Does intra-individual change predict offender recidivism? Searching for the Holy Grail in assessing offender change
Highlights
► We review measures used to assess intra-individual change among offenders. ► We examined constructs in the cognitive, violence, and substance use domains. ► Few direct tests of change predicting criminal recidivism were available. ► Known dynamic risk factors were the best predictors in all domains examined. ► Research could advance through refined measurement strategies and constructs.
Introduction
There is consistent and conclusive evidence that groups of offenders exposed to appropriate treatment recidivate at lower rates, on average, compared to groups of offenders excluded from treatment (for meta-analytic reviews, see Andrews and Bonta, 2010, Andrews et al., 1990). Minimally, appropriate and effective correctional treatment applies three empirically supported principles. In brief, the greatest potential for change occurs when programs employ cognitive–behavioral techniques (the responsivity principle) to target individual-level variables empirically associated with reoffending (the need principle) among offenders most likely to commit further crime (the risk principle; Andrews & Bonta, 2010). Programs that employ these principles show the greatest treatment effects (Gendreau et al., 2006, Smith et al., 2009) and result in a greater cost–benefit ratio (Aos, Miller, & Drake, 2006) compared to programs that do not adhere to these principles.
However, considerations beyond these three core principles are also empirically and theoretically important, including program quality (Lowenkamp, Latessa, & Smith, 2006), program staff and their ability to build strong interpersonal alliances with offender clients (Ross et al., 2008, Serin and Shturman, 2007), offenders' ability and opportunity to engage in treatment (Ward, Day, Howells, & Birgden, 2004), and methods for enhancing offenders' motivation for change (McMurran, 2009). Recently developed theoretical models of treatment readiness and offender motivation (e.g., Ward et al., 2004) have set forward a framework for systematically examining individual offenders' experience of the therapeutic process.
These considerations demonstrate the research community's increasing interest in enhancing understanding of the specific mechanisms (i.e., program elements, individual characteristics, therapeutic gains) that reduce an individual offender's propensity to recommit crime. The current state of knowledge addresses group-level (or program-level) considerations but fails to address the variables that explain which offenders benefit from treatment, how these offenders assimilate program content into palpable gains, when criminogenic needs have declined enough to justify a lower risk classification, and what relative influence treatment has in the broader array of factors that initiate, motivate, and maintain offender change.
In particular, it remains relatively unexplored whether individual-level changes are reliably associated with reduced risk for recidivism. Although the body of offender treatment research strongly suggests individuals are making detectable gains within correctional treatment, the individual-level gains responsible for the change process have not been identified or integrated into the theory and practice of offender treatment. Identifying the intra-individual factors responsible for driving offender change is of great practical importance for evaluating and further enhancing rehabilitation efforts.
The purpose of this paper is to review and critique the relevant corrections-based literature linking intra-individual change to criminal behavior outcomes. Our review focuses on identifying which individual-level variables show reliable change associated with recidivism. As a result, we only make brief mention of variables that characterize treatment groups, such as type of treatment provided, adherence to risk, need, and responsivity principles, research design, etc. We expect that the relationship between change and recidivism would be impacted by treatment content and quality, but given the scarcity of research on intra-individual change, our main purpose is to highlight which assessment strategies best delineate offender change, regardless of the type of treatment delivered. As the knowledge base on intra-individual change increases, examinations of the interaction between treatment features, individual change, and recidivism will be more feasible. Currently, we refer readers to available discussions of the evidence for the relative effects (Smith et al., 2009) and cumulative effects (Andrews & Bonta, 2010) of risk, need, and responsivity factors on program effectiveness.
Although we examined all studies measuring change within offenders, we focus here on measures of change that have been empirically tested for association with future offending to critically examine whether change scores are inversely related to recidivism.2 In addition, we narrowed the scope of our review to explore three domains most often targeted in offender treatment: (a) cognition, (b) violence, and (c) substance misuse. Within the literature on violent offenders, we excluded research examining sex offenders and domestic violence offenders due to these offenders' unique and specialized treatment needs (Serin & Preston, 2001; for a review of intra-individual change within sex offenders, see Beggs, 2010, and for a discussion of treatment change among domestic violence offenders, see Scott, 2004). With an aim to limit the scope of this paper, our review further excluded studies of change in psychopathology (symptoms of mental illness) or educational achievement (reading or math skills).
Section snippets
Study selection
Studies were evaluated if they met the following two criteria: the researchers (a) sampled offenders identified by one of the specified domains, and (b) assessed variable(s) at a minimum of two time periods, statistically analyzing change over time. We did not require that studies include an intervention between measurement periods, but most studies were pre–post treatment designs. These criteria exclude studies that employ treatment providers' single-time ratings of treatment gain as a measure
Cognition
We identified a varied set of cognitive measures and measurement techniques assessing attitudes toward offending, problem solving, values, moral reasoning, self-control, self-esteem, attitudes toward family functioning, and more. Of the 222 studies that met the inclusion criteria, 161 exclusively examined change. Of the remaining 61 studies that additionally reported participant outcome data, 12 studies explicitly linked intra-individual change with offending outcome, and 18 studies employed a
Discussion
High-quality studies linking intra-individual change to recidivism are sparse within the research literature. It is a clear limitation that conclusions from this review are based only on available information, with many potential effect sizes unreported by study authors.7
Acknowledgment
This research was supported by an award from the National Institute of Corrections 08PEI22GJX3.
References (118)
Within-treatment outcome among sexual offenders: A review
Aggression and Violent Behavior
(2010)- et al.
Promoting forgiveness in violent offenders: A more positive approach to offender rehabilitation?
Aggression and Violent Behavior
(2008) - et al.
