

    View full text