Special communicationLooking Upstream: Factors Shaping the Demand for Postacute Joint Replacement Rehabilitation
Section snippets
Rapid Increase in Joint Replacements
Using HCUPnet,1 an online data tool, we reviewed 13 years of data (1993–2005) furnished by the AHRQ to evaluate major trends in the numbers of joint replacements performed in the United States. The AHRQ database, known as NIS, is based on a 20% sample of all hospital discharges in the nation. From 1993 to 2005, there has been nearly a 2.5-fold increase in the number of total knee replacements (identified as ICD-9-CM procedure code 81.54)—from 200,216 to 497,419—and a 1.75-fold increase in the
Variation in Use of Joint Replacement
To focus only on the rapid growth of arthroplastic surgeries overlooks important differences across populations and geographic areas. There remain significant differences in sex, race, and geographic location. Some of these disparities, especially those that relate to race and geography, suggest there may be additional increases in demand should these disparities diminish in the future.
Projections of Future Use
Although the procedure has become increasingly prevalent in the last few decades, researchers expect the trend to continue well into the future. Several studies have been conducted to project the number of primary hip and knee replacements as well as revisions. Based on a 2002 AAOS analysis, Frankowski and Watkins-Castillo21 projected that there will be over 274,000 total hip replacements and 474,000 total knee replacements in 2030. Apparently, this projection greatly underestimated the volume
Dynamics Behind Actual and Projected Growth Rates
Rapid growth in the actual and projected number of joint replacements poses important questions: what is fueling the growth? What are the implications of this growth for payers (eg, Medicare), downstream PAC providers, and health policy makers? To answer these questions, we use a market approach that examines (1) the demand side, (2) the supply side, and (3) the role of financial intermediaries whose policies modulate the interaction between demand and supply sides of the market.
Demand Side
Increasing demand for joint replacements from patients is the major engine driving the growth of joint replacements. Growing numbers of candidates for the procedure and the procedure's presumed underuse among selected groups will continue to contribute to increasing demand.
Aging remains the strongest risk factor associated with development of osteoarthritis, the most common condition leading an individual to seek a joint replacement.23, 24, 25 In 1999, about 12% of all American adults over 65
Supply Side
As demand for total joint replacements increases, changes in supply also are taking place. These changes include increases in the supply of practitioners, advances in surgical technology of joint replacement, and indications for joint replacement. Over the past few decades, these changes have strengthened the provider's capacity to offer more procedures, improved the surgical safety and efficacy, and expanded the target population that could benefit from the procedure.
Changing Payer Mix
Financial intermediaries have played an important and, perhaps, an inadvertent role in the growth of total joint replacement. Because of the age distribution of patients obtaining a joint replacement, Medicare remains the single most important payer and accounted for about 57% of all payment for total joint replacements in 2005. The payer mix for the procedure, however, has changed significantly over the last decade. Medicare's proportion of all charges continues to decline as younger
Implications for Postacute Rehabilitation Care
Upstream trends in society at large and acute care in particular have material downstream effects on demand for, and supply of, postacute rehabilitation services for individuals who acquire a joint replacement.
Oversimplified, increasing numbers of patients with joint replacement who participate in a postacute bed service rehabilitation program—that is, in SNFs or IRFs—are a function of 2 main variables: (1) volume of joint replacement patients and (2) rates at which they are discharged to a
Conclusions
Total joint replacement provides material benefits for patients who seek substantial pain relief, improved function, and quality of life.68 This article reviews the use of total joint replacement in the United States. The number of joint replacements performed has increased rapidly in the last decade, and the trend is predicted to continue in the future. Three groups of factors—increasing demand, increasing supply, and financial incentives—are associated with the use of the procedure. Despite
References (68)
- et al.
Self-assessed global quality of life: a comparison between African-American and white older patients with arthritis
J Clin Epidemiol
(2002) - et al.
Decreasing length of stay after total joint arthroplasty: effect on referrals to rehabilitation units
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(1999) - et al.