A randomized experimental study of gender-responsive substance abuse treatment for women in prison
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
(2010) - et al.
A cognitive therapy treatment program for repeat DUI offenders
Journal of Criminal Justice
(2008) Many sizes fit all: A preliminary framework for conceptualizing the development and provision of cognitive–behavioral rehabilitation programs for offenders
Aggression and Violent Behavior
(2011)- et al.
The therapeutic alliance: A theoretical revision for offender rehabilitation
Aggression and Violent Behavior
(2008) - et al.
Social skills training with adolescent male offenders—II. Short-Term, long-term and generalized effects
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(1981) - et al.
The Level of Service Inventory — Revised (LSI-R)
(1995) - et al.
The psychology of criminal conduct
(2010) - et al.
Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta- analysis
Criminology
(1990)
Evidence-based public policy options to reduce future prison construction, criminal justice costs and crime rates (Document ID 06-10-1201)
Generic correctional programming for mentally ill offenders: A pilot study
Criminal Justice and Behavior
Differential treatment of juveniles on probation: An evaluative study
Canadian Journal of Criminology and Corrections
The Reasoning and Rehabilitation program: Assessing short- and long-term outcomes among male Swedish prisoners
Journal of Offender Rehabilitation
The dynamic prediction of criminal recidivism: A three-wave prospective study
Law and Human Behavior
A longitudinal test of the effects of parenting and the stability of self-control: Negative evidence for the general theory of crime
Criminology
Crime control strategies and community change: Reframing the surveillance vs. treatment debate
Federal Probation
The process of change in offender rehabilitation programmes
Psychology, Crime & Law
Cocaine use and delinquent behavior among high-risk youths: A growth model of parallel processes
Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse
Marijuana use among juvenile arrestees: A two-part growth model analysis
Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse
Drug use and delinquent behavior: A growth model of parallel processes among high-risk youths
Criminal Justice and Behavior
The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI)®: Administration, scoring and procedures manual
Alternative placements for juvenile offenders: Results from the evaluation of the Nokomis Challenge program
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
Anger management programming for federal male inmate: An effective intervention (Research Report No. 82)
Readiness to change as a predictor of drug-related behaviors in a sample of rural felony probationers
The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse
Practice-based outcomes of dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) targeting anger and violence, with male forensic patients: A pragmatic and non-contemporaneous comparison
Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health
Evaluation of two intensive regimes for young offenders (Research Study No. 239)
Evaluation of the drug and alcohol addiction and relapse prevention programs in community offender services: One year out (Research Bulletin No. 24)
Practicing psychology in correctional settings: “What works” in reducing criminal behavior
The forgotten issue in effective correctional treatment: Program implementation
International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!
Criminology
Emotions and crime over the life course: A neo-meadian perspective on criminal continuity and change
The American Journal of Sociology
Evaluating the effectiveness of the National Institute of Corrections' “Thinking for a Change” program among probationers
Journal of Offender Rehabilitation
The High Intensity Substance Abuse Program (HISAP): Results from the pilot programs (Research Report No. 140)
The effect of local life circumstances on female probationers' offending
Justice Quarterly
Cognitive mediators of aggression in adolescent offenders: II
Intervention. Developmental Psychology
Multisystemic therapy with violent and chronic juvenile offenders and their families: The role of treatment fidelity in successful dissemination
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Social skills training with young offenders in a borstal: An evaluative study
Journal of Community Psychology
Criminal careers in the short-term: Intra-individual variability in crime and its relation to local life circumstances
American Sociological Review
Anger management program outcomes
Forum on Corrections Research
Anger management in the prison: An evaluation
Forum on Corrections Research
Drug treatment as a crime fighting tool
The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics
Can we make accurate long-term predictions about patterns of de-escalation in offending behavior?
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Late adolescence deceleration of criminal activity and development of self- and social control
Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention
Cited by (82)
Rehabilitative progress in prison: Some challenges and possibilities
2022, Aggression and Violent BehaviorWhy we cannot explain cross-cultural differences in risk assessment
2020, Aggression and Violent BehaviorCitation Excerpt :However, in order to be dynamic, a risk factor must not just increase the propensity for violence, but it also must be able to change, and these changes must predict changes in recidivism, perhaps as a result of intervention targeting these particular factors (Douglas & Skeem, 2005). Little research has examined the link between intra-individual change and recidivism (Helmus, 2018; Serin, Lloyd, Helmus, Derkzen, & Luong, 2013) and evidence regarding the relationship between changes in DRF and rates of recidivism is not as consistent as is commonly presumed. There are numerous methodological limitations and small effect sizes, and evidence that treatment is responsible for producing changes in DRF scores is inconclusive due to measurement inconsistencies and vague definitions of treatment (Heffernan, Wegerhoff, & Ward, 2019).
Dynamic risk factors: Conceptualization, measurement, and evidence
2019, Aggression and Violent BehaviorCitation Excerpt :However, there was variation and the studies surveyed had their limitations; these authors suggest that “while offenders may make some important in-treatment psychological changes, these changes may or may not necessarily be risk related” (Olver & Wong, 2013, p. 588). As mentioned in the previous section, Serin et al. (2013) conducted a review investigating the link between intra-individual DRF change and recidivism. When considering the role of treatment in the studies they reviewed, the authors concluded:
Parole Decision-Making and Empirical Practice: A Survey of Paroling Authorities
2024, Prison JournalThe Psychology of Criminal Conduct: Seventh Edition
2023, The Psychology of Criminal Conduct: Seventh EditionDo Some Dynamic Risk Factors Signal Imminent Recidivism? Testing the Conceptual Distinction Between Stable and Acute Dynamic Risk Factors
2023, Criminal Justice and Behavior
- 1
Now at: Correctional Service of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.