Original ArticleInfluence of Polyethylene Constraint on Tibial Component Fixation in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Follow-Up Report After 5 Years
Section snippets
Patients and Methods
Eighty-three patients (87 knees) with noninflammatory gonarthrosis were operated with the AMK (DePuy, Johnson & Johnson) total knee replacement. Patients with a 5° or less varus-valgus alignment were randomly selected to receive either a relatively flat or a concave tibial plateau. The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) was retained. Patients who had more than 5° varus-valgus alignment and /or extension defect of 10° or more were randomly selected to receive either a concave or a
Lost to Follow-Up and Revisions
Fifteen patients were lost to the 5-year follow-up. Two patients were revised before the 1-year follow-up [4]. After 2-year follow-up, one patient with a flat insert was operated with intramedullary nail because of supracondylar femoral fracture and had 25° of valgus alignment after nailing. Seven patients had died because of reasons unrelated to the TKA, one had dementia, three patients refused follow-up because of other disabilities, and one had moved abroad.
Radiostereometry
Eight to 9 spherical tantalum markers (size 0.8 mm) were inserted into the proximal tibia after preparation of the bone and before cementing of the components. Three 0.5-mm and three 0.8-mm tantalum markers were inserted in the polyethylene component. The biplanar radiostereometric technique and the UmRSA 3.2 software (RSA Biomedical Innovations, Umeå, Sweden) were used. Fictive points were used to measure translations [8]. Rotation around the transverse, longitudinal and sagittal axes, maximum
Radiographic Evaluation
Radiolucent lines around the tibial and femoral components were evaluated according to the Knee Society scoring postoperatively and after 2 and 5 years [12]. An orthopedic surgeon, who had not operated on any of the patients, evaluated the radiographs. The width of all zones around the tibial and femoral components is summarized resulting in a total score for each component. Radiolucent with a total score of 5 to 9 should be followed for progression and 10 or more signifies possible or
Clinical Evaluation
The Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Scores (HSS) [13] was used at the clinical evaluation.
Statistics
Mann-Whitney U test was used to evaluate the results at 5 years. P values less than .05 were regarded to represent statistically significant differences. Based on the number of knees available at 5 years, we could detect differences of rotation between 0.2° and 0.4° with at least 80% probability depending on the direction of the rotation and subgroup analyzed. With the same power, differences of 0.3 mm in lift-off and maximum subsidence could be detected. Correspondingly, differences of 0.6 mm
Small Deformity—Retained PCL
From 2 to 5 years, the absolute rotation about the longitudinal (internal/external rotation) and transverse (anterior/posterior tilting) axes tended to increase in the group with flat inserts, whereas minimum changes were seen in the concave group. There was also a tendency to increased rotation around sagittal axis (varus-valgus tilting) after 2 years in the group with concave inserts, but none of these tendencies resulted in any significant differences at 5 years. Neither did the translation
Discussion
In the 5-year follow-up, we found no definite influence of tibial implant design on clinical performance, regardless of the degree of preoperative deformity. The fixation of the tibial component was not influenced by choice of insert design in cases with minor deformity. In the group with more pronounced deformity, PS inserts displayed increased rotation about the sagittal axis. Most of the migration parameters studied showed a similar pattern suggesting that the joint area design had a very
Acknowledgment
This project was financially sponsored by the Swedish Medical Research Council (MRF K97-17X-07941-11B9), the Ingabritt and Arne Lundbergs Research Foundation, the Félix Neubergh Research Foundation, the Göteborg Medical Society, and DePuy, Johnson & Johns on.
References (21)
- et al.
Average and peak contact stress distribution evaluation of total knee arthroplasties
J Arthroplasty
(1996) - et al.
Concave versus posterior-stabilized tibial joint surface in total knee arthroplasty. Randomized evaluation of 47 knees
J Arthroplasty
(2001) - et al.
Increased varus-valgus tilting of screw-fixated knee prostheses. Stereoradiographic study of uncemented versus cemented tibial components
J Arthroplasty
(1993) - et al.
Hydroxyapatite coating versus cemented fixation of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. Prospective randomised comparison of hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components with 5-year follow-up using radiostereometry
J Arthroplasty
(1999) - et al.
The precision of radiostereometric measurements. Manual vs. digital measurements
J Biomech
(2002) - et al.
Tibial component fixation in porous- and hydroxyapatite-coated total knee arthroplasty. A radiostereometric evaluation of migration and inducible displacement after 5 years
J Arthroplasty
(2000) - et al.
In vivo determination of condylar lift-off and screw-home in a mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty
J Arhtroplasty
(1999) - et al.
Inducible displacements of cemented tibial components during weight-bearing and knee extension. Observations during dynamic radiostereometry related to joint positions and 2 years history of migration in 16 TKR
J Orthop Res
(2001) - et al.
Detrimental kinematics of a flat on flat total condylar knee arthroplasty
Clin Orthop
(1999) - et al.
Polyethylene wear of metal-backed tibial components in total and unicompartmental knee prostheses
J Bone Joint Surg Br
(1992)
Cited by (0)
Benefits or funds were received in partial or total support of the research material described in this article from the Swedish Medical Research Council (MRF K97-17X-07941-11B9), the Ingabritt and Arne Lundbergs Research Foundation, the Félix Neubergh Research Foundation, the Göteborg Medical Society and DePuy, Johnson & Johnson.