Impact of declining reimbursement and rising hospital costs on the feasibility of total hip arthroplasty
J Arthroplasty
(1997) - et al.
Use of rehabilitation and other health care services by patients with joint replacement after discharge from skilled nursing and inpatient rehabilitation facilities
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2009) - et al.
Does shortened length of hospital stay affect total knee arthroplasty rehabilitation outcomes?
J Arthroplasty
(2005) HCUPnet, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project
- et al.
Variations in the use of medical and surgical services by the Medicare population
N Engl J Med
(1986) - et al.
Geographic variations in the rates of elective total hip and knee arthroplasties among Medicare beneficiaries in the United States
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(1992) - et al.
Demographic variation in the rate of knee replacement: a multi-year analysis
Health Serv Res
(1996) - et al.
Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(2005)
Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States Medicare population
J Bone Joint Surg Am
Epidemiology of total knee replacement in the United States Medicare population
J Bone Joint Surg Am
Differences between men and women in the rate of use of hip and knee arthroplasty
N Engl J Med
Gender differences in patient preferences may underlie differential utilization of elective surgery
Am J Med
Income, race, and surgery in Maryland
Am J Public Health
Trends in epidemiology of knee arthroplasty in the United States, 1990-2000
Arthritis Rheum
Racial differences in the use of total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis among older Americans
Ethn Dis
Impact of race on cardiac care and outcomes in veterans with acute myocardial infarction
Med Care
Racial, ethnic, and geographic disparities in rates of knee arthroplasty among Medicare patients
N Engl J Med
Total hip arthroplasty: use and select complications in the US Medicare population
Am J Public Health
Total hip replacement rates are higher among Caucasians than Asians in Hawaii
Clin Orthop Relat Res
Disparity in total hip replacement affecting Hispanic Medicare beneficiaries
Med Care
The influence of income and race on total knee arthroplasty in the United States
J Bone Joint Surg Am
Effect of provider volume on resource utilization for surgical procedures of the knee
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
Primary total knee and hip arthroplasty projections for the U.S. population to the year 2030
Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030
J Bone Joint Surg Am
Incidence and risk factors for radiographic knee osteoarthritis in middle-aged women: the Chingford Study
Arthritis Rheum
Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: an update
Curr Opin Rheumatol
Changing demographics of patients with total joint replacement
Clin Orthop Relat Res
The impact of arthritis in rural populations
Arthritis Care Res
Osteoarthritis pain and its treatment
Curr Opin Rheumatol
Dramatic changes in U.S. aging highlighted in new census, NIH report: impact of baby boomers anticipated
65+ in the United States, 2005U.S. Census Bureau
Cited by (51)
The role of pain and walking difficulties in shaping willingness to undergo joint surgery for osteoarthritis: Data from the Swedish BOA register
2021, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage OpenDevelopment of quality indicators for hip and knee arthroplasty rehabilitation
2018, Osteoarthritis and CartilageCitation Excerpt :There is a growing body of evidence to suggest that implementing and measuring QIs result in improvements in processes of cares and patient-relevant outcomes1,2,6,10. Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) for advanced hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a high priority, high demand elective surgical procedure in Canada and other countries11–13. QIs have been developed and implemented for OA14, and indicators and performance benchmarks have been established for medical and surgical TJA peri-operative care processes5, outcomes15, and TJA wait times16 in some countries.
Length of Stay in Skilled Nursing Facilities Following Total Joint Arthroplasty
2017, Journal of ArthroplastyPrevalence and Costs of Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy After Primary TJA
2015, Journal of ArthroplastyPostacute care
2014, Medicina ClinicaIn-home telerehabilitation compared with faceto-face rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: A noninferiority randomized controlled trial
2015, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume
Supported by the HealthSouth Corp, ARA Research Institute of the American Rehabilitation Providers Association, Brooks Health, National Rehabilitation Hospital, American Hospital Association, the Federation of American Hospitals, and others.
A commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has conferred or will confer a financial benefit on one or more of the authors.